Eliminating the need for men -- does it relate to eugenics?

Parts one and two of a video describing what may be the NWO design for society:

www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...

As the titles suggest, it is about how current trends connect to the Sexual Revolution, feminism and economics today. Is the new economy getting rid of the ability of men to compete and be able to support a family? Will new family structures come into play such as polygamy and polyandry? And most importantly, as many women see no need to have a man in their lives on a permanent basis, but still want the joys of motherhood, will sperm banks which are highly selective (eugenic) become increasingly popular and enable single women, lesbians and women with sterile husbands the opportunity to have higher quality sons and daughters? Is Brave New World just happening or is it part of a plan?

Dildo's and the Spice Girls' Girl Power were the beginning of the end - Topped off with Beyonce's Independent Woman

Well...the Chinese didn't get the memo...did they...

too bad for the women.
They have given up on the greatest con game ever.
They had it real good for centuries and now that they get the "equality" the feminists sought they now get to work 60 hrs a week, raise kids on their own and learn the business end of a pick and shovel like the russian women of the last century.
No more cherished role of mother and home builder, though I am sure I will hear about this great oppression SOME women suffered by the over bearing men that wanted them in the kitchens barefoot and pregnant.
No more doors opened for them, dinners bought, free drinks, etc...
Today they have bought into hot women+ hot men=hot sex as the goal for young women. They have become what they feared in the feminist movement, subjective objects to be used for sex.
But at least they get "equality". Now they can objectify themselves the same way men do.
It's not like men will ever fill that role, the ugly hairy ass beasts that we are...well, the metro-sexual men are getting prettier. But the gay men compete for them now,

I just cannot see how women gain in this.
In the end the pretty women will get picked up by the elite sugar daddies and the rest get to work in the fields and in the trenches with the non-breeders.
Once the men get excluded as breeders unless they are of good stock then the same will happen with the poor quality breeder women.
It won't be long that sex will be seperated from breeding by law.
Only the chosen, superior stock will be allowed and virtual reality sex for the rest so as not to interfere with the work of the lesser class of human chattel....But at least we will all be "equal". And Homer Simpson will be a memory and a by word used to remind the breeders that are chosen as a threat of what the men used to offer them.

As for the men right now.
hmmm, the best I can tell women all seem to have the same body parts and there are millions of pretty women out there.
I think once the porn addictions are dealt with and women are seen for what they are, a dime a dozen...well, they get the worst of the deal as the centuries old scam that had them as a cherished role as home maker and mother is lost and buried in the trenches they will help to dig.
Welcome to the idea of calloused hands and aching joints and muscles. And since all women are now for all men, I kinda like the idea of sharing the dinner bill, heck, I am looking forward to a girl paying for everything. As for now the independant women only seem to be for the sociopathic men that love to prey on the independant women that fall for their surface charm. SO where do women gain in this?
I see the young women losing the most in this new game as they are only seen as sexual beings in this by the new society norms. Well, while they get to remain as sexual objects. I simply don't see how women gain in this equation.
In the short term the big winners are 1'st, the sociopathic men that prey on independant women, 2"nd, the rest of the men that don't have the burden of wanted or unwanted families.
The big losers are ugly women. Even ugly men win in this equation.
All women have to let go of is wanting to raise familes as mothers and wives. Let that nurturing insticnt go and learn how accomplished men feel after a hard days work sweating and toiling in the hot sun. Nice trade for some I guess.
But from what I see, the centuries old scam of women as being cherished as mothers of our children is over.

Originally posted by manna2
too bad for the women.
They have given up on the greatest con game ever.
They had it real good for centuries and now that they get the "equality" the feminists sought they now get to work 60 hrs a week, raise kids on their own and learn the business end of a pick and shovel like the russian women of the last century.
No more cherished role of mother and home builder, though I am sure I will hear about this great oppression SOME women suffered by the over bearing men that wanted them in the kitchens barefoot and pregnant.
No more doors opened for them, dinners bought, free drinks, etc...
Today they have bought into hot women+ hot men=hot sex as the goal for young women. They have become what they feared in the feminist movement, subjective objects to be used for sex.
But at least they get "equality". Now they can objectify themselves the same way men do.
It's not like men will ever fill that role, the ugly hairy ass beasts that we are...well, the metro-sexual men are getting prettier. But the gay men compete for them now,

I just cannot see how women gain in this.
In the end the pretty women will get picked up by the elite sugar daddies and the rest get to work in the fields and in the trenches with the non-breeders.
Once the men get excluded as breeders unless they are of good stock then the same will happen with the poor quality breeder women.
It won't be long that sex will be seperated from breeding by law.
Only the chosen, superior stock will be allowed and virtual reality sex for the rest so as not to interfere with the work of the lesser class of human chattel....But at least we will all be "equal". And Homer Simpson will be a memory and a by word used to remind the breeders that are chosen as a threat of what the men used to offer them.

As for the men right now.
hmmm, the best I can tell women all seem to have the same body parts and there are millions of pretty women out there.
I think once the porn addictions are dealt with and women are seen for what they are, a dime a dozen...well, they get the worst of the deal as the centuries old scam that had them as a cherished role as home maker and mother is lost and buried in the trenches they will help to dig.
Welcome to the idea of calloused hands and aching joints and muscles. And since all women are now for all men, I kinda like the idea of sharing the dinner bill, heck, I am looking forward to a girl paying for everything. As for now the independant women only seem to be for the sociopathic men that love to prey on the independant women that fall for their surface charm. SO where do women gain in this?
I see the young women losing the most in this new game as they are only seen as sexual beings in this by the new society norms. Well, while they get to remain as sexual objects. I simply don't see how women gain in this equation.
In the short term the big winners are 1'st, the sociopathic men that prey on independant women, 2"nd, the rest of the men that don't have the burden of wanted or unwanted families.
The big losers are ugly women. Even ugly men win in this equation.
All women have to let go of is wanting to raise familes as mothers and wives. Let that nurturing insticnt go and learn how accomplished men feel after a hard days work sweating and toiling in the hot sun. Nice trade for some I guess.
But from what I see, the centuries old scam of women as being cherished as mothers of our children is over.

Lol. Deny Ignorance.

reply to post by manna2


Grabs Manna by the ear...drags him off to bathroom...washes mouth out with soap, and takes away tv privileges for a week.