It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by Xygoat
Private sector companies will provide tourism and lunar colonies on the moon.
That translates into GDP growth.
Originally posted by Maslo
So he means private companies (SpaceX, Bigelow, ULA etc.), but payed for by public money. That is indeed plausible (even tough I doubt the 2020 date in current financial situation, as that would surely require increased space budgets). I do think that as a space enthusiast, Newt knows what he is talking about in this area, regardless of his other opinions.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
His gambit with "private" whereas he's trying to avoid saying "public" is laughable.
He knows it's a non-starter, the United States can't bankroll a huge program like that one any time soon.
But in any case, I strongly believe he doesn't care. This was a PR moment with no foundation in reality or common sense. I do despise this sleazeball.
Writer: PORTER, COLE
Performed by Frank Sinatra
Fly me to the moon
Let me play among the stars
Let me see what spring is like
On a, Jupiter and Mars
In other words, hold my hand
In other words, baby, kiss me
Fill my heart with song
And let me sing for ever more
You are all I long for
All I worship and adore
In other words, please be true
In other words, I love you
Fill my heart with song
Let me sing for ever more
You are all I long for
All I worship and adore
In other words, please be true
In other words, in other words
I love you.
Originally posted by St Udio
the Federal Reserve is bailing out the EU right now to the tune of $10Trillion (over & beyond the ~$800Billion rescues already spent)
He knows it's a non-starter, the United States can't bankroll a huge program like that one any time soon.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by buddhasystem
He knows it's a non-starter, the United States can't bankroll a huge program like that one any time soon.
The US certainly can afford it. We are talking about maybe 10 billion a year channeled to spaceflight, its peanuts in bigger picture. The opposition is purely political, and thats where president with such agenda could change things.
Originally posted by Mahree
It sounded to me as though he was looking for a "competitive space program based on prize money incentive." This could be investors from the private sector.
Originally posted by autowrench
reply to post by anon72
I was watching him say that, and this thought came to me. Why would he say a thing like that, if he did not think it could actually happen? After all, Newt is pulling out all the stops to appear to be telling the truth, and is spending money like mad hiding his past and fooling the people. Why would he say that if he did not think it possible? The only thing that answers this is: The Lunar Base is already there, already build with your tax dollars. Make sense?
Could America even afford a Moon Mission right now?
And the number you quote is highly unrealistic. The Shuttle program cost nearly $200B over its 30 year duration. Just operation cost for the shuttle was $5B annual in 2005. Think about it. Lunar station is an enterprise that is a few orders of magnitude more complex and costly.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Mahree
It sounded to me as though he was looking for a "competitive space program based on prize money incentive." This could be investors from the private sector.
a+b = "Newt is talking nonsense, beware this guy"
Originally posted by Mahree
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Mahree
It sounded to me as though he was looking for a "competitive space program based on prize money incentive." This could be investors from the private sector.
a+b = "Newt is talking nonsense, beware this guy"
OK...I get it.
No sense in even "trying" to do something to bring back our country to the proud and beautiful place it used to be and can be even better now that we have learned so much more.
That is a goal, to have a colony on the moon, doesn't anyone believe that working toward that goal is better than just giving up before we start?
When you house roof is leaking, it's ill advised to spend you last dollar on caviar.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Mahree
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Mahree
It sounded to me as though he was looking for a "competitive space program based on prize money incentive." This could be investors from the private sector.
a+b = "Newt is talking nonsense, beware this guy"
OK...I get it.
I don't think you do.
When you house roof is leaking, it's ill advised to spend you last dollar on caviar. There are tremendous problems in this society that can't be fixed by simply launching a few daring people to a celestial body. It will make you will better momentarily (and so will a spoon of caviar and a glass of champagne) but it would be a waste of money in the long run.
I see the continuing increase on income gap and refusal of the politicians and society at large to tackle health care costs (which are completely out of control and are destroying America's competitive advantage) as having more potential to further America's decline than our inability or lack of will to settle the Moon.
I totally agree with you that space travel has a lot of technical, economic and spiritual value for the US. But the system is broken now. It won't perform the task.