It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Torsion Physics
The Macro-physical Dynamics of Gravity & Fractal Infinity
Originally posted by 46ACE
"to the debunkers: understand it is irrefutable"
"bull***"...classic wordy techno psuedoscience bunk.
not wasting any more time here ...
Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by Spiratio
System of Truth
Marko Rodin, Nassim Haramein, Tesla, Stubblefield, Keely, Dale Pond, Walter Russell... The list continues.
Originally posted by metalshredmetal
reply to post by Spiratio
awesome F-ing information. there's a lot of truth in what you're saying, and it makes sense on different levels.
first of all, i must warn you that this thread may become the target of shills and trolls. the TRUTHS of torsion physics is too valuable a truth to be thrown around the public sector, according to some. look up the threads on ATS about Marko Rodin's work, you'll see it in full force.
if you haven't researched the work of Marko Rodin yet, I highly suggest you do. here's a short video describing his work, of which the circle of 1-9 is most fascinating: TED talk about Marko Rodin. Also, in summer 2011 there was a very good documentary published, called THRIVE, which explains the existence of toroids EVERYWHERE and of torus dynamics. Nassim Haramein also has interesting ideas about toroids.
anyway,
I really like your ideas about particle-entrainment of sun-particles coming to earth, and how sun-particles mimic the toroidal fields of the sun itself...this is quantum entanglement.
i haven't done the research yet but i will, does this information mean that Earth has an odd number of torsion fields or an even number?
finally, i'd like to point out that this "layered torsion fields" theory completely supports the existence of multiple "planes" of reality. or even more so as you describe (and more accurately) different layered densities of realities. This is the foundation of reality as described in the Law Of One/Ra Material...each "sphere of influence" (Earth, human, anything) consists of 8 different densities (8 being a full octave of vibration). Each density is home to it's own vibrational spectrum of "reality". I think these different densities would translate into the different torsion fields of a Planet that you describe. it would be beautifully fitting.
are these your original ideas? what is the inspiration for this material? Star & Flag
Originally posted by tgidkp
I will not ask you for evidence. quite a lot of "science" these days is a house of cards.
rather I ask this: what does it DO?!
quite frankly, if you cannot produce some kind of effect (do something) with this, then all you have accomplished here is a cheap bit of mental masturbation.
so. please. propose some realistic application that you might imagine for this.
what does it do? I'm listening ....
Originally posted by tgidkp
I will not ask you for evidence. quite a lot of "science" these days is a house of cards.
rather I ask this: what does it DO?!
quite frankly, if you cannot produce some kind of effect (do something) with this, then all you have accomplished here is a cheap bit of mental masturbation.
so. please. propose some realistic application that you might imagine for this.
what does it do? I'm listening ....
Originally posted by tgidkp
otherwise, its just self-important glorification.
Originally posted by abecedarian
So what about Uranus? How does that work, considering it's axis of rotation is inclined nearly perpindicular to its orbital plane?
edit on 1/27/2012 by abecedarian because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by tgidkp
reply to post by Spiratio
if YOU didn't need it, what makes you think that others do? are other people not also capable of receiving revelations? or are YOU the great revealer?
I never said that what you are working on is not important. to the contrary, I can align your findings directly with my own in certain respects.
however, an idea is only as good as it is useful....otherwise its just a neat-o gee-whiz idea. we have lots of those already and they become less dazzling by the day.
if you want people to listen (me included) you should do more SHOW and less TELL.
you should give it some thought.....what does it do?