It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by rstregooski
My thoughts are that if this was a different candidate people talking about they are starting to like him because he threw out some one-liner zingers, instead of liking him for his policies, that Ron Paul supporters would be calling these people idiots.
For example...South Carolina....Newt won South Carolina from one liners and zingers in the debates. Ron Paul supporters called all of South Carolina morons, sheep, and brainwashed fools.
But apparently, if Ron Paul uses the same debate strategy to try to win voters based off of personality rather than policy...you guys are all for it.edit on 30-1-2012 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by wardk28
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
I tell you what. Since you support Obama, how about compare records between Obama and Paul. Let's see who is more consistent. I remember Obama making a whole lot of promises and not keeping very many.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by wardk28
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
I tell you what. Since you support Obama, how about compare records between Obama and Paul. Let's see who is more consistent. I remember Obama making a whole lot of promises and not keeping very many.
I don't base my vote on consistency...I base it on policies.
The KKK has been pretty darn consistent over the years...doesn't mean you should admire them because of that.
And for the record...Obama has kept or partially kept 42% of his promises. And he is currently working on 34% of the others. He did break or was blocked on 23% of his promises. I'll take that record anyday. I'm under no delusions that any politician can get everything they want to get done.
Originally posted by Jassu
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Partially kept? Seriously? So if you partially lie, does that mean its not a real lie? So who cares about consistency right? He can just keep changing policies. Your logic amuses me
Originally posted by pheonix358
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by wardk28
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
I tell you what. Since you support Obama, how about compare records between Obama and Paul. Let's see who is more consistent. I remember Obama making a whole lot of promises and not keeping very many.
I don't base my vote on consistency...I base it on policies.
The KKK has been pretty darn consistent over the years...doesn't mean you should admire them because of that.
And for the record...Obama has kept or partially kept 42% of his promises. And he is currently working on 34% of the others. He did break or was blocked on 23% of his promises. I'll take that record anyday. I'm under no delusions that any politician can get everything they want to get done.
The KKK and Obama have a lot in common. Both don't give a toss for your rights. Both want things done their way. Both are willing to kill and maim. You have hit the nail on the head.
One other thing, please quote the source for those stats. Let me guess, um.... The White House!
P)
Originally posted by rstregooski
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Are you willing to say that you actually don't believe that the #1 problematic issue in this day in age is the government "waste" debt crisis??edit on 30-1-2012 by rstregooski because: beer