It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Carseller4
Parasites rarely, if ever, leave their host voluntarily.
Originally posted by Carseller4
If poor people where unhappy about their situation they would stop voting for Democrats.
But they have found their comfort zone and will continue to do so.
If they ever decide they want more out of life, it would be in their best interest to consider Republican candidates.
Parasites rarely, if ever, leave their host voluntarily.
Originally posted by Carseller4
If poor people where unhappy about their situation they would stop voting for Democrats.
Originally posted by intrepid
Carlin explained it years ago. Warning, there's one F bomb in with his wisdom:
Originally posted by kaylaluv
he doesn't really care about the middle class - he just wants to protect the wealthy. He just said that because the biggest percentage of voters are middle class, and he's trying to get their vote.
In other words, the top 1% share of income grew nearly five times faster than their share of taxes.
*snip*
But it does mean that when pundits and politicians talk about the rich paying “a big chunk,” they should be clear that it’s because the rich earn “an even bigger chunk.”
Originally posted by intrepid
reply to post by Drew99GT
Did you read all of the article that you quoted as stating this is "liberal propaganda"? Here, I'll help you out with that:
In other words, the top 1% share of income grew nearly five times faster than their share of taxes.
*snip*
But it does mean that when pundits and politicians talk about the rich paying “a big chunk,” they should be clear that it’s because the rich earn “an even bigger chunk.”
Originally posted by groingrinder
Originally posted by GeorgiaGirl
reply to post by Drew99GT
I agree with you completely, but in just a minute a million ATSers are going to come out of the woodwork and tell you that you are evil and/or mistaken, and also tell you how wrong you are.
But I think it's true...people who get the most government assistance often actually have higher standards of living than many people who get no assistance at all.
What about the poor who do not get government assistance or assistance from churches or shelters? Being poor does not automatically place you on assistance and cause goodies to rain down from heaven. I will bet that many poor were not counted in these surveys. Did they scour the deserts for homeless vets camped out? I seriously doubt it.
I do not get any assistance, but I do own two computers and use my fathers internet access to try and start my own business doing 3d modeling, uv mapping, texture painting and animation. I am also learning to do voice overs for animation projects.
I also paint houses and do light carpentry and demolition when I can find the work. Being as I live in Arizona and have to compete with illegal aliens for those jobs, I have to charge a fraction of what I should be making.
Nobody surveyed me. And I am willing to bet that many more poor folks were not surveyed as well.
Originally posted by Drew99GT
Originally posted by kaylaluv
he doesn't really care about the middle class - he just wants to protect the wealthy. He just said that because the biggest percentage of voters are middle class, and he's trying to get their vote.
I hate to break it to you, but that is EXACTLY what Obama has done as well! He's totally financed by Wall Street just like the Republicans are! Obamacare was nothing but a gift to the Insurance industry (an industry that owns more land than any other in the US). That;s why the stock of health insurance companies went up 10% after Obamacare was passed.
NO politician cares about you or me. Of course they all caer about the people who finance them. The crap they say in the campaign trail is nothing but a gimmick.