It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
FOREIGN Minister Kevin Rudd has arrived in Israel with a blunt message: allow international inspectors into your nuclear facility.
He has also called on Israel to stop building in Jewish settlements in both the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
Israeli officials were not surprised by Mr Rudd's call for Israel to sign the NPT but were taken aback by his call for IAEA inspections. One high-ranking Israeli official said: "I don't remember any Australian minister saying (Israel's) facilities should be put under inspection."
Another Israeli official, who spoke on the condition he not be named, said: "It is very surprising; first of all, as we are not signatories to the NPT we are not bound by its obligations;
and, secondly, the NPT has proven to be ineffective. Its signatories include Iran, Syria, Libya and Iraq, which should speak for itself.
Originally posted by STEADFast
come on, get real...
better look under your bed for some of those sneaky jews, they might try to steal your bedsheets.
Originally posted by WozaMeathed
Originally posted by STEADFast
come on, get real...
better look under your bed for some of those sneaky jews, they might try to steal your bedsheets.
Is that your best arguement against my thoughts?
Cause if it is, well,,, that is a pathetic rebuttal.
edit on 11-2-2012 by WozaMeathed because: (no reason given)
I think that the only reason former PM Rudd lost his support of ministers in Australia is because his stance on Israel and Israels unseen hold over our Aussie government.
And i think that has alot to do with what is happening in the middle east today.
Originally posted by Koffee
Originally posted by WozaMeathed
Originally posted by STEADFast
come on, get real...
better look under your bed for some of those sneaky jews, they might try to steal your bedsheets.
Is that your best arguement against my thoughts?
Cause if it is, well,,, that is a pathetic rebuttal.
edit on 11-2-2012 by WozaMeathed because: (no reason given)
Well your main argument is this:
I think that the only reason former PM Rudd lost his support of ministers in Australia is because his stance on Israel and Israels unseen hold over our Aussie government.
And i think that has alot to do with what is happening in the middle east today.
Which uhm doesn't have anything to back it up, you give quotes of Rudd's position but you don't anything to showcase that it was actually the reason why he lost power. You know quote somebody of saying this is the reason why or evidence that they actually support it.
Originally posted by Droidinvoid
You only have to look at CFI Conservative Friends of Israel .
David Cameron is bending over backwards for the zionist elite in the UK.
No, Zionist money is calling the shots all over the world.
Zionist big money is calling the shots all over the western world
We all know that Israel DO have nuclear weapons and that they are full of s*** when they say that they dont.
Israel refuses to confirm that it even has nuclear weapons, but foreign intelligence analysts familiar with the program believe Israel has just over 200 nuclear warheads at its facility in Dimona in southern Israel.
Israel has nuclear weapons but will not place a figure on them. yet they seek to know Irans stockpile of invisible warheads
[ Israel's nuclear facility should be subject to IAEA inspection. ]
Originally posted by WozaMeathed
Originally posted by Koffee
Originally posted by WozaMeathed
Originally posted by STEADFast
come on, get real...
better look under your bed for some of those sneaky jews, they might try to steal your bedsheets.
Is that your best arguement against my thoughts?
Cause if it is, well,,, that is a pathetic rebuttal.
edit on 11-2-2012 by WozaMeathed because: (no reason given)
Well your main argument is this:
I think that the only reason former PM Rudd lost his support of ministers in Australia is because his stance on Israel and Israels unseen hold over our Aussie government.
And i think that has alot to do with what is happening in the middle east today.
Which uhm doesn't have anything to back it up, you give quotes of Rudd's position but you don't anything to showcase that it was actually the reason why he lost power. You know quote somebody of saying this is the reason why or evidence that they actually support it.
UHM,,,,,,,, Yes i think it does.
I stated that i feel Rudd was ousted from power due to his thoughts and stance on palestine and his thoughts that nuclear Inspectors should be allowed to inspect Israels nuclear program of which i quoted.
Did you actually read the article link i posted?
I guess not, or you wouldnt have asked your questions.
So This is why i posted this in conspiracies.
Thanks for your reply
THE Rudd government defied departmental advice telling it to support Israel in a 2010 United Nations vote after Israeli spies used forged Australian passports in a political assassination, leaked US embassy cables suggest.
The government last year expelled a senior Israeli diplomat from Canberra after it emerged the spies had used four faked Australian passports to enter Dubai to kill senior Hamas official Mahmoud al-Mabhouh.
Just days after the story broke, Australia abstained from a United Nations vote demanding Israel and Palestine investigate claims in the so-called Goldstone Report that war crimes were committed during the 2008-09 Gaza assault.
Then-prime minister Kevin Rudd said at the time that Australia's failure to vote against the move had nothing to do with tensions incited by the passport scandal.
"The Australian government always reviews UN General Assembly and Security Council resolutions on their merits," Mr Rudd said at the time.
...But a new cable from the US embassy in Canberra -- leaked to the Wikileaks website and published today -- suggests otherwise.
The confidential cable dated February 25, 2010 -- the day the passports story first broke -- shows the embassy believed Australia would vote against the resolution despite its anger.
"The recent revelations that suspected Mossad agents used fake Australian passports to enter Dubai and kill a Hamas commander have made this decision more complicated," the cable notes.
The cable quotes senior Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) official Joel McGregor as saying Australian officials were "furious" all the way up the chain of command.
"In the wake of the revelations from Dubai, the government is in no hurry to reassure Israel of its support."
Originally posted by Seagle
Lets not forget that Rudd was the only one too stand up and publicly vent his outrage at Israel forging Australian passports to use in a Moussad hit. He expelled an Israeli diplomat from canberra. It was around this time that Obama cancelled a couple of trips to Australia as I well I believe.
Link to full story
Originally posted by Droidinvoid
Anyone in politics who stands against , speaks against the nation of Israel , would be deaf , dumb and blind not to know what response he / she would get . After reading extensively regarding the Rothschild's , time and again it say's that they hi-jacked the jewish faith and hide behind it , when people question the machinations of how they do business , they yell anti semite at the questioner.
A study of these and similar events reveals a personality profile, not just of the Rothschilds, but of that special breed of international financiers whose success typically is built upon certain character traits. These include cold objectivity, immunity to patriotism, and indifference to the human condition.
The Rothschild Formula may be briefly summarized as follows:
1. War is the ultimate discipline to any government. If it can successfully meet the challenge of war, it will survive. If it cannot, it will perish. All else is secondary. The sanctity of its laws, the prosperity of its citizens and the solvency of its treasury will be quickly sacrificed by any government in its primal act of self-survival.
2. All that is necessary, therefore, to insure that a government will maintain or expand its debt is to involve it in war or the threat of war. The greater the threat and the more destructive the war, the greater the need for debt.
3. To involve a country in war or the threat of war, it will be necessary for it to have enemies with credible military might. If such enemies already exist, all the better. If they exist but lack military strength, it will be necessary to provide them the money to build their war machine. If an enemy does not exist at all, then it will be necessary to create one by financing the rise of a hostile regime.
4. The ultimate obstacle is a government which declines to finance its wars through debt. Although this seldom happens, when it does, it will be necessary to encourage internal political opposition, insurrection or revolution to replace that government with one that is more compliant to our will. The assassination of heads of state could play an important role in this process.
5. No nation can be allowed to remain militarily stronger than its adversaries, for that could lead to peace and a reduction of debt. To accomplish this balance of power, it may be necessary to finance both sides of the conflict. Unless one of the combatants is hostile to our interests and therefore, must be destroyed, neither side should be allowed a decisive victory or defeat. While we must always proclaim the virtues of peace, the unspoken objective is perpetual war.
Originally posted by Funk bunyip
The K-man seems to be gaining momentum again, not hard against Gillard i guess. Power to him, i like the guy.
'nuff said.