Judge Has [not] Ruled, Obama [not] Off Of Ballot In Georgia! (erroneous news report)

reply to post by Benevolent Heretic


What you dont get and actually refuse to even try to understand is if a person born in this country is a citizen of both China and the USA they ARE NOT ELIGABLE TO BE THE LEADER OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Obama at birth was a citizen of Kenya AND the United States. HE IS NOT NOR WILL HE EVER BE ELIGIABLE

reply to post by GeorgiaGirl


HAHAHAHA...WELL SAID, GEORGIA GIRL!....

**ATTENTION**

The political trolling, rude remarks and off topics posts will cease to exist right about now.

Further disruptions of this thread will result in a potential loss of posting privileges.

Thank You.

~Tenth
ATS Moderator

reply to post by candcantiques


I would love to move the fight to where it truly belongs. Sadly most people these days do not realize where that energy should be spent. Could you imagine the Chaos if just 20% of Americans refused to file taxes? The IRS would overflow and a flat tax system would have to be implemented.

Imagine a world in which G.E. Whirlpool, and all those other zero tax paying corporations would have to start paying when they buy goods.

People want to fight lets start with no more write-offs and a sales tax based on goods purchased. That tax would be collected at the register and relieve all Americans of the burden of a 5000 page tax code.

Put the fight where it belongs, not on something you can't change. Obama has been in office three years, that ain't gonna change no matter what is proved. All I see are a bunch of irrational haters going after the wrong thing. Wake up and realize the birthers are being played. Call it simply distracted if you need to but either way you are getting upset about something you cannot do anything about. All you can do is block the next election. It is more about hating Obama than fixing the Country for the Birthers.

My girlfriends family (I can't stand them) are birthers, they are also racists, although they do not realize they are........

Originally posted by candcantiques
reply to post by SkyMuerte

 

Obviously someone that knows NOTHING of the law as it is written in the Constitution. A presidential candidate MUST have two (2) parents that are CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT THE TIME OF THE CHILDS BIRTH in order to be eligible for the office of the President of the United States. Obamas father was a Kenyan citizen. Never was an American citizen. Obamas kids are eligible. Obama is not. why is this an issue? HEY LETS ELECT A PRESIDENT THAT IS A CITIZEN OF ANOTHER COUNTRY. See the problem yet? As a citizen of another country you cannot have control of the United States military. He never was eligible. NEVER.

Actually, this constitutional requirement you speak of only applies if the candidate was NOT born on American soil. So, if someone was born in France, to be a U.S. presidential candidate, he/she must have 2 parents who are citizens of the United States at the time of the child's birth. Even then, it's ok if 1 parent only was a U.S. citizen, if that parent resided in U.S. for at least 10 years, at least 5 years of which must be after the age of 16. Look it up.

This is all moot, because Obama was born in Hawaii. He provided a state-issued birth certificate on his website in 2008. For those who say it's not a real birth certificate - prove it beyond the shadow of the doubt.

Originally posted by kawika
reply to post by Shadowalker

 

Not so fast.

Where is the judges ruling?

The linkback to the WND article says nothing about a judges ruling.

I pasted the quote in this post for you

Short thread,

how did you miss that? Marked with lots of stars and all that...

Read down, all the way down. They are adding to the top.

edit on 26-1-2012 by kawika because: add quote

edit on 26-1-2012 by kawika because: corectolated spel'n err

edit on 26-1-2012 by kawika because: corectolated spel'n err

Yes i saw that but its only what he said before the trial. The trial happened and evidence was recorded for the first time. It can now be referenced by multiple cases and multiple places.

But there is no ruling yet.



And that MyFOX hunk of crap link was written in advance. Its worthless after this morning.

reply to post by Shadowalker


It was written this morning but revised after the trial. look at the top.

Updated: Thursday, 26 Jan 2012, 1:27 PM EST
Published : Thursday, 26 Jan 2012, 7:26 AM EST

Originally posted by SkyMuerte

My girlfriends family (I can't stand them) are birthers, they are also racists, although they do not realize they are........

Lol, your intent is pretty obvious right there. Just cause Obama is black (kinda), all this "law" stuff and upholding the Constitution is just a clever ruse to cover up the real reason that whites just dont like blacks in office, eh?

Does it MATTER if Obama is on the ballot in Georgia?
He won't carry Georgia - he didn't carry Georgia.
Atlanta is the only area that would vote for him with any strength.

Georgia is blood red and has been for a few years now.

reply to post by hadriana


The principle is what matters in this case, and the precedent it COULD set if it comes to pass.

The journey of a 1000 miles begins with the first step, no matter how small that step seems.

This whole issue really does need to get national attention, not for the sake of ousting Obama because he's considered a poor president, but because the Constitution needs an amendment that clearly defines the term "natural-born citizen." It is interpreted any which way fits a particular agenda at the moment, and though there are precedents set, the lack of a clear definition keeps the door open for all sorts of politically motivated suits and hearings.

I think it would take maybe 6 months of debate in Congress to establish a clear, fair definition of the term, then another couple weeks or months for ratification. With the way things are now though, it seems there are some in this country who don't want a clear definition, so that they may either sidestep the laws or create artificial attacks against their political opponents.

reply to post by kaylaluv


WRONG!!! Dead wrong! Please go back and read and research. NBC, natural born citizen, includes the nationality of the either parent.

Originally posted by CaticusMaximus
reply to post by hadriana

 

The principle is what matters in this case, and the precedent it COULD set if it comes to pass.

The journey of a 1000 miles begins with the first step, no matter how small that step seems.

Oh well SURE if you are looking at it from a legal standpoint.
I meant from a practical standpoint for Obama - he didn't really have anything to lose by losing Georgia b/c it wasn't his. Which is not to say that his supporters won't be pretty hot, I've not doubt. But he wouldn't have carried Georgia anyway, so what does he care to show up? That's all I meant.

If this had been a state like California or New York - then it would have mattered to him enough to show up and expose himself.

interesting news

1. obama could still technically win if other states vote (fraud) for him.

2. if he is not eligible for the ballot, how is he president?

if your boss finds out you lied on your resume, he doesnt recommend you not get a promotion, he fires you!

Remember what nasty pelosi a democrat said about impeachment of bush, it would tear apart the country. So looks like our dictator in chief will have to illegally hold office for "the good of the country" this is why Im an anarchist.

I dont trust that myfox link at all.

I saw where they edited at 1:27 EST and i had a tab open and they went right back in when I checked the link update and changed the tense of several words AFTER I was just referred back.

People are making it up and then adjusting the facts already.

I am curious, from an editorial standpoint/ATS posting guidelines, what happens to this thread? The title and info in the opening post are factually incorrect (seems the poster did not know this, but still.) There has been no ruling. Obama is still on the ballot. Multiple sources now confirm this.


Mods?

Originally posted by kozmo
reply to post by kaylaluv

 

WRONG!!! Dead wrong! Please go back and read and research. NBC, natural born citizen, includes the nationality of the either parent.

Watched the case this morning live.

I believe you are very incorrect. That was the primary thing the judge was interested in, and they provided all of the correct law relating to it.

Here is another article about this trial.

"It states that "Georgia Administrative Hearings Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi gave no indication when he will rule or whether he will sanction President Obama and his attorneys, all of whom refused to attend the hearing."

Link to article

Also, there is no mention of Obama not being allowed to run in any other media.

reply to post by Rren


I sure wish at least some people would go to the link that I provided and read the TITLE of the article that states

JUDGE WILL ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST OBAMA...

It's not really hard to go to the link I provided and actually read the entire article.

reply to post by Shadowalker


No reason to doubt that Judge will keep his word.

Judge has character...