It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dainoyfb
Hi saltdog. I'm sorry, but I have to be critical here. I see a lot of advice here but nowhere do I see any legitimate sources sited. I don't see any mention of your credentials or examples of any research you've done that we can review. It all just kind of reads like pulp fiction. I like to believe ATS has a higher standard (despite the amount of unfounded, speculative writings that materialize here). I feel obligated to be critical of poorly conceived content in order to maintain and hopefully raise that standard. When you write a reference style OP, there is no value in it whatsoever if your information is not backed up.
Also, I'm a little surprised that with you being registered on ATS since 2009, your OP contains absolutely nothing that hasn't been hashed out in much greater detail, in numerous threads here already.
Again, I apologize, but I've completely missed the point.
Originally posted by dainoyfb
Hi saltdog. I'm sorry, but I have to be critical here. I see a lot of advice here but nowhere do I see any legitimate sources sited. I don't see any mention of your credentials or examples of any research you've done that we can review.
Originally posted by tovenar
Originally posted by dainoyfb
Hi saltdog. I'm sorry, but I have to be critical here. I see a lot of advice here but nowhere do I see any legitimate sources sited. I don't see any mention of your credentials or examples of any research you've done that we can review.
Is that the best you can do? "sources, please"; "provide evidence please", and "pix or it didn't happen??? And credentials? Really? Like if he filmed a fake survivor show where he lectured you about survival and then went home to eat supper with the film crew?
Honestly, there are no "legitimate sources" for survival. Even the government studies on EMP are an exercise in speculative fiction. You mention research, as if FEMA had learned something from its non-response to Katrina, or its non-response to the LA riots, or its non-response to the San Francisco earthquake.
I do have professional experience in emergency management; but I'm not about to post it here for your 'critical review.' Measure every post based on the strength of its ideas, rather than on what credential someone waves around. And Saltdog is a lot closer to the real issues than 90% of the posts in the survival forum.
If you wanted to give a valid critique of his OP, you could have said that he doesn't explicate his ideas well---almost like he has a concept but isn't willing to write three introductory sentences to get his point across.
So let me see if I can get his basic ideas across:
1. With 85% of the US population living in urban settings, and similar numbers for Europe and English speaking countries generally, there should be more focus at ATS on urban survival.
2. Some threats will be so widespread that fleeing your particular city doesn't really lessen the threat to your life, it simply removes you from your resources. For example, an epidemic that is nation wide. Fleeing to a remote location will expose you to far more carriers along the way, than simply holing up for 2 weeks in a suburban enclave---especially if the neighbors bug out.
3. If you live in a suburb, chances are that you will need to travel 50 miles or more to reach any rural retreat. And the thought of covering 50 miles of cityscape during riot and mayhem and societal collapse sounds far more dangerous than merely staying put, while your neighbors flee...you.
4. If you can manage to feed yourself for the first 2 weeks, the 90% of the population that made no preparations will have already spent itself and largely dissipated. While it is speculation, we can plausibly imagine a population collapse that begins immediately, as diabetics miss their dosages, kidney patients cannot get dialysis, and prisoners are left to starve in their jail cells. Hour by hour, nurses and firefighters deserting their posts mean that minor medical emergencies are now transformed into a virtual death sentence. Fights at the corner grocery spread to riots at the corner drugstore, then to restaurants and schools---anywhere that food was stored. Once the electricity goes down, the water supply runs out in 3 or 4 days, and the real suffering begins. If you still have your own food and water stores, you have the energy to prepare food and stay clean. But the others begin to lose energy as their intake falls below 1000kcal per day, and dehydration causes lassitude and ennui.
15 days into this scenario, a well-rested, well-fed person, suitably armed and equipped, would emerge like a time-traveler to take control of the local situation. One can actually imagine less risk in emerging from your lair into a deserted city, than traveling to a national forest and facing a rootless army of drunken but well-armed "survivalists" itching for open battle.
Saltdog's concepts are definitely there, even if he didn't spell them out. Speculation is a tool for the survivalist, as a thought-experiment. On the other hand, if he's writing a research paper for a sophomore English class, you are right and he had better cite (sic) some sources. But for speculation... no, credentials and sources matter less than compelling ideas and thought-out analysis.
Now, pardon me while I go alphabetize my bibliography page.
edit on 20-1-2012 by tovenar because: I rock
Originally posted by kingoddball
Great post.
I love the idea of taking water from the hot water systems. Such a great idea, commonsense, but I didn;t think of it!
Has anyone got other ideas for food? Other than raiding supermarkets (could be dangerous).
What are some good ways to fortify a home?
Also, what about weaponry? Other than guns.
Originally posted by sweetnlow
So on that note, you need to form a tribe or brotherhood of warriors, that know what they must do to defend against other bands.