It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Sheesh, that's one big non sequitur. Why do we need to calculate ANYTHING regarding black holes to reach not deep space but near-Earth orbit and objects?
Originally posted by buddhasystemWhat a stupid thing to say.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
reply to post by anon72
I think it's kind of funny that Gingrich would like to put up a permanent, multi billion dollar facility on the moon, in less than 8 years..
You think somebody in the audience was all like:
" Should somebody tell him we never went back to the moon?! "
More campaign rhetoric, there's no way to pay for this space program, and he'd end up susidizing the private space industry, and we all know how that works outwell for us in the end.
Florida is a big space state and all the other candidates, other than Ron Paul will probably say what ammounts to the same kind of plan that this guy has.
~Tenth
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by anon72
a moon base and Colony would cost trillions if not billions of tax payers money.
If we cannot even solve some of the theoretical problems of physics regarding celestial bodies in outer space, how do we ever plan to deal with the multitudes of problems when it comes to space travel and living in space?
Permanent moon base? That's funny. The fittest and strongest astronauts can barely crawl when they get home after a year aboard the ISS due to the physiological and bone degeneration that occurs when you are not in a 1G habitat.
Originally posted by Diablos
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Sheesh, that's one big non sequitur. Why do we need to calculate ANYTHING regarding black holes to reach not deep space but near-Earth orbit and objects?
If we cannot even solve some of the theoretical problems of physics regarding celestial bodies in outer space, how do we ever plan to deal with the multitudes of problems when it comes to space travel and living in space?
Permanent moon base? That's funny. The fittest and strongest astronauts can barely crawl when they get home after a year aboard the ISS due to the physiological and bone degeneration that occurs when you are not in a 1G habitat.
Originally posted by desert
reply to post by Eurisko2012
Eurisko, I admire your enthusiasm.
Yes, the ISS, that they, they being governments, built. Maybe if the ISS had looked more like the "2001" wheel, I would warm to the idea of a moon base by 2020...even 2015. BTW I should be retired by then, so would you kindly accept my application for my fantasy job as a lunar bartender, mixing drinks and wise counsel at Moon Base Alpha 1 ?
During all my years on Earth, the one characteristic shared by politicians was their love of hearing themselves talk. I don't doubt Newt's high intellectual capacity. His patriotism led him to public service (and discovering wives as past astronomers discovered planets), but I find his mind curiously similar to those gigantic clouds of gas that spawn suns and planets, most of which are devoid of life. Most of his ideas are devoid of reality, but he does love to put them forth.
IMO Newt would do himself and us a favor if he worked on a science fiction novel about his ideas for the Moon. Imagine Newtlandia, the 51st state!
Oh, anybody remember the billboards in space idea? (Not Newt's BTW)
Eurisko, keep on trucking! Oh, and I think you need a lunar webcam at MBA1, so I can see the goings on and be there vicariously.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Diablos
If we cannot even solve some of the theoretical problems of physics regarding celestial bodies in outer space, how do we ever plan to deal with the multitudes of problems when it comes to space travel and living in space?
Why would we need to solve theoretical celestial problems for human spaceflight? These two areas are unrelated, and space flight is mostly practical engineering.
Permanent moon base? That's funny. The fittest and strongest astronauts can barely crawl when they get home after a year aboard the ISS due to the physiological and bone degeneration that occurs when you are not in a 1G habitat.
Not funny at all. Individual astronauts could spend 6 months or less on the Moon, the same as on the ISS. They would also be better off than ISS astonauts because of weak lunar gravity.edit on 5/2/12 by Maslo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
I think the toilets will work better with the weak gravity.
Swimming in a Marriott Hotel swimming pool with 1/6th gravity will take awhile to get used to.
We will probably need some of that Area 51 technology to make in more feasible for the tourists to enjoy themselves.