It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by imnothereru
Originally posted by Monkeygod333
To the two going at it above. There are actually three different versions of when Bush came to hear about the news. Three, all of them told by Bush himself. Which makes the argument above useless really.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
It actually proves the point that he was lying,
Not that it really needs more proof, i mean it is a bit too obvious, of course, unless you are naive enough to fall for something like that.
Originally posted by Monkeygod333
To the two going at it above. There are actually three different versions of when Bush came to hear about the news. Three, all of them told by Bush himself. Which makes the argument above useless really.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
reply to post by Rafe_
That's great. Actually, that's what I thought. You're dodging my point and going after straw men. I get it. Don't answer my question.
So you think Bush is lying because it would have been impossible that a TV was on at the school showing the breaking news at the WTC. Okay. Genius point, Sherlock. That's simply impossible.edit on 9-2-2012 by lunarasparagus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
reply to post by Rafe_
Look mate, the only hole here is yours. It seems my point was beyond your comprehension. I never deviated from it, nor contradicted myself. You simply don't get it. I'll simplify it for you.
Bush said to a public audience:
" . . . And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on".
Below you will see two possible interpretations of this statement. Please pick the one you believe probably is the most accurate.
1) Bush intended to tell his audience that he had seen the first plane strike live on T.V.
2) Bush used poor syntax. He meant to say, "I saw [that] an airplane hit the tower".
Do you get it?
I pick number 2.
Originally posted by ThePeopleParty
I think the idea was for us to see it.
But you never know.
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
Originally posted by Rafe_
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
reply to post by Rafe_
That's great. Actually, that's what I thought. You're dodging my point and going after straw men. I get it. Don't answer my question.
So you think Bush is lying because it would have been impossible that a TV was on at the school showing the breaking news at the WTC. Okay. Genius point, Sherlock. That's simply impossible.edit on 9-2-2012 by lunarasparagus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
reply to post by Rafe_
Look mate, the only hole here is yours. It seems my point was beyond your comprehension. I never deviated from it, nor contradicted myself. You simply don't get it. I'll simplify it for you.
Bush said to a public audience:
" . . . And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on".
Below you will see two possible interpretations of this statement. Please pick the one you believe probably is the most accurate.
1) Bush intended to tell his audience that he had seen the first plane strike live on T.V.
2) Bush used poor syntax. He meant to say, "I saw [that] an airplane hit the tower".
Do you get it?
I pick number 2.
ok.
You pick number 2
2) Bush used poor syntax. He meant to say, "I saw [that] an airplane hit the tower".
So then you claim you did not say he saw the first plane hit (recorded in this very thread but ok.).
you say he saw A plane hit.Thus that would have meant that he saw the second plane hit (The one that took away any suspicion that it was not a freak accident) and after seeing and hearing that he still proceeded to enter the classroom and sit there reading a book with little children. Following that then it seems it was still necessary for andrew card to notify bush of the attack on america.Which bush just saw with his own 2 eyes on tv.
All this of course according to you.
Remember this. These are the implications of what you just wrote.
I doubt you can spin this in your favor,it is not the first time you failed.
Goddam, you're obtuse.
I never said he saw a plane hit.
Did your mom have any children that lived?
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
reply to post by Rafe_
1) Bush intended to tell his audience that he had seen the first plane strike live on T.V.
2) Bush used poor syntax. He meant to say, "I saw [that] an airplane hit the tower".
Do you get it?
I pick number 2.
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
Originally posted by Monkeygod333
To the two going at it above. There are actually three different versions of when Bush came to hear about the news. Three, all of them told by Bush himself. Which makes the argument above useless really.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
The argument was not about when Bush came to hear the news. It was about what he meant when he said, "I saw a plane hit the tower"--at least that's what it was supposed to be about until I discovered I was arguing with a middle-schooler.
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
Goddam, you're obtuse.
I never said he saw a plane hit.
Did your mom have any children that lived?
Originally posted by lunarasparagus
reply to post by imnothereru
You must be the successful sibling he was talking about.
Originally posted by ICanThink
OK, OS guys, now you have something harder to debunk:
Town Hall Forum on Economy in California.
"I was sitting there, and my Chief of Staff -- well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on..."
George certainly has problem with his English when it comes to 9/11
Next time pick a president with better brains and acting skills.
Originally posted by ICanThink
No he specifically says he saw it on TV: "The TV was obviously on", "There was a TV set on".
Why he would lie? We all know George is a simple honest guy.
Originally posted by Rafe_
Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
reply to post by ICanThink
He could quite easily have meant that he saw that an aeroplane had hit the tower.
You know ,there is a very good reason why that piece was aired with the starting comment And you don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to wonder exactly what president George w.Bush knew about the attacks....and when he knew it..