Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel

reply to post by r3axion

President Obama's state of the union was quickly followed by a second one in Afghanistan. President Karzai finally convened the newly-elected parliament with a Kennedyesque "Ask not what Afghanistan can do for you, ask what you can do for Afghanistan." He had been resisting American pressure to open parliament for months, preferring to rule by presidential decree. His capitulation marks a big success for the Obama administration.

Yet the administration's enthusiasm for checks-and-balances stops at the Afghan border. When President Obama dropped a word about Afghanistan in his own address, he spoke as if Congress were merely a passive bystander. He repeated his early decision to begin withdrawal this coming July, but failed even to mention that the troops' final departure would be delayed until 2014, and that Vice President Biden has suggested that we would be continuing to provide support, of an unspecified kind, long afterwards – all without involving Congress .

www.guardian.co.uk...

reply to post by dalek



Yep.

If this is not true, where are the Iranian news sources denying the enrichment allegations? Where are the Iranian news sources denying underground nuclear facilities? Better yet, where are the statements by Ahmedinejad or the Supreme Leader denying this?

That's right, you guessed it, there are none. Because Iran is like a child with something to hide.

Originally posted by casenately
reply to post by r3axion

 

President Obama's state of the union was quickly followed by a second one in Afghanistan. President Karzai finally convened the newly-elected parliament with a Kennedyesque "Ask not what Afghanistan can do for you, ask what you can do for Afghanistan." He had been resisting American pressure to open parliament for months, preferring to rule by presidential decree. His capitulation marks a big success for the Obama administration.

Yet the administration's enthusiasm for checks-and-balances stops at the Afghan border. When President Obama dropped a word about Afghanistan in his own address, he spoke as if Congress were merely a passive bystander. He repeated his early decision to begin withdrawal this coming July, but failed even to mention that the troops' final departure would be delayed until 2014, and that Vice President Biden has suggested that we would be continuing to provide support, of an unspecified kind, long afterwards – all without involving Congress .

www.guardian.co.uk...

What does Obama have to do with anything?

Bush got us involved. Or did you forget about him?

reply to post by casenately

the Iraq Resolution or the Iraq War Resolution (formally the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 [1], Pub.L. 107-243, 116 Stat. 1498, enacted October 16, 2002, H.J.Res. 114) is a joint resolution (i.e., a law) passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No: 107-243, authorizing the Iraq War.

en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by r3axion


so I guess since they are not denying they are reptiles the might have that under the sleeve too huh.?

any facts or just more intuition?

BUNK

Robert Fisk: We've been here before – and it suits Israel that we never forget 'Nuclear Iran'

"The Israeli President warns us now that Iran is on the cusp of producing a nuclear weapon. Heaven preserve us. Yet we reporters do not mention that Shimon Peres, as Israeli Prime Minister, said exactly the same thing in 1996. That was 16 years ago. And we do not recall that the current Israeli PM, Benjamin Netanyahu, said in 1992 that Iran would have a nuclear bomb by 1999. That would be 13 years ago. Same old story."

www.independent.co.uk... 1.html

Talk about hitting the nail on the head...

reply to post by r3axion


yeah so when does it end, what if there is 1 terrorist?

do we stay, invade neighboring countries like in Nam?

Congress said have war in the middle east forever or until you get tired of it?

NO
invade, no WMDs, no terrorists LEAVE

that was the plan. not perpetual war for free...

it's not a golden ticket. They have not asked for any powers they have taken it upon executive privilege to decide what they share based on national security...FROM CONGRESS!!!

they might share Intel with the enemy????

Originally posted by casenately
reply to post by r3axion

 

so I guess since they are not denying they are reptiles the might have that under the sleeve too huh.?

any facts or just more intuition?

BUNK

If someone is accusing you of enriching uranium to 20%, or accusing you of having hidden facilities? would you not deny it? On the contrary, this has been reported on by Saudi Arabia

english.alarabiya.net...

Iran is believed to be expanding uranium enrichment activity deep inside a mountain, diplomatic sources said on Monday, a move likely to add to tension with Western powers that suspect Tehran is seeking nuclear weapons capability, as the U.S. and eight other countries were staging a major amphibious exercise, fighting an Iran-like fictional enemy.

Iran last month confirmed it had begun refining uranium to a fissile concentration of 20 percent at Fordow, shifting its highest-grade enrichment from an above-ground location to better protect it against any strikes by Israel or the United States.

Your brain is bunk. You're so in denial that it's getting sad.

I think we're done here.

Originally posted by casenately
reply to post by r3axion

 

yeah so when does it end, what if there is 1 terrorist?

do we stay, invade neighboring countries like in Nam?

Congress said have war in the middle east forever or until you get tired of it?

NO
invade, no WMDs, no terrorists LEAVE

that was the plan. not perpetual war for free...

it's not a golden ticket. They have not asked for any powers they have taken it upon executive privilege to decide what they share based on national security...FROM CONGRESS!!!

they might share Intel with the enemy????

That was the plan? I think you're wrong on that one. Did you even READ THE RESOLUTIONS? I'm assuming not, as you don't read anything that's handed to you and remain in LALA land.

The Authorization for Use of Military Force [1] is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress on September 14, 2001, authorizing the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the attacks on September 11, 2001. The authorization granted the President the authority to use all "necessary and appropriate force" against those whom he determined "planned, authorized, committed or aided" the September 11th attacks, or who harbored said persons or groups. The AUMF was signed by President George W. Bush on September 18, 2001.

en.wikipedia.org...


"oh but congress is innocent!" They gave him a TICKET TO WAR.

If they didn't know that what was going on was LEGAL because of WHAT THEY SIGNED, then they would IMPEACH the president. Comprende, esse?

reply to post by r3axion




ok so you gave up on EVERYTHING else as it was UNPROVBLE and moved onto this for what....STAY ON TOPIC


I am still waiting for that list sparky.,..

I get you want to show face but...you are seeming desperate

Originally posted by casenately
reply to post by r3axion

 

ok so you gave up on EVERYTHING else as it was UNPROVBLE and moved onto this for what....STAY ON TOPIC


I am still waiting for that list sparky.,..

I get you want to show face but...you are seeming desparate:

Are you INSANE? YOU replied to ME. ROFL

www.abovetopsecret.com...

To a comment that wasn't even directed towards you!
Psychological projection much?

reply to post by Xcathdra

When the article appears on Farsnews, which is run by the Revolutionary Guards who answer directly to the Ayatollah, do you really think they are going to post something the Ayatollah never said?

Farnews is official as far as Iran goes, since you know, they own it.

If the MSM carried it, people would only continue their claims of western propaganda. OI course some people already are making that claim while apparently doing their best to ignore the Farsnews article.

reply to post by Xcathdra

Please explain how this is fake. Is the Farsnews a front for the CIA or Mossad? Did members of the IRG go bonkers and decide to attribute words to their Supreme Leader that he never said?

Please, by all means, show us how Farsnews, which is owned by the IRG who answer directly to the Ayatollah, is posting false information.

repeat from post: www.abovetopsecret.com...
A whois search has indicated that the FARSnews may not be what we seem to think.

FARS-Whois
use "farsnews.com" for the search

Registrant:
c/o FARSNEWS.COM
P.O. Box 821650
Vancouver, WA 98682
US

Registrar: DOTREGISTRAR
Domain Name: FARSNEWS.COM
Created on: 21-JAN-03
Expires on: 21-JAN-19
Last Updated on: 17-JAN-12

Administrative Contact:
[email protected]
c/o FARSNEWS.COM
P.O. Box 821650
Vancouver, WA 98682
US
+1.360-449-5933

Technical Contact:
[email protected]
c/o FARSNEWS.COM
P.O. Box 821650
Vancouver, WA 98682
US
+1.360-449-5933


Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.FARSNEWS.COM
NS2.FARSNEWS.COM
NS3.FARSNEWS.COM

This listing is a Whois Privacy Customer. Mail correspondence to this
address must be sent via USPS Express Mail(TM) or USPS Certified
Mail(R); all other mail will not be processed. Be sure to include
the domain name in the address.

End of Whois Information


Host farsnews.com
Location TR, Turkey
City Mars, 65 -
Organization Mars-Customer
ISP Hosting Internet Hizmetleri Ltd Sti
AS Number AS42910 Hosting Internet Hizmetleri Ltd Sti

reply to post by Xcathdra

Also if you type in farsnews.ir it takes you to the farsnews.com with no redirect. Or are you suggesting Turkey somehoe conrols Farsnews and is a front for some alphabet agency?

From the WND article

Reza Kahlili is a pseudonym for a former CIA operative in Iran’s Revolutionary Guard and author of the award-winning book, “A Time to Betray.” He is a senior fellow with EMPact America and teaches at the U.S. Department of Defense’s Joint Counterintelligence Training Academy.

Reza Kahlili is the author of the article.

FARS may very well be a link to the CIA/Mossad/MI6 cartel.

FARS "ownership" is not clear, but they seem to be American from whois.
The hosting is in Turkey.

The U.S. and Turkey are NATO members.

The "quotes" from the Iranian leaders don't seem to be confirmed either.

The article could be a "Hollywood" style production.

This may be a "training" mission for internet watchers who look for threatening material.

reply to post by r3axion


so again....why are you here?

do you have anything else to offer the conversation....prove anything that has been proven wrong?

new EVIDENCE??

no....

ok

reply to post by casenately


All I ever replied to was the fact you said 20% enrichment is incapable of creating weapons...in which I provided scientific sources to the contrary. You carried on the argument from there instead of simply admitting you were wrong and it can be done....

All roads lead to Washington... Here's a short USA - Iran History lesson.

reply to post by r3axion



OK fair enough....but that is speculation.

There is NO proof that Iran has done this for weapons, just that they could. Not even worth mentioning unless you are going to show me a nuke or a weapon. They do have a navy and a reactors which is the reason they would use it as they say and EVERYONE ACCEPTED. That says nothing but implies...like always,....implies ....but says nothing.


Show me where they said we are using this for a nuke. Why hide this when they have hidden nothing. They have defied everyone why not think they would for this too. They are already under sanction and being bothered by our intelligence services, why hide it....?

answer please in the form of speculation please facts not necessary. please find the most bias representation of Islam you can and say this is them...that will do ...you don't even have to find quotes of people saying them. The fact they exists is enough to make you an expert about their intent.

reply to post by casenately


Okay but if this was for peaceful purposes why would they be worried about their facilities being bombed? They wouldn't have to worry if they would allow inspections to verify their productions are for peaceful purposes only.

It's not difficult to do. With everyone accusing them of trying to obtain nuclear weapons, wouldn't the best thing for them to do be to prove it?

reply to post by r3axion


BECAUSE PEOPLE LIKE YOU say they are the anti Christ and are constantly threatened, They always find CIA in their country and they are always the object of sabotage.....ALL countries worth a damn build underground....it's safer too....as well as more secure....

We are pissed we can't get at them are you kidding me....that's why...

again more INTENTION


NOT FACTS

I am glad I found an expert on this...
listen my wife saw me looking at the breasts of a tall blond yesterday do you think her intention when she said she didn't like that was that infact that she wanted to kill be because of it?


what do you think doc?

Do I have a case?

reply to post by casenately


I'm not threatened by Iran at all, nor did I say they are the antichrist. In fact if I recall correctly I told you earlier I don't think the US should be involved with this, and that this is a problem between Israel an Iran.

It's 3:30 here and I'm getting to bed. Later.

And yeah you have a case. Either side does. It depends on how you look at it.

reply to post by r3axion


no you said their religion like all people´s religion made them backwards and worthy of letting them both die and be wiped off the map.

I see we are still talking but you have not offered new facts just more BS

ANYTHING?