What is CIRFU? You may not want to know.....

reply to post by conspiracytheoristIAM


You are a brave soul for even posting here then. However, they can't arrest everyone can they?

reply to post by awake1234


Aw, shucks, it's just a few publicly available whois records. Nothing special at all, really.

I am, however, mildly surprised that they are using the same infrastructure that we do. Ergo, the same vunerabilities that we have, they do.

Why We Post Our IP Address

We post our IPv4 address (also referred to as a "dotted quad" or IP address) as a sort of insurance policy. Recent events have proven that a government agency or a malicious hacker can fairly easily seize or hijack a domain name. This has already happened to at least 75 U.S. web sites without due process of law. Their DNS records were changed, essentially erasing them from the "phone books of the Internet." Also see this article: U.S. Government Shuts Down 84,000 Websites, ‘By Mistake’ To insure against this, we are distributing our IPv4 address.

Aint that clever.. Little play on letters.. CIRFNU = (C) see (I) me (R) really (F) F (U) YOU. Bstards. Those clever pos'

reply to post by Druid42


Does sound like a fancy way of censoring. Little by little in increments we are losing our rights and freedom under the guise of cyber crimes or advertising strategery unfortunately it seems like even here there are still people asleep at the wheel. Many of you are good people that was great research you did and this on the heels of what google is doing .

reply to post by ltinycdancerg


ALL of what you describe already HAS and IS being implemented in New Zealand

Guess we are the guinea pigs here for the NWO!

Well, this certainly explains some of Go Daddy's support of the whole SOPA thing,

Not only are they supporting it, they are actually making money from this; due to the redirects.

One Representative pointed out some of this hypocrisy while trying to get other exemptions put in place...

from creepingjesus.tumblr.com... :

Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO), the only member of Congress present at the hearing with any tech experience, having founded several web companies, introduced two amendments: one to exclude universities and non-profits from being subject do having to shut down their own domain servers if accused of piracy under SOPA, and the other to exempt dynamic IP addresses, such as those found on web-enabled printers. Both were voted down.

Polis pointed directly at the real hypocrisy of the whole thing...
,

Polis pointed out that SOPA and Smith’s amendment already excluded certain operators of sub-domains, such as GoDaddy.com, from being subject to shutdowns under SOPA.

“If companies like GoDaddy.com are exempt, why aren’t non-commercial domain servers exempt?” Polis asked.

Go Daddy is getting rich by screwing up the internet for everyone else. If this keeps up the entire internet will be controlled by a select few companies...at least in the United States.

its TPTB slow gathering of ducks..lining them up and ready for when they decide to 'drop the boot'.

how deep DOES the rabbit hole go....TPTB have to come up with a way to censor the internet...look at how much info you have gained from this open source, both good and stupid..world wide news at your finger tips....knowledge that other people, hundreds and thousands of miles from you have similar thoughts or not...

i remember the time when there was no internet and i'm surprised that it hasn't been overtly censored sooner.....2012.................

reply to post by Druid42

I am not really seeing the problem. There are more than one registrant and any site can have multiple addresses pointed at it from more than one registrant.

The Internet is digital, there will always be another way around it.

Just for fun, and perhaps to be a bit terrified...

Here's a reverse IP lookup of all the domains hosted at that IP.

[url=http://www.yougetsignal.com/tools/web-sites-on-web-server/?remoteAddress=cirfu.net]>>linky

reply to post by Druid42


Really interesting thread. S&F. Nice digging. I have always known that the freedoms that we find on line would not last forever.

You guys keep posting so I can keep learning.

I'll bet I know what the FU at the end stands for, if it's like any of the other rules and regs..

reply to post by Basilisk


Copyright infringement is in place to stop other people reproducing your work for monetary gain or without the creator's approval, be it music, songs or the written word.

Copyright infringement is a crime but file sharing is NOT. If I share files on my pc with others how is that copyright infringement? I can lend a cd I own to someone else so if I rip that to my hard drive and share it with someone else for their personal use, it is hardly theft since I purchased the cd.

I am also free to lend my own books to people I know without fear of copyright infringement.
I think this new bill has little to do with cyber infringement and crime and everything to do with control.

reply to post by Druid42


Interesting! You dont say! I for one am shocked!

Originally posted by MollyStewart
reply to post by Basilisk

 

Copyright infringement is in place to stop other people reproducing your work for monetary gain or without the creator's approval, be it music, songs or the written word.

Copyright infringement is a crime but file sharing is NOT. If I share files on my pc with others how is that copyright infringement? I can lend a cd I own to someone else so if I rip that to my hard drive and share it with someone else for their personal use, it is hardly theft since I purchased the cd.

I am also free to lend my own books to people I know without fear of copyright infringement.
I think this new bill has little to do with cyber infringement and crime and everything to do with control.

Seriously, I've said this before too. You can't police file sharing. Its the digital age, and that means If I want to set up a networking site for people to share their files, it is no different than having a social networking site where people exchange emails. No matter what, these laws are going to get circumvented. Drug war, meet piracy war.

They are determined to control the net. Too much free information at your fingertips and we all know that is dangerous. The serfs might start thinking for themselves, or worse, find out all the shenanigans TPTB are up to. Can't have THAT.

Originally posted by 1loserel2
reply to post by Druid42

 

Little by little in increments we are losing our rights and freedom under the guise of cyber crimes

Thank Anonymous for that. Doing such a service for humanity and all. /cough

Just more of the same freedom that big brother likes to delve on its fief class. Nothing much else to say.
Thanks for the info

reply to post by juveous


Seriously these cats think they are going to police file sharing...ROFL...It is nearly impossible especially if you do infrared transfers via P2P..The only way you can do that is if you ban home computers, and be forced to use the internet in a supervised LAN cafe...If that ever happens mass riots...

GoDaddy and a few others are probably owned by the government too.

It's a barrel of snakes. Wonder if MU even knew.