Iran: We have proof US behind assassination

Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by superman2012

 

Considering it was an Act of war? Probably until we kill them all or they surrender. That is the point of war.

edit on 04/30/2011 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)

Have we seen the "proof" that Iran was involved? Why not kill everyone that doesn't live in the US then? Why not invade Saudi Arabia? The majority of the hijackers were from there.

Originally posted by superman2012

Why not invade Saudi Arabia? The majority of the hijackers were from there.

Well some of them are still alive in Morocco and were flabergasted when they saw their faces on CNN.

This wouldn't surprise me at all if it were true. But I am thinking that I have heard similar from Iran before, and the so called "proof" never originated. That isn't to say that they didn't have it, or do not have it now, because there are ways the US could keep the information from coming out...Bribes to Iran probably. They very well may accept a bribe and destroy evidence damning the US, because they are not stupid; especially if the bribe was juicy enough. Of course we would never know what it was, but maybe something to do with money, or technology, or...who knows...

However, I think Iran may say this regardless, simply to keep themselves relevant, and keep an open media channel to the world. They know that this will be a necessity in the event of an invasion or attack.

Originally posted by Brasov

Originally posted by jhn7537

Why would anyone ever want their enemy to get stronger?

You mean their unilaterally appointed enemies-of-choice, because Iran hasn't moved, it's still 9,000 Kms away from U.S. territory. It's the U.S. who are poking trouble at Iran's fence.

That's just how things are today... We may be 9000 Kms away, but some of our allies are much closer than that. We look out for our partners and our interests, I dont see anything wrong with that

reply to post by superman2012


It has been proven in a court of law of public peers with evidence presented from Captured and willing defectors from the Iranian intelligence community.

Perhaps you should read below.
-------------------------------------------------------------

Abolghasem Mesbahi, an Iranian who fled that country when he was tipped off by a colleague that he was on the regime's kill list, provided what Daniels deemed credible testimony. According to court documents, after Mesbahi left Iran, he received coded messages three times within two months prior to the 9/11 attacks; those messages demonstrate Iran's foreknowledge of an operation known as “Satan in Fire,” a term used to describe an attack on the United States that ultimately succeeded.

The other individual who was instrumental in connecting Iran to the 9/11 attacks was a man named Imad Mughniyah, who essentially served as the Hezbollah leader that worked with al-Qaeda while receiving direction from Iranian officials. Mughniyah was assassinated in Syria in February of 2008.

The case, known as Havlish v. Iran, may provide the clearest evidence yet of Iran's involvement in the worst attack on American soil. Documents show that Mughniyah and 9/11 attackers traveled on flights together and that individuals involved were repeatedly allowed to pass through Iran without having their passports stamped.

Originally posted by FlyersFan

Iran: We have proof US behind assassination

Yes .. sure .. it's probably just like all the 'proof' they have against all the 'spies' that they 'catch'. It's probably just like all the 'proof' they have against all the political prisoners.

I wouldn't take any so called 'proof' of theirs at face value. I'm still betting they off'd the guy themselves. It IS how they operate over there.

REALLY??? IS IT HOW THEY OPERATE OVER THERE???

Do you have PROOF!!! to back up such an ignorant and baseless accusation?? and i mean legitimate proof not some vague answer. I want digital copies of examples showing the Iran government killing their own scientists. Most of you people who push the status quo are so deluded its sad. Spewing government rhetoric and propergander like a drunken frat boy at spring break. Makes me sick how many people buy into this crap.

reply to post by yourboycal2


It is foolish.
If Iran had ANY proof, other than a chain email from some anti-US person on this site, it would be plastered in the news.
Iran needs to motivate the populous. They need to get all of Alah's children to strap on a cowards vest, and go kill innocent civilians! Blame the US for everything... Iran is so ignorant of how the world works, they pick through internet stories, then release an accusation, based on rumors.

Flame away all of you hypocrites, that loath the US, yet cuddle up with even worse delusional folks.

Go ahead, push the word.... Iran is morally sound in their actions and intentions.....

reply to post by THEDUDE86


I really don't think we (the US) were behind this....

My bet is on Israel.
ALL IN.

reply to post by TiM3LoRd

Spewing government rhetoric and propergander like a drunken frat boy at spring break

The media sensationalizes?? really? they do it for a career, you simply do it for attention...

No proof or facts are required when the gun is aimed at the US, but a list of documents are required when you blame an enemy of the US....

Originally posted by FlyersFan
I'm still betting they off'd the guy themselves. It IS how they operate over there.

You gotta have 5 or 6 sock accounts, no way there are that many people on this entire site who would believe this.

Any proof to back up how they operate.

Originally posted by milkyway12
reply to post by superman2012

 

It has been proven in a court of law of public peers with evidence presented from Captured and willing defectors from the Iranian intelligence community.

Perhaps you should read below.
-------------------------------------------------------------

Abolghasem Mesbahi, an Iranian who fled that country when he was tipped off by a colleague that he was on the regime's kill list, provided what Daniels deemed credible testimony. According to court documents, after Mesbahi left Iran, he received coded messages three times within two months prior to the 9/11 attacks; those messages demonstrate Iran's foreknowledge of an operation known as “Satan in Fire,” a term used to describe an attack on the United States that ultimately succeeded.

The other individual who was instrumental in connecting Iran to the 9/11 attacks was a man named Imad Mughniyah, who essentially served as the Hezbollah leader that worked with al-Qaeda while receiving direction from Iranian officials. Mughniyah was assassinated in Syria in February of 2008.

The case, known as Havlish v. Iran, may provide the clearest evidence yet of Iran's involvement in the worst attack on American soil. Documents show that Mughniyah and 9/11 attackers traveled on flights together and that individuals involved were repeatedly allowed to pass through Iran without having their passports stamped.

edit on 04/30/2011 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)

Please list your sources and also why no answer to my question? Why isn't the US attacking Saudi Arabia?

Originally posted by bekod
reply to post by Kram09

 

Nah no nukes just a few Daisy Cutter will do, AKA BLU-82B/C-130 weapon system, nicknamed Commando Vault in Vietnam and Daisy Cutter in Afghanistan, is a high altitude delivery of 15,000 pound conventional bomb, which dropped in down town nuke central would do the job of saying your nuke days are done, oh some of you will say what good will that do it is deep down , , do we all need to know the US weapons sys. ok so you say Bull snot, well it in not BS www.bloomberg.com... from the link

B-2 Bomber Gets Boeing’s New 30,000-Pound Bunker-Buster Bomb
Q
By Tony Capaccio - Nov 14, 2011 10:00 PM MT

Hay Iran can you say catch?

Yeah well now they call it MOAB. I prefer they drop one on Iran's HQ and Amadinanut first. I am sure this will be more proof like the paper & clay drone clone. If it was CIA then Iran would never know about it.

reply to post by Brasov


Are you a person that believes anything that agrees with his view.

IT HAS BEEN PROVEN, that the "they are not dead crowd" is a bunch of BS...

They are NOT the same people, simply people with the same names.. If there was a hijacker named Dave Smith, would that hijacker be alive until the last Dave Smith is dead? Wake up, stop being so ignorant of the facts!

reply to post by superman2012


Obvious answer!

"Because we do not have any reason to attack Saudia Arabia"

Would you like a more comic book, D&D, world of warcraft answer?

reply to post by superman2012


Because they are last on the list, that's their most holiest place. That would be a sure fire way to get them all to come after us at once.

Originally posted by jhn7537

That's just how things are today... We may be 9000 Kms away, but some of our allies are much closer than that. We look out for our partners and our interests, I dont see anything wrong with that

Would you see anything wrong if China overtook you militarily and economically and one day proceed to Shock & Awe you, invade you, exterminated 15% of your population and steal what's left of your resources?

reply to post by superman2012


www.cbsnews.com...

---------------------------------------------------------------
Many Americans don't believe Saudi Arabia is on the same side as the United States, says Rachel Bronson, director of Middle East and

Gulf Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. Most Americans and many members of Congress, she says, believe that Saudi Arabia is not doing enough to curb terrorist financing and Islamic extremism at home and--in particular--abroad. "There's a feeling that [the Saudis aren't] stepping up," she says. Reported links between Saudi Arabian government officials and terrorist financing in the congressional report on 9/11 have exacerbated
tensions.


Considering relation ships are strained? Saudia Arabia is not declaring actively death to America and Israel. They may be doing things under the table , but they arnt declaring to their world they want to Usher in Armageddon.

-------

We need Allies in the Middle East and the most significant threats need to be dealt with first. Iran is one of these threats. Also Arabia has a Monarch / Ruling Council. The government is split in Issues regarding the US , diplomacy can still work. Iran there is no hope of diplomacy. The entire religious / governmental leaders are Radical Islamist.

reply to post by Shermanator


Every reason being used to attack Iran, you can apply to Saudi Arabia, gay right, stonings, women rights, and oh ya, they, Saudi,s were directly involved in 911, Iran had no involvement.

Originally posted by Shermanator
reply to post by superman2012

 

I'll talk to you like I talk to my 3 year old.

"Because we do not have any reason to attack Saudia Arabia"

Would you like a more comic book, D&D, world of warcraft answer?

What is your problem? I asked a question that I wanted an answer too. Not directed at you. I barely pay attention to your insipid posts, they are just filler between the grown up posts. You have all the reason to attack Saudi Arabia, their people were instrumental in your 9/11 attacks. Iran conveniently turns out to be behind it as of Dec. 23/11. Convenient. They people need a new boogeyman. Look for some facts in the sand that your head is stuck in.

reply to post by milkyway12

Perhaps you should do some research before you make Non-factual facts you make fact from your opinion.

I have no idea what you are trying to say with that. I merely asked you a question. How did I "make non-factual facts I make fact from my opinion"? I don't care what the American people think of Saudi Arabia, I care why the government isn't attacking them when they identify countries behind 9/11.