It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Kenrichaed
People keep saying that, the news keeps reporting it, but it's just not true.
We don't know where the delegates are going to go. It is a projection of where they would go if the delegate was a hardcore supporter of the winner of that state which is not always the case in an election with no clear cut winner. No matter how hard they want Romney to be, he just isn't yet.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Kenrichaed
You mean an election year with tight races on both sides is in anyway similar to an election year where a sitting president is running unopposed while on the other side an establishment candidate is up against a huge grassroots movement for a candidate using an atypical election strategy?
I can honestly say I don't see it.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Paul needs to start winning States soon if he wishes to become relevant in this race, so Maine is important to him and so is Washington State where he is supposedly doing well in campaigning. If Paul comes anything but first in Maine, there'll be no way to spin it as this was only a two man race.
I'm having a hard time finding polling for Maine.... maybe because it's such a minor state to the GOP.
I'm having a hard time finding polling for Maine.... maybe because it's such a minor state to the GOP.
Originally posted by NeoVain
reply to post by Southern Guardian
I'm having a hard time finding polling for Maine.... maybe because it's such a minor state to the GOP.
I have also noticed this... Unusually low coverage... Almost smells like a non-issue?
Coincidentally this seem to be the first one Ron Paul is actually winning... Might there be a relation?
Coincidentally this seem to be the first one Ron Paul is actually winning... Might there be a relation?
Originally posted by freedom12
reply to post by NeoVain
Well, in a couple hours, CNN will have their big fancy election room, with all them screens, John King on his computer map showing you the breakdownm county by county, and 12 analysts telling you why Ron Paul's victory in Maine doesn't mean anything at all!
I can't wait.....LOL. It'll be great seeing Ronny give his victory speech!
"Ron Paul has made a strong play for Maine," the Associated Press reports, "making it essentially a two-man contest since Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum aren't actively competing there." Meanwhile, according to AP, Mitt Romney's campaign and affiliated super PAC have been "all but absent" from Maine with a "virtually nonexistent" television advertising presence.
Finally, Public Policy Polling (PPP), the Democratic-affiliated firm that conducted polls for the earlier caucuses but conducted a recent tracking poll in Maine, posted an analysis casting some doubt on the conventional wisdom that Romney should run strong in a state like Maine due to its proximity to New Hampshire (which Romney won by a comfortable margin) and Massachusetts (where Romney served as Governor).
Originally posted by freedom12
reply to post by Southern Guardian
Cool!
So while you attempt to discredit Dr Paul and minimize him, you have already awarded him with the win today?
Yeah, he's 0 for 1 in Presidential races so far, but he's won how many times in Texas?
Yep, this will be a special State for Paul and his supporters, the first State in Paul's 30 year career in politics that he actually won:
Originally posted by freedom12
reply to post by Southern Guardian
Not "getting hostile" sir.
You did say-
It is kinda hard to "win states" when you're running for a House of Rep seat !