It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by samkent
It seem to me that only a few people on conspiracy websites don't understand the collapse.
Why is it that these a&e 1500 don't come forward with calculations to show that the planes could not have caused the collapse?
Some one could place the plans in your lap and you could not show, with calculations, the buildings should still be standing because you do not have the structural background.
These 1500 claim they do have the background. And still they don't come forward with court worthy proof.
Claims from the a&e1500 and claims from the keyboard warriors do nor equal proof.
What are calculations worth it the correct data cannot be plugged into them?
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by psikeyhackr
Then how do these 1500 know where the mythical charges were placed?
What are calculations worth it the correct data cannot be plugged into them?
Since all the floors were supported at either the outside walls or at the core the only places you could place the charges were these two spots.
"Gee Sally all of a sudden we have these lumps in between all of our windows!"
"Yea they weren't there yesterday. The girls down stairs say they have them too."
And no one mentioned anything after the collapse.
Originally posted by Kester
reply to post by aboutface
Hurricane Erin has to be acknowledged. All the hurricane sites list it and it's behaviour seems odd even to the uninformed. Once it is acknowledged the choice is to say it may have been involved in some way or to say this is ANOTHER of those 9/11 coincidences like the 2.3 trillion dollars etc. etc. etc.
Hurricane Erin everybody. If you don't already know look it up.
Originally posted by Pilot
reply to post by pteridine
The really odd thing about Erin was that it was not reported on to any significant degree in the media....they usually milk a hurricane to death for ratings, the days leading up to 9/11 no mention of it. Questionable behavior.
Originally posted by Kester
reply to post by KillShotMi
Reported as such. We couldn't be sure without being in there ourselves. Not a lot of room for all of us.
The dust is a considerable proportion of the buildings. The proportion of the buildings travelling upwards is notable.
Thomas Cahill is a source of information regarding the dust.
Can't get the link to work but googling Thomas Cahill WTC will get plenty of information.
The really odd thing about Erin was that it was not reported on to any significant degree in the media....they usually milk a hurricane to death for ratings, the days leading up to 9/11 no mention of it. Questionable behavior.
Originally posted by aboutface
Something that no one has commented on is the hurricane that lay offshore on 9/11 near New York City, Hurricane Erin. Even Wikipedia listed it as the longest lasting hurricane of the 2001 season. Yet despite this, it was not reported on in the media.
Source and pic here
Originally posted by aboutface
reply to post by Six Sigma
*Grin* Yes, I know what was written, but a lot of it was written after the fact.