It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mrgregbusybee
reply to post by rogerstigers
How am I wrong on his foreign policy. He's stated it time and time again.....and I've read his views and his policies. I have reduced it down to simple foreign policy. Provide me another point or his policy on foreign policy that contradicts what I've written please.
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
Originally posted by mrgregbusybee
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
reply to post by mrgregbusybee
Ron Paul believes that we, as a country, deserved...listen to me DESERVED the 9/11 attacks.
Complete nonsense!
I'm not even going to waste my time reading the rest of your OP.
with all due respect, maybe you should read into Mr. Ron Paul. You might just be one of the people I mentioned above that found one thing you like about Paul and now you're on his bandwagon. May I suggest you read this article or you can find many others I'm sure....but it specifically states that he feels that America takes responsibility in those attacks. Sorry buddy.
www.mediaite.com...
Sorry buddy, but he never said he believes that we, as a country, deserved...listen to me DESERVED the 9/11 attacks.
Keep in mind that Paul Wolfowitz basically said the same thing "Bases in Arabia Motivated al Qaeda".
Originally posted by mrgregbusybee
reply to post by Common Good
I don't disagree with you about Newt. I'm not an avid supporter. Read what I wrote.... the man is smart but and he won't put up with the bullsh*t from foreign countries. He's not who I would want as my first choice, but he's better than allowing a NO foreign policy candidate in the white house
Sorry Paul lovers, I just can't take seeing all this liberal and socialist Ron Paul support from within our country. I believe people hear one thing and one thing only and then they decide that is the candidate they will pick without thoroughly researching that candidate. Paul's foreign policy can not be in office.
Originally posted by mrgregbusybee
... May I suggest you read this article or you can find many others I'm sure....but it specifically states that he feels that America takes responsibility in those attacks. Sorry buddy.
Originally posted by mrgregbusybee
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
Originally posted by mrgregbusybee
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
reply to post by mrgregbusybee
Ron Paul believes that we, as a country, deserved...listen to me DESERVED the 9/11 attacks.
Complete nonsense!
I'm not even going to waste my time reading the rest of your OP.
with all due respect, maybe you should read into Mr. Ron Paul. You might just be one of the people I mentioned above that found one thing you like about Paul and now you're on his bandwagon. May I suggest you read this article or you can find many others I'm sure....but it specifically states that he feels that America takes responsibility in those attacks. Sorry buddy.
www.mediaite.com...
Sorry buddy, but he never said he believes that we, as a country, deserved...listen to me DESERVED the 9/11 attacks.
Keep in mind that Paul Wolfowitz basically said the same thing "Bases in Arabia Motivated al Qaeda".
so you're taking what he said and making it fit your needs and wants?
Originally posted by mrgregbusybee
reply to post by rogerstigers
How am I wrong on his foreign policy. He's stated it time and time again.....and I've read his views and his policies. I have reduced it down to simple foreign policy. Provide me another point or his policy on foreign policy that contradicts what I've written please.
A PRO-AMERICA FOREIGN POLICY
As an Air Force veteran, Ron Paul believes national defense is the single most important responsibility the Constitution entrusts to the federal government.
In Congress, Ron Paul voted to authorize military force to hunt down Osama bin Laden and authored legislation to specifically target terrorist leaders and bring them to justice.
Today, however, hundreds of thousands of our fighting men and women have been stretched thin all across the globe in over 135 countries – often without a clear mission, any sense of what defines victory, or the knowledge of when they’ll be permanently reunited with their families.
Acting as the world’s policeman and nation-building weakens our country, puts our troops in harm’s way, and sends precious resources to other nations in the midst of an historic economic crisis.
Taxpayers are forced to spend billions of dollars each year to protect the borders of other countries, while Washington refuses to deal with our own border security needs.
Congress has been rendered virtually irrelevant in foreign policy decisions and regularly cedes authority to an executive branch that refuses to be held accountable for its actions.
Far from defeating the enemy, our current policies provide incentive for more to take up arms against us.
That’s why, as Commander-in-Chief, Dr. Paul will lead the fight to:
* Make securing our borders the top national security priority.
* Avoid long and expensive land wars that bankrupt our country by using constitutional means to capture or kill terrorist leaders who helped attack the U.S. and continue to plot further attacks.
* Guarantee our intelligence community’s efforts are directed toward legitimate threats and not spying on innocent Americans through unconstitutional power grabs like the Patriot Act.
* End the nation-building that is draining troop morale, increasing our debt, and sacrificing lives with no end in sight.
* Follow the Constitution by asking Congress to declare war before one is waged.
* Only send our military into conflict with a clear mission and all the tools they need to complete the job – and then bring them home.
* Ensure our veterans receive the care, benefits, and honors they have earned when they return.
* Revitalize the military for the 21st century by eliminating waste in a trillion-dollar military budget.
* Prevent the TSA from forcing Americans to either be groped or ogled just to travel on an airplane and ultimately abolish the unconstitutional agency.
* Stop taking money from the middle class and the poor to give to rich dictators through foreign aid.
As President, Ron Paul’s national defense policy will ensure that the greatest nation in human history is strong, secure, and respected.
Originally posted by rogerstigers
Originally posted by mrgregbusybee
reply to post by rogerstigers
How am I wrong on his foreign policy. He's stated it time and time again.....and I've read his views and his policies. I have reduced it down to simple foreign policy. Provide me another point or his policy on foreign policy that contradicts what I've written please.
You quoted him correctly enough.. you interpreted him 100% incorrectly. You might notice I did NOT say your post was 100% wrong.
If it helps you to understand (if you even really give a damn), read my OP here and see if it helps with understanding his foreign policy.
Originally posted by Glargod
Originally posted by mrgregbusybee
... May I suggest you read this article or you can find many others I'm sure....but it specifically states that he feels that America takes responsibility in those attacks. Sorry buddy.
Seriously? "Buddy", the Illuminati controlled CBS and puppet Bob Schieffer is the best source you can find? No wonder you're out to lunch.
Originally posted by Deja`Vu
reply to post by mrgregbusybeeHe is the only hope left for this country. I don't agree with you at all.
Originally posted by type0civ
reply to post by mrgregbusybee
Sorry Paul lovers, I just can't take seeing all this liberal and socialist Ron Paul support from within our country. I believe people hear one thing and one thing only and then they decide that is the candidate they will pick without thoroughly researching that candidate. Paul's foreign policy can not be in office.
That makes no sense...also his foreign policy is to respect the sovereignty of other nations...nothing wrong with that at all..if anything try it..just once.
Let's get some facts absolutely straight, the people that are riding and hoping for Ron Paul are anti-war, pro-drugs, anti-gay marriage.
Are there any true Americans left in our socially dysfunctional and economically crippled country we call the United States of America??
I think they're called Ron Paul supporters.
Are there any true Americans left in our socially dysfunctional and economically crippled country we call the United States of America??
Awesome generalization. I'm actually pro-gay marriage.
Let's get some facts absolutely straight, the people that are riding and hoping for Ron Paul are anti-war, pro-drugs, anti-gay marriage.
Really? He said that? A quote of him saying that would be great. Also, have you ever heard of blowback?
Ron Paul believes that we, as a country, deserved...listen to me DESERVED the 9/11 attacks.
Yes I'm sure that would happen Nostradamus.
We would be out of South Korea which will allow North Korea to overtake by force, South Korea.
Good for Iran! I say let 'em have as many nuclear weapons as they want. We have them, so do plenty of other countries. Let Iran decide what to do for themselves, not America.
Within the 1st year of office, Ron Paul would mind his own business and allow Iran to continue building or complete production of nuclear weapons.
That's actually a misquote.
Paul would allow Israel to fend for themselves and we all know that Iran wants nothing more than to wipe Israel off the face of the planet.
You forgot to start that sentence out with "In my opinion, based upon speculation, "
So in under 12 months, we would at a minimum see a war in Korea and one in Israel.
I don't know, Martial Law might be right around the corner.
How long do you think it will be before we have trouble knocking on our front door or better still, how long before you're in your front yard one day and see a rocket trail over head that is headed for a big city somewhere near you??
Cutting militarism is not the same thing as cutting defense.
By that point our military will be so reduced and weak, we won't be able to protect our own coast lines.
Yeah following the Constitution is BAD FOR AMERICA everyone.
Ron Paul is absolutely the worst candidate you can put in the white house
That is, if you're a war mongering maniac.
Opinions are like A$$holes, I know...but Ron Paul's stance on foreign policy alone should make you question his ability as a leader and make you strongly against him.....
Again, defense is not militarism.
that's if you care to protect your own country.
Perfect! Let's all support a non-existant candidate who is a figment of your imagination!
Some of you may say, well who the hell do you want as a president? My answer is simple, I really would like a president like Jesse Ventura not Jesse but with his attitude. At least we knew he was straight forward and not covering up anything. So my perfect president would have the attitude of Ventura, the thought processes of Ronald Reagan, the ability to communicate with foreign leaders like Bill Clinton and the ability to speak (speak only) like Obama....the man can talk. That's my perfect president
Don't forget a banker puppet as well.
Mitt Romney - I believe that he's a liar and he doesn't speak to the people, he speaks whatever somebody has told him. I'm voting for a president, not an assistant that tells him to make decisions.
"War with Iran!", that guy's a dumbass.
Newt Gingrich - The absolute smartest man in the campaign.
"Clean house"? That guy is a member of the CFR, he's clearly corrupt. He made over a million dollars advising one of the major companies associated with the economic collapse. This is a man who said marijuana possession deserves the death penalty. That guy is not who you want to be running this country.
There's no doubt he would turn our country around and no doubt that he would clean house in washington dc.
Let me give you some ways. Wars would continue to bankrupt this country as thousands of soldiers and who knows how many innocent civilians are killed. The Constitution wouled continue to get trampled on with things like the TSA and NDAA and Patriot Act.
I don't think he would be bad for our country in any way.
Are you typing this from an insane asylum?
Rick Santorium - Out of all the candidates, I think Rick would make the best all-around president.
What, like more wars, more unconstitutional legislation in the name of protecting us from the Al-CIAda boogeyman? Continuing the unwinnable drug war? Not talking about the fed? Read this.
He's able to talk to the people and understands what our country needs to get jump started.