It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"First of all, I don't put people on food stamps," Obama said. "People become eligible for food stamps. Second of all, the initial expansion of food-stamp eligibility happened under my Republican predecessor, not under me. No. 3, when you have a disastrous economic crash that results in 8 million people losing their jobs, more people are going to need more support from government."
One major change in food stamp rules — in the direction of more generosity — occurred with the 2009 “stimulus” law, which has President Obama’s signature, not Bush’s.
Another major change in food stamp rules — in the direction of more generosity — occurred with the 2008 Farm Bill. We all know that Bush was president in 2008. But what Obama hopes you do not know is that Bush never signed it. Here’s wikipedia’s narrative:
On May 15, the House and Senate passed the bill, but President Bush issued a veto on May 21. The House voted to overturn the president’s veto shortly thereafter, and with the margins by which the bill was passed, a Senate override also occurred; so the Congress overrode the president’s veto, passing the bill into law (Public Law 110-234, the Food and Energy Security Act of 2007). However, the veto override was moot, as a 34-page section of the bill was omitted in the version sent to the White House. In effect, the President vetoed a bill Congress never considered. The bill had to be re-passed by Congress.
The House passed the Farm Bill again on May 22, and the Senate shortly thereafter. President Bush again vetoed the measure, but this veto was overridden in both Houses on June 18, so the Farm Bill in its entirety became law.
In summary, Bush vetoed that law twice.
Meanwhile, Obama was a U.S. Senator in 2008. Senator Obama had THREE chances to vote against it, but he never did (he abstained all three times).....
Originally posted by AQuestion
reply to post by xuenchen
Der xuenchen,
I am confused, I don't trust any politicians, there are not enough jobs, how many should starve? I can feed some and I do, we run a food pantry for the poor. I can only feed so many, how many should starve in a nation with an abundance of food? During the depression ranchers felt that they did not get enough for their milk so they poured it down the storm drains while people starved. The current choice is not between working or not, it is between having others help you or starve. I pay for many to not starve. How can anyone buy a Mercedes and let people starve, I sold mine, it was a 230 slk and sweet. Peace.
It's the blaming and lying that are the problem. Congress does very very little for the majority of citizens.
This year, more than 46 million (15% of all Americans) will get food stamps. … That’s 45% higher than when Obama took office, and twice as high as the average for the previous 40 years.
According to the Census Bureau 49% now live in homes where at least one person gets a federal benefit — Social Security, workers comp, unemployment, subsidized housing, and the like. … That’s up from 44% the year before Obama took office, and way up from 1983, when fewer than a third were government beneficiaries.
Originally posted by xuenchen
This year, more than 46 million (15% of all Americans) will get food stamps. … That’s 45% higher than when Obama took office, and twice as high as the average for the previous 40 years.
Welfare, food stamp rolls soar under Obama
According to the Census Bureau 49% now live in homes where at least one person gets a federal benefit — Social Security, workers comp, unemployment, subsidized housing, and the like. … That’s up from 44% the year before Obama took office, and way up from 1983, when fewer than a third were government beneficiaries.
Congress had the chance to fix these problems in 2009/2010 (111th Congress).
The committees were all under Dem control.
The majority suffered record losses from the legislation.
The politicians have let the corporations ship the jobs overseas.
There may not be a way out of this.
edit on Jan-28-2012 by xuenchen because:
Originally posted by jtma508
It stuns me that people make an issue of the number of people on foodstamps during the current administration. What did you people THINK was going to happen? We had historic job losses running up to January 2009 and then a huge increase in the length of time people remained unemployed. The vast majority of those people were clearly going to need assistance meeting their basic needs. People don't understand this or is this just another specious political argument?
job losses
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
You appear to be having a reading comprehension issue.
Obama said he doesn't put people on food stamps, they just become elgible. FACT.
Obama said the INITIAL expansion was under Bush. FACT.
Obama never said he hasn't also expanded the food stamp program. FACT.
Words mean things...but you have to have some comprehension to understand what they mean when combined together.edit on 28-1-2012 by OutKast Searcher because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
You appear to be having a reading comprehension issue.
Obama said he doesn't put people on food stamps, they just become elgible. FACT.
Obama said the INITIAL expansion was under Bush. FACT.
Obama never said he hasn't also expanded the food stamp program. FACT.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Bush added 14.7 million people to the food stamp program over 8 years.
Obama has added over 15 million people in just 3 years!
Obama has added more Americans to the food stamp program than any other president
in the history of the United States. Obama is a disgrace.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Americans prefer independence.
Originally posted by Cuervo
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Bush added 14.7 million people to the food stamp program over 8 years.
Obama has added over 15 million people in just 3 years!
Obama has added more Americans to the food stamp program than any other president
in the history of the United States. Obama is a disgrace.
What part of "poverty" do you not understand? People are on food stamps because there is a recession, not because some president filled out an application for them. This is all a direct effect of the recession, the housing collapse, and the tripling of the deficit in the last ten years.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Americans prefer independence.
Yes, many impoverished single-parent families and out of work households prefer independence over food. I mean, shallow pride is way more important than feeding your toddler, am I right?
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
And if you really want to look for a root cause - 30 years of trickle-down economics and free trade agreements that wiped out manufacturing in the US. No jobs = more poverty.
Originally posted by jimmyx
reply to post by xuenchen
hey...have you people been locked up in a box for the last 4 years?....you are upset because people recieved food stamps?....please, all of you, go live in another country where all the people are rich, and the poor just die in the streets....maybe you'll be happy there.