It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For decades archaeologists have argued about the origins of the mysterious “Harappan” (Indus Valley) civilisation that flourished across what is now Pakistan and northwest India from about 3000 BC. Now, new findings by Indian scientists working in the Gulf of Cambay suggest that the Harappans were descended from an advanced mother culture that flourished at the end of the last Ice Age that was then submerged by rising sea levels before ‘history’ began.
Now, new findings by Indian scientists working in the Gulf of Cambay suggest that the Harappans were descended from an advanced mother culture that flourished at the end of the last Ice Age that was then submerged by rising sea levels before ‘history’ began.
Originally posted by mab22
nice find,
i remember reading about pyramids in bermuda,
check the link below
bermuda pyramids
not a very credible source though
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by Arken
Another AMAZING find Arken I feel there is much hidden data about the past of humans and possible others hidden under new sea floor from past Earth cycles in relation to crust movements and water relocation. It makes you wonder why the bottom of the oceans floors haven't been mapped fully. But then when you consider a potential space related navy it makes sense they would exist for any incoming space objects have a larger chance of entering the oceans instead of land impact and some water related security should be there to analyze. SnF
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13
In all honesty, it isn't as simple as just mapping the Oceans. After 5000 plus years (minimum) of sea currents running over any ruins, sediment burying anything and changing sea levels creating differing tidal forces on possible locations, the chances of any significant city type sites being located is very small and the cost to search is eye wateringly high. The chances are that any finds would be crushed fragments, not easy to find under tonnes of sediment at the bottom of the sea.
I suspect that future finds off shore will be linked to significant discoveries made on land - things that will give clues as to where to search. Until then, the oceans are too big and expensive to properly scour.
Originally posted by Arken
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
reply to post by Arken
Another AMAZING find Arken I feel there is much hidden data about the past of humans and possible others hidden under new sea floor from past Earth cycles in relation to crust movements and water relocation. It makes you wonder why the bottom of the oceans floors haven't been mapped fully. But then when you consider a potential space related navy it makes sense they would exist for any incoming space objects have a larger chance of entering the oceans instead of land impact and some water related security should be there to analyze. SnF
Absolutely, my friend.
The Oceans hide our unknown past like Space...
March 16, 1987|By JAY HAMBURG, The Orlando Sentinel
ORLANDO -- Alfred Conway keeps remembering the days he used to hunt treasure with Mel Fisher, who is rich as a pirate king since finding the gold-laden Atocha off Key West.
Conway, a Vero Beach treasure hunter, has yet to uncover a bounty rich as his friend`s. But he claims to have found an underwater pyramid off Indian River County.
Originally posted by Phage
Interesting image but the images produced by side scan sonar can be deceptive. A steeply raised object should produce a "shadow". The "pyramid" shows no shadow.
It should also be noted that the sonar data has undergone quite a lot of processing and the image is built up from a mosaic of many passes of the vessel. As can be seen in better resolution, the "pyramid" seems to be the stitching lines between several mosiac parts.
coastalmap.marine.usgs.gov...
The "pyramid" is about 6 miles across at its base and lies in waters more than 5,000 feet deep. That undersea terrain was never uncovered.
edit on 1/31/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Phage
Interesting image but the images produced by side scan sonar can be deceptive. A steeply raised object should produce a "shadow". The "pyramid" shows no shadow.
It should also be noted that the sonar data has undergone quite a lot of processing and the image is built up from a mosaic of many passes of the vessel. As can be seen in better resolution, the "pyramid" seems to be the stitching lines between several mosiac parts.
coastalmap.marine.usgs.gov...
The "pyramid" is about 6 miles across at its base and lies in waters more than 5,000 feet deep. That undersea terrain was never uncovered.
edit on 1/31/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)