It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DJW001
Soylent Green is exactly correct; it is a mountain standing out on the darkened floor of a crater. The Moon's terminator is a jumble of light and shadow. The Earth's atmosphere causes that swarming effect for the same reason that stars twinkle. The shadowy "tower" is a mirage caused by unsteady atmospheric conditions. In time, as he gets familiar with his telescope, he will no longer be puzzled by phenomena like this.
Originally posted by groingrinder
I do not think a Celestion 130 is capable of imaging the horizon of the moon at such detail. HOAX!
Originally posted by groingrinder
I do not think a Celestion 130 is capable of imaging the horizon of the moon at such detail. HOAX!
You're right it can't.
As I said I have a more powerful scope and I certainly can't see that detail.
Also with such magnification, any slight
Jerky movement would be amplified massively. You just
couldn't film it.
"Filmed January 5, 2012 @ 7 pm ....Tall water tower looking structure on the horizon of the moon. 4 clips in one. I filmed this using a celestron 130 telescope and a panasonic camcorder."
More specfic..."panasonic 78x zoom camcorder. i was optical zoomed at about 30. I used an 18mm eyepiece with a 2x barlow lense on the telescope"
Originally posted by groingrinder
I do not think a Celestion 130 is capable of imaging the horizon of the moon at such detail. HOAX!
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by groingrinder
I do not think a Celestion 130 is capable of imaging the horizon of the moon at such detail. HOAX!
I agree. A celestron 130 is a $500 telescope. There is no way it could get as close as this shows. Nobody shoul;d be drinking this Kool Aid.
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by groingrinder
I do not think a Celestion 130 is capable of imaging the horizon of the moon at such detail. HOAX!
I agree. A celestron 130 is a $500 telescope. There is no way it could get as close as this shows. Nobody shoul;d be drinking this Kool Aid.
Except that he claims he was using optical zoom from the camcorder as well. The image quality was not great. I'm not familiar with what result he would get from his set up, but also not ready to dismiss it based on other telescope images with different set ups.
For reference, here is a Celestron C8 with 7x optical zoom on the imaging device.
edit on 18-1-2012 by boncho because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by gortex
Whatever IT is IT has been filmed by someone else too .
Judging by the long shot at the end of the video (about 4.16) it's massiveedit on 18-1-2012 by gortex because: Edit to add
Originally posted by boncho
Except that he claims he was using optical zoom from the camcorder as well. The image quality was not great. I'm not familiar with what result he would get from his set up, but also not ready to dismiss it based on other telescope images with different set ups.
For reference, here is a Celestron C8 with 7x optical zoom on the imaging device.
Secondly, the video looks as if the pictures are taken from the moon's surface or at least close. they are at an angle. If he were using a telescope from Earth, the view would be from the top down.
Originally posted by Adaven I look at the moon mid phase all the time and you get some wonderful sights looking at the border between light and dark. I have even caught some rare "flashes" on the surface of the moon, twice.