It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Kepler B22 is about 600 light years..
b) I doubt we have the technology to scan
or even decrypt the signals, IF there were
any, from an ADVANCED race that had the
technology for interstellar comunication.
everal criteria were used to select the planet candidates that SETI wanted to target. Many of the candidates were selected due to their position in the "Habitable Zone," or the region around a star where liquid water could be maintained on the surface of an orbiting planet.
Of the 86 total SETI candidates, 71 have a calculated surface temperature between about -50 C and 100 C, placing them in this zone. All stars with over four Kepler candidates in orbit were included, along with any candidate with an orbital period greater than 50 days and a radius less than three times that of Earth. We also included the star hosting the first confirmed rocky planet outside our solar system, Kepler 10b.
Originally posted by Wirral Bagpuss
Embarrsingly for Planet Earth one of the first broadcasts that will reach our cosmic neighbours will be the Nazi Olympics games and Hitler saluting. Not a very ideal First Contact message I dont think! Perhaps this is why they have not said hello to us or landed on the perverbial White House Lawn. They dont want to get involved in a race that commits genoicide against itself! I dont blame them.
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
reply to post by Miccey
b) I doubt we have the technology to scan
or even decrypt the signals, IF there were
any, from an ADVANCED race that had the
technology for interstellar comunication.
maybe they'd be smart enough to dumb it down for us
:-)
Originally posted by Miccey
How would they know they NEED to?
If we were to SEND a signal to lets say the
planets discoverd by Kepler, would we use
simple radiosignals. Dont think so. 20ly,
radiosignal.. We would probobly try to
think of some FASTER way. .
How would they know they NEED to?
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Think of a faster way we are using the speed of light so what have you got.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by Miccey
How would they know they NEED to?
If we were to SEND a signal to lets say the
planets discoverd by Kepler, would we use
simple radiosignals. Dont think so. 20ly,
radiosignal.. We would probobly try to
think of some FASTER way. .
Think of a faster way we are using the speed of light so what have you got.
Originally posted by Miccey
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by Miccey
How would they know they NEED to?
If we were to SEND a signal to lets say the
planets discoverd by Kepler, would we use
simple radiosignals. Dont think so. 20ly,
radiosignal.. We would probobly try to
think of some FASTER way. .
Think of a faster way we are using the speed of light so what have you got.
Yea, thats like saying:
We have Iron and we have copper.
Can make ony a IRON axe OR a COPPER axe.
And then NOT knowing, theres a little thing called.
Alloyes...
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Think of a faster way we are using the speed of light so what have you got.
A 'gravity phone' much faster than light