It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rainbowbear
To say it is trivial is to say, we will buy into any future that seems better than what we had. Nevermind that possibly there was a much more civil (dare I say religious) way to live than now.
I believe it is due to a disconnection with our past.
It is an appeal to authoritiy to take historical "facts" as truth. Like we need experts to tell us that people have ALWAYS used boats, and ALWAYS used trade.
Its about being the gatekeepers to truth, where the ultimate power is held.
Originally posted by rainbowbear
Are you asking me "who" as a way to seek knowledge? or to prove something? I fail to see the point. From your angle, there is much ado about nothing.
Damn, H. At least I have questions!
You know who. Dont be a fool.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by rainbowbear
Are you asking me "who" as a way to seek knowledge? or to prove something? I fail to see the point. From your angle, there is much ado about nothing.
Because I usually get:
1. Reptiles
2. Da Joos
3. Illuminati
4. "Elites'
5. TPTB
6. Banksters
7. The Devil and his friends
8. Annunaki
9. ....other....
Originally posted by swoopaloop
reply to post by kdog1982
The article says that the walls were twenty feet in height. Those two types of walls aren't the same.
About two dozen shell mounds have been found in South Carolina. Another two dozen rings are in Georgia, and a handful of others have been located in Florida and Mississippi. The Fig Island complex features one ring with the largest open interior plaza (slightly more than an acre), another ring with the smallest plaza (about the area of a basketball court) and the largest mound by volume of any of the known shell enclosures. The oyster shells brought to Fig Island to build the mounds would fill 12 Olympic-size swimming pools. Russo and Rebecca Saunders mappedmounds ranging from 5 to 20 feet high and, using carbon dating, they found shells from 3,800 to 4,200 years old. Some experts speculate that the mounds formed as refuse piles when natives built temporary homes along the coast. Others see them as ceremonial structures for special occasions, not everyday living. Russo leans toward the latter, pointing to the large shell pieces found throughout many rings. If the mounds had served as daily refuse piles, they would have been built slowly and shells would have been broken more often. But if they were built during large ceremonial gatherings, shells would have been piled on quickly, causing less breakage.
Originally posted by calnorak
So they claim to come from sun people?
Also the natives never claim to come over the land bridge, they say the ant people helped them, whatever they are.
Originally posted by rainbowbear
reply to post by jennybee35
i agree with you about the irony of it all.
The reason why it is SO important seek truth about our past, is so that we can know our future.
This is the same reason history is always being corrupted.
To say it is trivial is to say, we will buy into any future that seems better than what we had. Nevermind that possibly there was a much more civil (dare I say religious) way to live than now. Id say we seem pretty savage these days. There will always be the carrot of Utopia on the stick of ignorance to lead the people this way and that.....its happening today.
I believe it is due to a disconnection with our past.
It is an appeal to authoritiy to take historical "facts" as truth. Like we need experts to tell us that people have ALWAYS used boats, and ALWAYS used trade. It is Holmbergs Mistake, that the entire Enviornmental Movement is based on, and so it is based on myth. The decisions that shape our future are rooted in the past. It is your duty as a critical thinker to challenge that.
Its about being the gatekeepers to truth, where the ultimate power is held.
I guess we shall see.
Originally posted by rainbowbear
reply to post by AuranVector
I have only just begun to dig into the modern authority of the Book of the Hopi Epoch--Frank Waters....he is how most of us know the stories....
Anyone ever look into Waters? I know he was nominated for a few Nobels and was under some Rockefeller grants at one time...
Good topic for new thread.edit on 31-1-2012 by rainbowbear because: oops
Originally posted by rainbowbear
They are also happen to be TPTB out of default, and they are hiding proof and knowledge of humanities greatest source of power in the artifacts and control of dissemination of info(history).
Yes, it seems you still have a lot of trust in the way things appear to be outwardly, so please dont expect another response from me. like I said--you seem to already know!
Originally posted by MrCipher
Yet another piece of evidence illustrating that we still have a lot to learn about our own past. Nice find