It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Long Fight Ends Over Arrests For Loitering
Nearly 30 years of court battles over illegal arrests for loitering in New York City came to an end this week as a federal judge approved a class-action settlement that will include a $15 million payment by the city and an unusual promise that officials will work to expunge thousands of convictions.
The settlement came after a federal judge held the city in contempt in 2010 for “obstinance and uncooperativeness,” as the police continued for years to make arrests under laws that had been declared unconstitutional. The laws had banned loitering to panhandle or to search for a sex partner, or while in a bus or train station.
Federal and state courts struck down those laws between 1983 and 1993 as violating First Amendment rights, but some 22,000 people were charged with the offenses from 1983 to 2012.
Katie Rosenfeld, one of the lawyers who filed the suit, said it had brought accountability. “All of the people who got charged under these statutes had not very much power: homeless people, gay people, marginalized people, vulnerable people,” she said.
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
city's and their police forces are there for one reason and one reason only, to make additional revenue. police do not prevent crime nor create safety for anyone, they generate revenue and make reports after crimes are committed.
Katie Rosenfeld, one of the lawyers who filed the suit, said it had brought accountability. “All of the people who got charged under these statutes had not very much power: homeless people, gay people, marginalized people, vulnerable people,” she said.
Originally posted by JoshF
Katie Rosenfeld, one of the lawyers who filed the suit, said it had brought accountability. “All of the people who got charged under these statutes had not very much power: homeless people, gay people, marginalized people, vulnerable people,” she said.
I love the type of crap people will allow others to say when they are working in their favor. Did anyone else notice that she put Gay people right down there with homeless people. If the mayor made a comment like that then people would be crying to get him thrown out of office.edit on 9-2-2012 by JoshF because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by groingrinder
Originally posted by JoshF
Katie Rosenfeld, one of the lawyers who filed the suit, said it had brought accountability. “All of the people who got charged under these statutes had not very much power: homeless people, gay people, marginalized people, vulnerable people,” she said.
I love the type of crap people will allow others to say when they are working in their favor. Did anyone else notice that she put Gay people right down there with homeless people. If the mayor made a comment like that then people would be crying to get him thrown out of office.edit on 9-2-2012 by JoshF because: (no reason given)
I do not understand your point. Gay folks were victimized. Homeless folks were victimized. How is mentioning that fact hurting gays?
Originally posted by Kali74
It also bothers me that no one seems outraged about this beyond the tax dollar issue. Thirty years ago the applicable (to this thread) laws were ruled unconstitutional, so for 30 years the NYPD and probably a lot more police departments nationwide have on a somewhat regular basis, violated citizens Constitutional rights.