It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by partycrasher
ahhh those clandestine groups...provides an "out" so to speak....
That would be highly unlikely. Where I come from it would be a Masonic offense for a member of a regular lodge to "hold Masonic communication" with a clandestine lodge or its members. Basically, a Mason caught doing so would be booted out.
actually i am aware of clandestine locations and meetings often these are populated by "official" freemasons who are performing appendent or otherwise functions.
Ay chance the clandestine's feel that they are the "real steel"????
Oh, plenty of chance of it being more devious. Just look at P2 in Italy... mob-run. But that's why you can't judge Masonry as a whole, or Masonry as an institution—because there is no one thing that is Masonry.
Any chance they are performing rituals of a more ancient or perhaps more devious nature???
actually i am aware of clandestine locations and meetings often these are populated by "official" freemasons who are performing appendent or otherwise functions.
Quite a few. I've had a number of new members to my lodge who had been conned into joining a clandestine lodge and didn't know better until later. They resigned their membership in their old lodge and joined ours.
Originally posted by partycrasher
How many people think they are "real" masons because they belong to these clandestine groups and as such within that group provide this info as fact???
Why would it be the responsibility of regular Masonry to police irregular Masonry? If I don't like the KKK, I don't join the KKK. If I don't like racists, I don't hang out with racists. If I hear that someone killed someone else, and I can prove it, I call the cops. Not my Grand Master.
How would a "real" mason know if these "other" masons do exercise racism, satanism or anything that one or the other would consider to be non masonic???
Not really.
Do you see my point?
What do you expect US to do as real Masons, that you, yourself, couldn't do as an individual?
I do not wish to be arrogant but will the real masons please stand up.............and they all stand and point fingers at the others and say nay?
I do not think so.
So the lodge becomes a meeting place for people to covertly discuss meeting later elsewhere to carry on other secretive activities which may not be accepted or understood.
You're a Past Master, right? I guess you've earned the right to snore during a meeting…
Originally posted by getreadyalready
I'll admit the meetings are all of those things, but since the whole idea of Masonry is to improve one's self, and inner reflection is a big part of that, what better place is there for inner reflection than in a long-winded, boring meeting! Think of it like the perfect time for a little prayer and a little meditation, in a quiet place, among trusted peers, and with the added benefit of some allegory and parable to get you jumpstarted on your journey.
But, as GRA said, that doesn't make their side-group any more Masonic. I could just as easily meet likeminded people while serving jury duty, or riding the bus, or in my kid's PTA.
Originally posted by partycrasher
I think that clandestine meetings occur because people want to ACTUALLY get something done (usually something bad) instead of relying on useless, longwinded, impotent meetings and rituals. These would be the ones who would take it upon themselves, a whole new set of rules, oaths and obligations so the other masons did not find out.
Yeah, a lot of us go out drinking after lodge. But that's after lodge. Some go to a cigar bar. Real world domination plots probably happen in such smoke-filled rooms. I've got bad lungs, so I guess I'll never know. But again, it really doesn't matter how they met, if they're doing there bad deeds off-grounds, right?
Say I was a practitioner secretively of the yezidic faith and I joined a masonic lodge because I was told by a mason confidentialy that other yezidi were in attendence and that is how they initially met.
So the lodge becomes a meeting place for people to covertly discuss meeting later elsewhere to carry on other secretive activities which may not be accepted or understood.
I think to be more specific, Masonry as an institution does not endorse in any way the worship of Lucifer.
Originally posted by partycrasher
i am going to get off of ats for awhile and let others if they wish to interject.
i got what i wanted out of this and i see why masons say "we dont worship lucifer" for example.
they may not worship lucifer but perhaps some masons do and the non luciferic ones either do not know or again in denial and this is just an example.
Is the reason why we hear so much from nobody, know nothing masons is because the Ancient Order Masons are the "real" masons?
Is it not true that ancient order masons do not recognize the fm masons as being real masons?
Is it also true that ao masons will not "grip" a prince hall mason because they do not recognize them either?
how is this different than racism since ph masonry has been mostly african american?