It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Individuals differ from one another in their ability to understand complex ideas, to adapt effectively to the environment, to learn from experience, to engage in various forms of reasoning, to overcome obstacles by taking thought. Although these individual differences can be substantial, they are never entirely consistent: a given person's intellectual performance will vary on different occasions, in different domains, as judged by different criteria. Concepts of "intelligence" are attempts to clarify and organize this complex set of phenomena.
One person may do relatively better on verbal than on spatial items, for example, while another may show the opposite pattern. Nevertheless, subtests measuring different abilities tend to be positively correlated: people who score high on one such subtest are likely to be above average on others as well. These complex patterns of correlation can be clarified by factor analysis, but the results of such analyses are often controversial themselves.
By convention, overall intelligence test scores are usuallv converted to a scale in which the mean is 100 and the standard deviation is 15. (The standard deviation is a measure of the variability of the distribution of scores.) Approximately 95% of the population has scores within two standard deviations of the mean, i.e. between 70 and 130. For historical reasons, the term "IQ" is often used to describe scores on tests of intelligence.
link
Attendance at school is both a dependent and an independent variable in relation to intelligence. On the one hand, children with higher test scores are less likely to drop out, more likely to be promoted from grade to grade and then to attend college. Thus the number of years of education that adults complete is roughly predictable from their childhood scores on intelligence tests. On the other hand schooling itself changes mental abilities, including those abilities measured on psychometric tests. This is obvious for tests like the SAT that are explicitly designed to assess school learning, but it is almost equally true of intelligence tests themselves.
The Promise Of America Is. . . Socialism? That’s exactly what is being taught in many American public schools.
Under the guise of teaching children to read, the seeds of Socialism are being planted within the minds of young children. Do you believe that the Preamble to the Constitution of the United States mandates the following?
“The People’s basic needs must be met in a country. Needs for housing, education, transportation, and health care overseen by our government system.”
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
link
Nearly three-quarters of faculty members at U.S. colleges and universities describe themselves as liberals, and at elite schools, the proportion is 87 percent, a survey has found.
link
Already inclined toward liberalism, college freshmen are leaning even farther left on key political issues, a nationwide survey of first-year students has found.
An all-time high of 71.3 percent of the new students support same-sex marriage, 6.4 percentage points higher than in 2009, according to the annual survey of more than 200,000 freshmen conducted by UCLA's Higher Education Research Institute.
Nearly 43 percent of conservative freshmen said gays and lesbians should be allowed to marry.
Originally posted by freethinker123
Interesting post, its a shame you had to spoil it at the end with opinionated, petty name calling.in support of your chosen ideology.
In my opinion the most intelligent people are neither liberal or conservative - they do not need a reference to a political ideology in order to have one. In support of this note that you have those that support Ron Paul and yet are at least slightly sympathetic to the Occupy ideals. There are those that are against universal coverage of the Obamacare type, but also support the right to choose. People are complex and we should not fall into the trap of lining up behind the two main political parties and their ideologies just because they want us to.
The ones that are taking the United out of the United States are those that are partisan and constantly try to manipulate people into being cheerleaders for one of the two groups.
Originally posted by freethinker123
Interesting post, its a shame you had to spoil it at the end with opinionated, petty name calling.in support of your chosen ideology.
In my opinion the most intelligent people are neither liberal or conservative - they do not need a reference to a political ideology in order to have one. In support of this note that you have those that support Ron Paul and yet are at least slightly sympathetic to the Occupy ideals. There are those that are against universal coverage of the Obamacare type, but also support the right to choose. People are complex and we should not fall into the trap of lining up behind the two main political parties and their ideologies just because they want us to.
The ones that are taking the United out of the United States are those that are partisan and constantly try to manipulate people into being cheerleaders for one of the two groups.
Neither of them are. If they are ignorant to label themselves either they lack the understanding to realize it doesn't matter whether you're a jackass or the pink elephant in the room. It's a big game of chess and you the citizens, aren't the ones playing.
But I commend your detailed post which i did not read, because i've come to understand over the years the political system is apart of the same damned plan with different sides to divide and manipulate people who still have faith in the government.
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Nice write up in your OP. But I believe that the left/right paradigm is a 20th century relic of western political thought. Intelligence is not a political thing that can be "conservative" or "liberal". The mass media complex really adores the left/right paradigm because they can get a bunch of fancy suits on tv spouting off their left/right agendas.
So, respectfully have to disagree with the premise. Intelligence does not factor in political views. A Nazi can be highly intelligent while he's shooting at defenseless women and children. American pilots can be intelligent while carpet bombing Viet Nam. And some very intelligent people believed that Iraq had WMD because of the Nigerian Yellow Cakes.
The intelligent man looks at all sides and trusts his ability to discern the truth from that. Political ideology, liberal or conservative crushes intelligence, violates critical thinking and creates an un-intelligent man.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
My impression is that liberals are stronger in thinking and conservatives stronger in doing.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
My impression is that liberals are stronger in thinking and conservatives stronger in doing.
I think that their are those set in their ways.The Liberal agenda is alive and well,in America. With the polarization of America because of Obama,Its no surprise these type of posts,are brought up.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
My impression is that liberals are stronger in thinking and conservatives stronger in doing.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by sonnny1
I think that their are those set in their ways.The Liberal agenda is alive and well,in America. With the polarization of America because of Obama,Its no surprise these type of posts,are brought up.
It has happened since Obama, I thought we were past this, the race pushers know what they are doing.
They don't even believe what they are saying.
edit on 052929p://bSaturday2012 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)