It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The federal Food and Drug Administration warns that raw, or unpasteurized, milk can contain harmful bacteria. Dairy farmers say demand is growing because of concerns about hormones in traditional dairy products.
The issue is that pasteurization changes the milk so that it is not as good for the body. www.realmilk.com...
Since when is milk good for the body anyhow? Are we all infants?
Get calcium. Milk turns you fat.
And besides, its full of radiation
You can keep your slimy radioactive lactations that do little more than fatten you up and give you tumors.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by GeorgiaGirl
The issue is that pasteurization changes the milk so that it is not as good for the body. www.realmilk.com...
You're citing an essay from 1938? Just be glad you don't live in France. The milk there is pasteurized by irradiating it!
It's a complex issue. People should read about it before passing judgment. Personally, I believe that our bodies are best able to function when provided with food that is unprocessed as possible.
This is typically how it works: Raw milk, organic vegetables, vitamins, herbs, or basically most things good for you are *accused* of making people sick on the front page, then 3 weeks later they print an article on page 5 stating that they made a mistake.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Since when is milk good for the body anyhow? Are we all infants?
Get calcium. Milk turns you fat.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Since when is milk good for the body anyhow? Are we all infants?
Get calcium. Milk turns you fat.
I assume then you don't eat cheese, ice cream or chocolate either and don't put cream in your coffee or whipped cream on your pie?