At a certain distance from Earth in space no living being can not survive ,even in a spaceship.

um nice conclusion? have been to the moon , but not as early as ppl think.. thats why there been leaked tapes and vids of the moon right?

Originally posted by cainey
reply to post by canadiansenior70

 

If everyone thought like that we'd never advance as a civilization. It's like saying "If man were meant to fly he'd have wings" Well you know what? We don't, but that didn't stop us did it?

Do you really think that we'll stop going further into space because of cosmic radiation? No we'll find a way to protect ourselves against it and head out there. That's what the human race does if we hit a wall we'll either find away around it or knock it down.

....but Man does not fly..... on his own. It's the airplane/or.. that flies and in a pressurized cabin is where man sits to stay alive, as the airplane transports him.

What is invented for the future is already here and not used, or not yet invented.

reply to post by diamondsmith

They who?Laika was send into space very close to Earth.

Reason poor dog died was simple - the envirnomental system failed causing temperature to rise over
100 F. Dog died from heat stroke

Nor some mythical limit.....

First of all... The moon is accepted as being a former piece of the earth that was knocked abroad by a collision with a larger asteroid or another planet in early formation. Therefore my point bein that if we were to die from being outside a certain range from the earth, might we be able to survive near the moon? Or atleast In the space between the earth And moon? I didn't read all the responses but I'm sure somebody else has mentioned this! It would make for an intereating book or movie though.

I removed the post was just being a jerk my bad
sorry

reply to post by diamondsmith


Really? Seriously? So all the Mars lander photo's, all the Mercury, the NASA Stereo project, all these missions that are beyond the Moons distance have ALLL been fabricated?
You really believe that?

reply to post by primus2012


That would make me a unbelievably happy man.

reply to post by r3axion


Mr Wheaton suggests you do your own thinking! He certainly didn't sound very knowledgable.

By this point I have no doubt told you more than you really wanted to know about the Van Allen belt and the Apollo radiation problem! Nevertheless, I have barely scratched the surface, and waved my hands a bit, to make it seem likely that I'm not full of baloney. But in the end you always have to either do it all yourself, or trust a stranger completely, or try to find some path in between: which means understanding a little science, so you can judge for yourself if my arguments make any sense at all, check a little, think about it, maybe do a bit of research on your own from the references if you are interested. The only alternative is to trust no one and do everything, which is simply impossible for anyone; or really give up all your judgements to other people, who may be saints or crooks, wise or insane. I hope you will try to find the possible but not perfect in-between path by learning some science. It is hard, but it is fun and interesting, and it gives you your own power to think and evaluate for yourself, albeit in a limited and imperfect way.

Click here for more information.

With the correct "ingredients", or shall I say with the correct supplies and information, you can travel in space. You would have to design the ship properly, with the correct amount of materials, and materials on standby for an average human biological organism.

I think as a human being we have some type of electromagnetic energy that's connected with the energy/vibration of our planet and I don't think we would be able to "exist" outside of Earth's frequency.

i was kind of skimming through the thread, the title intrigued me haha. i wasn't sure if he meant we all could or could not live in space after a certain distance.

anyways, sorry to burst your bubble OP but this awesome thing called LRO took some good images late last year of our moon landing.

LRO apollo sites

hope this helps out

[snip]

It would be far too hard to place all the landing site footprints, and stuff left over from the landings... the radiation belts will not kill you to go past them... nor will you explode, or anything like that. If you had the balls to say that to one of the astronauts that reached the surface, they would knock your lights out. These people were very proud of what they did, and you would realize that you cannot fake the kind of pride they have of their accomplishments.
[snip]

reply to post by blarged

I lived out of my country for almost a year and wanted to keep going to even more hostile territories. Here's the real kicker: I came back healthier than before! Care to explain that?

Yes, you were in your element like a fish in the sea, and the probability of you facing any real danger was minimal. And drowning in that sea unbeknownst to you, was about as likely as a fish drowning in the ocean. Congratulations on coming back healthier then before, seems like you needed a vacation.

But you have missed my point. I will not bother to rephrase it.

What if someone used a planet as a "space ship?" What about then?

reply to post by diamondsmith


Diamondsmith,

I think that we went to the moon. Multiple times and we actually have facts to prove it. Now, your reason for saying that we didn't go is because you claim that we can't go further than a certain distance. Finally, as you stated on page 2, you know this because of...

space projection?????

My question.

What the heck is space projection? And please, try to explain with more than just a few words.

Thank you.

humans are stuck in the bubble like a fish in a tank or a fly you put in a balloon and blow it up, trapped in your little cell. Connected to the thing of earth for which you are bound to the forces of gravity there in which bind your fabric cell structures together and keep you alive. Gravity,gravity. Control that and all of humanity will be free of their earthly bind. Pretty good aye. A theory.

Originally posted by r3axion

Originally posted by canadiansenior70
"The likelihood of one individual being right increases in direct proportion to the intensity to which others are trying to prove him wrong." - - Harry Segall *

So you're saying the most likely thing that happened is the launch that millions of people watched on TV, was fake..

Yes, just as anything else on TV can be faked, even 9-11.

As opposed to you failing to give credit to human ingenuity and accepting the fact of our scientific development and achievements....

Human ingenuity might one day solve the problem, but in the meantime you are one of the many trying to prove the OP wrong!

That makes a lot of sense, really.

Thank you

CS70
The space program, as well as other programs, (are) is just another way to spend money on black ops.

r3axion
That's an opinion with no factual basis.

My original post specifies it was JMHO, Just My Honest Opinion. You have your opinions and I have mine, but with $2.3 trillion missing from the Wallet of the Pentagon, one has to wonder which Black Op benefited from that amount.

That's not even a good comparison. Humans inhabit every climate on Earth.

And not all humans are the same, just as not all animals are the same. Could a blind and deaf human in a wheelchair live alone in the thick of an Amazon jungle? No. Each human has various needs to survive certain types of weather, terrain, etc., just as animals.

Again
JMHO

OP is soo right. And to just add to his theory, watch all the videos relating to the fake moon landing and how much fake 'science' NASA and the goverment try to throw at us to explain their unknowns.

China was caught faking a mission to space, so why fake it if it was possible? NASA was caught photoshopping images of the solar system. What credibility do they have left now? Zero in my opinion.

And this video should explain some things also.