Baraq Obama literally translates as Satan?

Sorry, I'm at work and can't really watch a video, but I don't need to. I can video myself saying the sky is yellow, provide some some tenuous links to it and post it, and there will be people using that YouTube video as "concrete proof" that the sky is yellow. I've been following and posting on this site long enough to know that a YouTube video doesn't prove a thing. BTW, are there any updates on the "new" date of rapture yet? I mean if Obama is the antiChrist there surely must be some kind of timeline as to where we are in regards to the "prophecies" of Revelations.

Originally posted by sparda4355


So Silly. Has this thread been moved to HOAX yet?

Why should it be moved to hoax, because you personally aren't open to accepting it as a potential possibility... So others shouldn't be granted the right to make that choice?

I hope you live in a country that doesn't grant you the freedom of speech, because frankly... It's not something I believe you deserve!


No I think it should be moved to Hoax because it has been proven to be a hoax.

www.snopes.com...

Even if we assume your first video is correct, it doesn't translate literally to "lightning falling from the heights/heavens". It simply translates to "lightning from the heights/heavens". Missing the word "falling" is pretty important there (fallen angel?). I believe angels who aren't fallen could be referred to as lightning, or bright light from the heavens. So by that logic, Barack is just an angel from the heavens, not a fallen one.

reply to post by sparda4355


I think you forgot that his last name is allegedly fake. So apparently, he's a "false" Antichrist.

How's that for irony?

Originally posted by DarkKnight76
It must be getting bad, if it's not even summer, and people are already pulling out this tripe. No, he is not the antichrist, nor is he the messiah. Just as Ron Paul is neither, or Romney or Gingrich, and I don't even like RP Romney or Gingrich.

Do you have a youtube video to back those statements up?

Interesting video, but only time will tell.

reply to post by DarkKnight76


But I never said it was proof... Nor did the guy in the video.

I'm just saying by itself it's weird and interesting. I posted it because it's interesting, not because it's definitive proof!!! Read what I've been saying all along.

Old news. It's been well known for a few years now, at least by everybody in the GOP, that Obama is a gay socialist Muslim commie fascist who hangs around with terrorists, goes around apologizing for America and spends the rest of his time in the Whitehouse smoking dope and listening to Anti-America Rap music.

reply to post by kaylaluv


It is not proven as a hoax... It's simply flawed by matter of opinion. Regardless it's an interesting theory. I never claimed it to be fact, but you take another persons attempt to discredit it as fact.

They are all opinions and we are all entitled to them.

That said I take back my comment about you not deserving free speech. I didn't mean it and apologize.

I thought you were saying I didn't have a right to a differing opinion than yours.

reply to post by MeesterB


Thank you. That's all I intended. To share something interesting.

reply to post by kaylaluv


Btw... You do realize lucifer is the arch angel of light right? So the video holds validity with or without the word fallen or falling

Originally posted by sparda4355
reply to post by kaylaluv

 

Btw... You do realize lucifer is the arch angel of light right? So the video holds validity with or without the word fallen or falling

So all angel are satanic? So Jesus was saying he sees all angels as Satan?

reply to post by sparda4355

I would say you didn't search very hard for existing threads.
First Result

reply to post by kaylaluv


What? No? That's not what I said. I'm saying your link doesn't technically disprove my link, just shows an alternative opinion about it. Had I known of your link originally I would have posted both of them as I have no particular set belief on this particular subject aside from the simple fact, I find it interesting. And I think it's ignorant to difinitivily state it's undeniably true or untrue.

I don't believe that fairies truly exist (I hope I didn't just kill a fairy, my kids would be upset with me) but I would not dismiss the idea that they could potentially exist and I just haven't seen one!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't believe Obama is the Antichrist, honestly I think it's too easy, just like the pope!

But... I wouldn't boldly state it's not either of them because... Basically

I don't f ing know!!!!!!!!!

Aside from the fact that Baraq (it's Barack BTW) Obama does not literally translates as Satan. Who would name their child Satan in any language?

I get the jest of the OP though....I've been getting it for 3+ years.

Originally posted by jlssg4
reply to post by sparda4355

 

I would say you didn't search very hard for existing threads.
First Result

Originally posted by Muttley2012
Aside from the fact that Baraq (it's Barack BTW) Obama does not literally translates as Satan. Who would name their child Satan in any language?

I get the jest of the OP though....I've been getting it for 3+ years.

...you didn't watch the video, did you?

I'll just say that instead of trying to debunk theories with your innate knowledge, you should actually watch the video. Maybe...you might actually agree with OP.

Here's an example. Baraq (which is Hebrew) has a different spelling in English. That's just obvious.

I think you know where to find the video if you want to watch it instead of jumping straight to the posts. Good day.

Originally posted by jlssg4
reply to post by sparda4355

 

I would say you didn't search very hard for existing threads.
First Result

reply to post by Starchild23


Thank you very much starchily I do appreciate that. It's not even about right or wrong, just an interesting video with a potentially pretty serios message if by chance it is correct.

I like people like you.

Thank you again

Originally posted by sparda4355
reply to post by kaylaluv

 

Btw... You do realize lucifer is the arch angel of light right? So the video holds validity with or without the word fallen or falling

*facepalm*.....since when does 'light' become 'lightening'?!?! Not only that but the word 'lucifer' has nothing at all to do with Satan. That's just a common misconception based on a very old misinterpretation. newprotestants.com... www.theosophy-nw.org... www.israelofgod.org...

BTW...you don't seem very interested in 'truth'...but more so in 'opinion'.....even if that opinion is very obviously false, and thoroughly discredited as I showed in a link I provided in another reply here which you called "wordy" and only an "opinion".....even though it clearly showed that translating Barack's name into meaning 'Lightening from Heaven' was not just 'opinion' but was simply a wrong translation of the words. I'm wondering if perhaps you didn't read it in it's entirety because it was too 'wordy'

Originally posted by Muttley2012
Who would name their child Satan in any language?

Um... I don't know? Perhaps somebody who worships him?

You do realize people worship Satan right? Or is this something I'm going to have to probe to the relentless swarms of ats proof police?????

reply to post by bhornbuckle75


Actually I did read it and as I stated, it is a valid counter argument, id have posted it myself had I known it to exist prior to my post so that people could form their own opinions.

However, you are wrong... Just because you say it's fact doesn't make it so.

Your link is no more a fact on this subject than mine.

Dude, on this subject... There are no facts!!!

I can't even prove God exists or that there will be an antichrist. But I believe there will be one. And I think both my video and your link are interesting and have valid points.

I've done a lot if bible studies using Greek and aromatic translations to try to get to the root of a biblical scripture.

90% of the time when translating you have to make an educated guess, lots of words hold many meanings and lack direct translation.

So I agree with the author of my video that if those words were used to translate, it would in fact be his name.

But I agree with your link that alternative words could ave been used. (summing it up)

What I don't agree with is your authors and your personal arrogance that your opinion is fact and mine is stupid... They are both opinions and hold an equil amount of validity!!!