Hollow Earth Theory Using Cold Fusion as evidence of the possiblity.

reply to post by tpaine1809

Using a combination of pseudo science and modern science. This will take a great deal of time.

We don't accept "pseudo science". Another word for 'pseudo' is 'false' or 'fake'.

Are you really going to convince us with fake science?

Originally posted by tpaine1809
reply to post by butcherguy

 

I said I think it could be made of palladium please stop putting words into my mouth.

We're not doing that. If you THINK it, then the rest of what you THINK is questionable.

reply to post by tpaine1809


Hopefully you get back to me because isn't he the one this theory originated with???

Originally posted by tpaine1809
reply to post by ProudBird

 

I have no ambitions of fame or glory. For all I care if one of you put my ideas into motion and changed the world I would be glad to let you take all the credit.

No, we're going to let you take the money for the comedy act.

Respect paid where it is earned, or lack thereof, I say.

This hollow earth that we are in must be damn big. I say that because of the speeds that we have measured other galaxies traveling in relationship to our own Milky Way. They used accepted scientific means of measuring those speeds, so I guess that is unacceptable here?

Wait...I just realised. You're the guy who wrote this thread.

Cheerio troll.

Originally posted by Starchild23
...uh, what?

I think the moon is made entirely of palladium

This is a line taken directly from your video. Are you serious? You're not? You sure...okay. Whew, almost had me.

The moon is not made of pure palladium, and this line has single-handedly sacrificed every God-willing chance you had of being taken seriously.

A good day to you sir...hopefully, you have more luck with your "theory", as it were.

edit on CSundaypm333350f50America/Chicago12 by Starchild23 because: (no reason given)

The moon does produce a metallic ringing when you crash things into it and palladium is a metal. I'm not an expert...just throwing that out there.
And I'm back on topic. You're welcome.

reply to post by HallamFoe


Well thank you for that little nugget!

Makes the picture a little different for me. A star for you.

ETA: I am glad my IQ wasn't 143 at age 5..... Seems it all goes out the window later!

reply to post by tpaine1809

I do not want acceptance. I only ask to explore it as a possibility. I cannot fully develop my ideas if I am unwilling to accept it. You however have no reason to accept it and I have given you none. I only ask that you explore it.

Don't bother replying, because I am not returning to this thread.


But before I go, here is a simple tip which may be helpful in the future:
If you want others to explore a theory, then maybe you should explain that theory.




bye bye

I understand what you're trying to explain...

But ... I think that what you're really starting to understand is the real precession of the equinoxes. Not caused by the earth gyroscopic precession but the gyroscopic precession of the solar system. Two Suns rotating around each other, one bigger then the other. The dominant brother the Sun having a less elliptical orbit and the Smaller brother a very long and elliptical Orbit.



I do believe that your right about the Hollow Earth. The centrifugal force works one way and the magnetic attraction the other forming the outer layer. I do not agree with you about the inner earth. You mention the Rodain Coil and that's very important. If you look at some of the experiments you'll notice what happens to a magnetic sphere in the middle of a rodin coil. The earth rotation is caused by ....







All the best...

reply to post by Starchild23


The earth is not solid. It contains a molten liquid core, if science is to be believed.

Originally posted by ladyteeny
don't take any notice about personal attacks on your appearance... for a start you're quite cute, and secondly people that judge based on looks are obviously repressed idiots

No, actually they are superficial, tend to be narccissistic and sociopathic as they tend to clasify different people as different objects of desire, disdain or something to be ignored. Just thought I would clear that up.

A brain is a brain, if it can do its job, the vehicle matters not.

Cheers - Dave

The earth is solid LOL Most of you are worse than the OP. The earth is "believed"

reply to post by ladyteeny


Star for you for the positive push.

But something more must be added or we can get into the delusion that looks do not matter. How anything presents it self is the first information the observer gets, of course that looks should not alone define anything but the problem is of perception, what the observer expects and what the object of observation intends to transmit, it is part of how every thing communicates in our reality and in this case it is instantaneous. From flowers and insects to mankind.

What one should discard is the cultural luggage that shapes what we observe, that is, we should not comply with how society, that is controlled by a minority, attempts to dictate what is acceptable and good and realize that what is popular is not often what people like, need or want but what the media presents to the masses.

Culture alters perceptions

Tattoos today are starting to imply charisma, enhanced individuality (body piercings not included that is just going overboard), one does not need a tattoo to indicate a need for unconformity...

Skinny people indicate mental or heal problems, nervousness and lack of any coping ability outside of urban centers.

The next step is to appreciate people with long hair and regain the appreciation not only facial hair (in man) but body hair (to some degree at least), this is an indication of good health.

In any case moderation is the rule to fallow in all aspects of life, the looks of things are just details... Like the saying "Looks aren't everything", "Beauty is ephemeral" and "Don't judge a book by its cover"...

Originally posted by Starchild23

I repeat, if the possibility were anything other than an ill-grounded, passing theory, CNN would be all over it by now. After all, a hollow Earth would be pretty big news.

do you understand why people come to ATS?

I dont care how you look, i dont care where you used to work...

i do care when someone is so sure they have a theory yet cannot be bothered to post the damn transcript for information on this website but instead whacks up a youtube video!!

see if you really really want to convince people, write it down n let us read... i refuse to look through youtube videos for peoples explanations.


furthermore.. your opening bit about cold fusion doesnt make any sense in that... alot of people know quite alot about it.
anything more is guess work and thus could literally be anything as you are clearly aware to debunk such a thought would require the type of effort that you clearly wont get on this site as the users are the kind of people who JUST POST VIDEO'S!!!!!


i eagerly await you transcript as i am interest in both cold fusion and hollow earth theories

reply to post by biggmoneyme


Not if you take inverted space-time into account. Its the same distance just inward, with the inverse effect of gravity (repulsion) all the answers are really simple if you'll only...look out side the box

I'm fine with the hollow earth theory... but... now you're saying we're living inside the earth? On the inner side of the planet?

Ok, so remember when I said on the other thread that I would not dismiss and try to understand any theory unless it was utterly stupid?

I hope so, cause his is utterly stupid.

Originally posted by Jazz87
I have no knowledge to claim what your saying is false or true...

But when I first ran into the "Hollow Earth theory" I couldn't stop thinking about it, not because it made perfect sense, because like I said I don't know enough.. But isn't the earth being solid also a theory?

The other thing that wouldn't let disregard the theory was Admiral Byrd. How can we take what he said and wrote down as just a crazy out of the blue idea and EXPERIENCE.. I mean he was real, he wrote it down, he seemed to be highly respected in the Government and Navy. From what I read he lead the Naval exploration to the North Pole and that's where the theory starts. (google Admiral Byrd and have fun reading..)

But that alone wont let me throw away a theory as fascinating as the Hollow Earth. Just my thoughts.

Actually, Admiral Byrd never made those claims directly. His supposed diary surfaced sometime after his death and is thought to be a forgery by some. During the time he was supposedly having his north pole adventures, he was actually at the south pole with operation highjump.

Sorry if this was said earlier, got tired of reading so many pages of off topic bs.

reply to post by tpaine1809


I only have one question. Could you please explain to me how you have two suns inside a sphere chasing one another and work out having darkness anywhere inside that sphere.

Sorry two questions. In one of you other videos you state that Orion's belt is a reflection of the pyramids. Have you decided this isn't the case? If so does this not present a problem explaining the rest of the stars seen in the night sky?