It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aelita
By the way I was wondering if a shield made out of mesh would help to guard against the MW radiation. I bet it would. And the antenna of that active denial would make a sizeable target for any kind of weapon Iraqi happened to have.
Originally posted by Mr No One
Exactly why should the US allow international law or the Geneva conventions to deter us from fighting an enemy that has NEVER respected either?
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by Mr No One
Exactly why should the US allow international law or the Geneva conventions to deter us from fighting an enemy that has NEVER respected either?
because the us agreed to do just that when it entered the GC, and in all the alterations/additions afterwards
Originally posted by mad scientist
The Geneva Convention only applies if both parties are signitories to it.
Besides, how ridiculous is the notion of having rules for war, look at what war is.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Prohibiting mass murder of civilians, forbiding chemical and biological agents, and prohibiting torture and public display of pows is a bad thing?
Originally posted by mad scientist
Well CBW comes under the CBW convention not the Geneva convention.
Originally posted by mad scientist
The Geneva Convention only applies if both parties are signitories to it.
Besides, how ridiculous is the notion of having rules for war, look at what war is.
Originally posted by devilwasp
no the geneva confention works if one side does it,just cause the other side didnt it doesnt give you an exscuse to break it.
General Provisions
Article 2
Art. 2. In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in peace-time, the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them.
The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance.
Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the present Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound by the Convention in relation to the said Power, if the latter accepts and applies the provisions thereof.
Originally posted by mad scientist
Erm, OK where's your link if your sure this is fact ? I'm fairly sure your wrong. It doesn't make much sense does it if one side has to abide by the rules and the other doesn't ?
Originally posted by devilwasp
did you read it?
"Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the present Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations."
meaning that the side that has joing cannot break the law.
Originally posted by Munro_DreadGod
To hell with treaties, when you are fighting an enemy who signs up to the treaty then adhere to it, if they are not signed up then use what u want. They will.
Originally posted by RATT
Originally posted by Munro_DreadGod
To hell with treaties, when you are fighting an enemy who signs up to the treaty then adhere to it, if they are not signed up then use what u want. They will.
Hell yes!!! Let this new tank show them who their messing with! America isn't going to sit back and let her self be hit once again! This new weapon reminds me of the weapon that the Aliens on "War of the Worlds" used against us.
Originally posted by mad scientist
Yes you idiot, it says the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations.
OK, I'll make this simple.
If their are 3 countries A,B,C
Countries A and B have signed and Country C has not.
SO they are all at war. Countries A and B have to abide by it with regards to each ( 'mutual relations') other but neither does with country C unless country C accepts the conditions of the GC.