It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In one episode, Colbert enlists his lawyer, Trevor Potter, to create a tax-exempt 501(c)(4) so that he can obtain secret donations in a "completely transparent" way.
"Can I take this (c)(4) money and donate it to my super PAC?" Colbert asked after signing paperwork that registered the shell corporation in Delaware. "You can," Potter said.
The camera then cuts to Colbert, whose face displayed a look of total shock. "Wait," Colbert said. "What is the difference between that and money laundering?"
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by nixie_nox
I've said it before, and stand by it NOW:
If EITHER Jon or Stephen were to actually run, EITHER would get my vote...hands down.
No question.
The system is so broken it barely functions!!
I joined and donated to the Colber SuperPAC when it first started.......
And I might very well do so again...now that our household has an income....after nine months without.
I want one of those tee-shirts that says, 'turtle's don't like...' ------------
see ya, gonna go order one NOW!
Go stephen! Go jon!!!!
Originally posted by sbc650mike
Their exposure of the super pacs is what news should be. Very informative. The bit making fun of Newt unofficially giving directions to his super pac was hilarious. Why is it that 2 comedians are more informative than CNN/FOX/ MSNBC combined?
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by capone1
I think they are both trying really hard to get people to understand what the PACs are doing.