It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican I w
would have probably SAID to watch out further south than Washington.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Well the ocean temperature right now is about 45 degrees F (7.2 C) on the northern west coast, give or take a few. And it's colder the farther north you go. I don't suppose I have to point out what a nasty situation that would be if a tsunami decided to show up any time soon. Not only would people drown, but those trying to survive in the water would probably get hypothermia very quickly.
I don't understand why the USGS doesn't issue some kind of advisory or something. Why does it take some amateur like me to point out these patterns? Why are they so afraid to go out on a limb and be wrong?
As far as I'm concerned, the whole west coast USA is on red alert. And Vancouver, you are in no better position either.edit on Mon Feb 13th 2012 by TrueAmerican because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by skitzspiricy
Originally posted by JustMike
reply to post by zworld
Zworld, I originally was thinking you meant Trinidad as in Trinidad and Tobago. Took me a while to figure out you meant California. Then it made a great deal of sense.
I was going to say the exact same thing.
Was thinking, how did they feel it all the way over there?....Ahhhh There's a Trinidad CA.
edit on 13-2-2012 by skitzspiricy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Well, as you may have guessed, I have analyzed data now from that station, and I would have indeed issued an A2 if I had that data at the time I made that post. It fits my hypothetical criteria. And believe it or not, if I had that data, I would have probably SAID to watch out further south than Washington.
Things definitely showed at my key station. So I may indeed have something on earthquake prediction. Something repeatable.
But more importantly, you people better pay attention to where that quake and the others in northern Cal are happening. Remember the purple path?
That 5.6 hit [color=009999]in the path, and near the end of the zone. Not good at all. Look at the quake in relation to the zone line.
. . .
May be indicators that the zone is becoming unglued. They said it would start at one end. Well, we've got bigger quakes recently at BOTH ends. I don't know what else to say about it.
In a general sense, the haters can keep hating. The scientists, and pseudo scientists can keep denying me a fair shot with a reasonable set of tools, and laugh at me, mock me and dismiss me.
But I am one persistent son of a bitch. You will not keep me down.
Originally posted by westcoast
I expect to see more action down South very soon. Perhaps off-shore this time, or even off-shore Southern oregon.
Originally posted by Olivine
A little Mag 3.0 near the Mendocino Triple Junction (MTJ)
USGS event page
ETA: You're good, zworld. 25 miles west of Petrolia.
Shakemap from the 1:07 PM (PST) February 13 Mw 5.6 event near Eureka, CA. The maximum instrumental intensity for this earthquake is VI. The moment tensor solution, determined at Berkeley, indicates normal faulting, which could be due to bending in the subducted plate.
Originally posted by westcoast
Okay, so I see THIS as the possible REAL Southern end of the Cascadian subduction zone. Looking at that theory, these current quakes coincide with the Northern Cal and others. Granted, this is an active area, so it could simply be a coincidence...but I dunno. Keep an eye on this area too.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
The Japan 9.1 is not only a warning, but a hard lesson learned. Unknown, deeper, dormant fault extensions could indeed rear their ugly head, and add another order of magnitude to what is currently thought possible.