Tracking the Elite on facebook

I Recently came across a blog which featured a few (uncomfirmed) elites personal facebook acccounts, i didn't take much notice at first thinking they were probably fake/clones.

Here's the blog. www.thetruthseeker.co.uk...

You may need a Facebook account to check the links. Notice how many Rothschilds and Rockerfellers they have on their freinds list.

Check this Van Hausen Guilders page and Freinds list, Rather odd. www.facebook.com...#

Guess who ? www.facebook.com...

Check this guys freinds list, an awfull lot of royal nobles, masons and rothschilds for Normal folk. Hey it's Prince Harry www.facebook.com...

There's something hilarious about these high-ups having Facebook accounts and appearing accessible to ordinary folk.

reply to post by Skyfloating


Probably because Facebook privacy is [SNIP] and hidden profiles can be found by checking through freinds lists. There's no Facebook Royal edition.

Mod Note: Do Not Evade the Automatic Censors – Please Review This Link.

I do not have a Facebook account so I guess I can't be a friend of Rothschild and co.
I guess I will have to live with that.

reply to post by Thetawave


The prince Harry link didn't work ):

Have you guys tried adding anyone? If so, did they accept?

Originally posted by Skyfloating
There's something hilarious about these high-ups having Facebook accounts and appearing accessible to ordinary folk.

Actually, the House of Windsor has been getting more and more common with each passing generation. Phil was a rake in his day, Charles' taste in philandering seems to veer towards (to be generous) the pedestrian and Harry wouldn't seem out of place making a guest appearance on "Jersey Shore". Meanwhile, Newt's trying to ape the Royals with the open marriage thing.

Seems to me the 'elites' are somewhat less elite than their publicists would have you believe

Fitz

reply to post by Thetawave


Is it him or a fake though? There are loads of fake accounts so maybe this is just another?

More to the point, the truly powerful would not be on Facebook as they have no need for it. Bloody stupid product anyway to be honest. I genuinely cannot believe how much they reckon it is worth should it float.

Originally posted by Thetawave
reply to post by Skyfloating

 

Probably because Facebook privacy is [snip] and hidden profiles can be found by checking through freinds lists. There's no Facebook Royal edition.

As more people start looking into it and seeing these accounts you better bet there will be a "Royal" or "Elite" edition or Facebook light (Free) vs. Facebook Elite membership only for a FEE

Originally posted by Thetawave
reply to post by Skyfloating

 

Probably because Facebook privacy is [snip] and hidden profiles can be found by checking through freinds lists. There's no Facebook Royal edition.

that was a funny statement (Royal Edition).

I think most of them are fake accounts possibly setup deliberately by intelligence community? just a thought.

reply to post by Thetawave


Hey what's wrong with having friends that are Masons??

Anyways.. rich people have facebook. GASP! The only difference between the rich and folks like us is money .. otherwise, they're just people.

reply to post by Rockpuck

Good point - I have known Masons - Though some were critical of certain aspects but enthusistic of other aspects.
It is true all are people yet people are many different things regarding they way they think

Just keep at it, anything that keeps you using facebook is good. The government wants you to use facebook, it works out because you can update your status and let your friends know what you are doing and where you are going. Sure saves a lot of time and manpower trying to track people without them knowing, with facebook you can track yourself.

Originally posted by JoshF
Just keep at it, anything that keeps you using facebook is good. The government wants you to use facebook, it works out because you can update your status and let your friends know what you are doing and where you are going. Sure saves a lot of time and manpower trying to track people without them knowing, with facebook you can track yourself.

True - But I believe any activity online is monitored. Every key stroke email etc.
Super computers take out key words and phrases and compartmentalise them.
Perhaps not having an account on Farcebook put you into a certain category.
I do not have an account of Facebook because if I want to communicate with real friends I do by other means.

reply to post by artistpoet


I know a lot of rich people, I have some very rich people in my family, sadly I'm not rich (yet ) and they are all very, very, very normal. You get the occasional sociopath who's bat!@$ crazy and all are a little detached from the sufferings of everyday people (especially the "born into it" group). But when your sitting down talking, drinking a beer, unless you knew the person was filthy rich you'd never know it off hand. The number of extremely wealthy people that are self absorbed sociopathic aholes that would throw you under the bus (literally) for a few extra bucks is very, very small.

Originally posted by Rockpuck
You get the occasional sociopath who's bat!@$ crazy and all are a little detached...

I prefer to use the term 'Socially Misunderstood' when refering to networkdude.

reply to post by Rockpuck


Yes I would tend to agree with you - Whilst exhibiting paintings in Belgravia I came into contact with a few very rich folk - I actually enjoyed their company they were very fair minded and relaxed.

reply to post by AugustusMasonicus


he was talking about rich folk.

I am quite far from that status.

Right now, I aspire to move up to 'POOR" status.

reply to post by network dude


I am an arse out of my trousers poor artist - I chose this life to persue my passion. Sometimes rewards can not be measured in money terms and I never envy any who are rich in fact many I meet admire my freedom.

reply to post by artistpoet


well if happiness was wealth, I would be rich, but since they don't take happiness at the grocery store, I will have to measure my wealth in $.