It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Any way, best wishes to you Annee and everyone else here.
Thank you for the wishes and back at you.
But you are getting way too off topic with your politics in this thread. So I'm not going to respond more then I already have on the politics.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Annee
No but you asked my age and what's the difference?
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Annee
Wow, were you referring to the man who taught fisting to teens or to a Communist subversive who supported gay men sodomizing little boys? No wonder this country is in trouble with morals like that. I have no sympathy for people who promote that insane stuff and think it should be promoted to grade school children and that is exactly why I make points like this on this forum.
I frankly don't care any more what you think. You challenged my credibility last night and made demands to know personal stuff about me, then you support people like Jennings and Hay.
I really have nothing further to say other than I'm not worried about your opinion of me.
Cultural assimilation is a socio-political response to demographic multi-ethnicity that supports or promotes the assimilation of ethnic minorities into the dominant culture. The term assimilation is often used with regard to immigrants and various ethnic groups who have settled in a new land. New customs and attitudes are acquired through contact and communication. The transfer of customs is not simply a one-way process. Each group of immigrants contributes some of its own cultural traits to its new society. Assimilation usually involves a gradual change and takes place in varying degrees; full assimilation occurs when new members of a society become indistinguishable from older members. en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Annee
No but you asked my age and what's the difference?
I felt manna was mature in age.
However - - It was mostly you I was talking to - - and I wanted to know if we were on the same level.
I don't really think you are in your 20s - - but you might be. I'd guess in your 40s.
As far as gay sex - - you think its all wrong - - so unless they're celibate - - you'd determine it is immoral - - no matter what they did.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
And there's that Christian bashing again.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
No Annie, what I find offensive is the agenda of indoctrinating the youth. Otherwise, as I already said, let them do as they will but not to the children.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
And there's that Christian bashing again.
I was raised Christian - - and I have every right to have an opinion about it.
"Right Wing Christians" and "some Christians" - - - not ALL Christians.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by TheRedneck
Oh, dear, and I thought I was done with this thread...
reply to post by Annee
I see much hate in that post Annee... do you hate the restaurant owner who denied her access?
I'm sorry if you interpreted it as hate - - - and that you think maybe its eaten away on me.
That is not the case. I was raised in a metaphysical environment (long before the New Age fad). All experiences are to learn from.
I am simply stating fact as experienced. Making my point that I am indeed focused on the Equal Rights aspect of this subject.
Humans often tend to be ignorant of what they don't know or have not experienced. The restaurant owner protected what was his. Same way the Marriage Rights people think they are protecting an ideology.
Don't think I don't understand the perspective from both sides -- because I do.
However - - forcing an ideology on those who don't want it - - - to deny Equal Rights is unacceptable.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
No Annie, what I find offensive is the agenda of indoctrinating the youth. Otherwise, as I already said, let them do as they will but not to the children.
Just like NOM and AFA use the children as their excuse.
Originally posted by Annee
We can't integrate schools - - we're doing it for the children.
We can't have purple Teletubbies - - we're doing it for the children.
We can't put rainbow sprinkles on cupcakes - - we're doing it for the children.
One Million Moms/One Million Dads project One of AFA's (American Family Assc) creations is One Million Moms and One Million Dads, two websites with the goal mobilizing parents to "stop the exploitation of children" by the media. It organizes boycotts and urges activists to send emails to mainstream companies employing advertising, selling products, or advertising on television shows they find offensive. The "One Million" in the titles of the projects appears to be a completely arbitrary number, as it is not based on any actual survey of group members, let alone how many members might be mothers or fathers. en.wikipedia.org...
Labeled a hate group Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), in a 2005 report, stated that the AFA, along with other groups, engaged in hate speech to "help drive the religious right's anti-gay crusade." Mark Potok of the SPLC determined that the turning point was 2003's Lawrence v. Texas, in which the Supreme Court struck down Texas's anti-sodomy laws. After that, the Christian right spent millions on advertisements, and on pastor briefings organized by activists such as born-again Christian David Lane. Lane helped AFA put constitutional opposite-sex marriage amendments on the ballots of 13 states. In November 2010, the SPLC changed their listing of AFA from a group that used hate speech to the more serious one of being designated a hate group. Potok said that the AFA's "propagation of known falsehoods and demonizing propaganda" was the basis for the change. The AFA was greatly displeased with the designation as a hate group, calling the list "slanderous". In response to the SPLC's announcement, some members of the Christian right "call[ed] on Congress to cut off their funding." J. Matt Barber of The Washington Times said that the SPLC was "marginalizing" themselves by giving the AFA the same hate group designation shared by the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis. en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by sweetliberty
reply to post by Annee
Government doesn't know how to wipe they're rears let along know what's best for our children.
Most parents are responsible and they teach tolerance. Bad things happen and no matter how some people try to spin their reasoning's for kicking parents in the teeth for being responsible parents.... this division and intrusion forced onto parents via ignorant sqeeky wheels and haters... will only create more division.
No one "group" is the ultimate victim.... well, except maybe the tug and pull we see onto the minds of our children, created by control freaks and the government.
It's my opinion that when people are forced to stand on their own two feet without other people or the government standing on top of them, then children and adults both get along much better.
This reminds me of the "nagging" wife who can't keep her nose out of the neighbors business. Many times this behavior results in infidelity or divorce.
To war against parents for having a difference of opinion is the true meaning of a control freak.