David Wilcock: Defeating the greatest cover-up of all time, page 1

+70 more
posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 04:12 AM

link

Just found out the newest David Wilcock report is up. This is the follow up to the Trillion dollar lawsuit.
This report is MASSIVE, with lots of verifiable information. Extremely well done. I have not even had the time to finish it myself yet, so will update this OP later with more info.

Imagine if your family had a quarter million dollars saved -- and then someone robbed you. What if the thief then told everyone what he did – but no one cared enough to do anything? That’s what just happened to every single family in the United States of America.

26 TRILLION DOLLARS OF FRAUD Thanks to heroic efforts of Congressman Ron Paul, former Congressman Alan Grayson and Congressman Bernie Sanders to audit the Federal Reserve, we now know that the Federal Reserve secretly lent out 26 trillion dollars' worth of American money from 2007 to 2010 -- much of it to foreign banks.

Since 9/11, Americans and much of the Western world have been led to believe that the biggest enemy they face is terrorism from Islamic extremists. Nonetheless, there is now overwhelming, undeniable evidence that the true enemy... is within. You are about to read a comprehensive investigation summarizing all the best information I have gathered about the true nature of this crisis since I became directly aware of it in 1992. Very few people are aware that a massive 122-nation coalition has formed to solve the problem -- just in the nick of time – and they are backing a legal, public solution to end Financial Tyranny.

Ben had David direct me to the "Unwanted Publicity Intelligence" website, which contains extremely sensitive documents. I was astonished when I reviewed this website, considering that I was told it is very dangerous to publish pictures of the Federal Reserve bonds. A week later, on January 6th, David and his eight-year-old son Mackie burned to death in their home. Hardly anything recognizable was left. Accelerants were found outside and arson has not been ruled out.

www.divinecosmos.com...

edit on 14-1-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)

The Sword

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 04:14 AM

link

Who are the 122 nations that David is constantly speaking of and where can we verify this?

I think he's just feeding nonsense to people to get their hopes up.

BlindSunGod

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 04:43 AM

link

reply to post by The Sword

This came out like a month ago. David received death threats after the release. You should look into Benjamin Fulford. This is no BS.

NeoVain

+12 more
posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 05:07 AM

link

Originally posted by The Sword
Who are the 122 nations that David is constantly speaking of and where can we verify this?

I think he's just feeding nonsense to people to get their hopes up.

In no way did you look at the evidence before you posted that.

From the article:

WHAT DO YOU SAY TO THE SKEPTICS? Most people go with the “gut” rather than with scientific facts. Go ahead and try to tell someone that a “super-entity” of 147 corporations appears to be running the world, and those corporations are completely interconnected with the Federal Reserve – which handed out 26 trillion dollars in bailouts, without any regulation or oversight from the American government. You may find yourself coming face-to-face with very strong denial, ridicule and attack -- even in the face of undeniable evidence.

CranialSponge

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 05:18 AM

link

Everybody is more than welcome to read through the Fed Reserve audit, breaking down the audit findings where the funds went, it's about 266 pages long.

The Big Audit (.pdf file)

And here's a youtube video of Keith Olbermann interviewing Alan Grayson back in November:

spoor

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 05:27 AM

link

Originally posted by The Sword
Who are the 122 nations that David is constantly speaking of and where can we verify this?

There is nothing to verify, David is just making it up - which is why he refuses to list the 122 nations, as if he did people would check and find out it is juat another of his lies.

I think he's just feeding nonsense to people to get their hopes up.

Very true.

spoor

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 05:28 AM

link

Originally posted by BlindSunGod
David received death threats after the release.

No, he CLAIMED to have received death threats - there is a huge difference!

This is no BS.

yes it is.

raivo

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 05:30 AM

link

Originally posted by The Sword

I think he's just feeding nonsense to people to get their hopes up.

you have to stop using your brain & start buying his stuff because if you do aliens will come! Believe in me!

ok, Wilcock is a fraud & loser.

The Sword

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 05:55 AM

link

reply to post by NeoVain

What evidence?

This is old news, albeit with another update from David.

I just hope he's right. That's all.

NeoVain

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 06:04 AM

link

reply to post by The Sword

Maybe you should look at the article before you speak. This is no old news.

Written by David Wilcock Friday, 13 January 2012 13:13

The Sword

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 06:05 AM

link

reply to post by NeoVain

Wilcock talked about this in previous articles so it IS old news.

He just posted an update. Nothing new.

NeoVain

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 06:45 AM

link

Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by NeoVain

Wilcock talked about this in previous articles so it IS old news.

He just posted an update. Nothing new.

Are you for real? You didn´t even look at the article!

This is BIG!!!!

GlobalControl

+26 more
posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 06:46 AM

link

Most of your discrediting the article are disinfo SHILLS! I just wanted to state that for the record.

Those of you willing to READ the article will find some very new and GROUNDBREAKING evidence.

Do not be discouraged to read this article for it has VALUABLE information CRITICAL to the current situation.

He links to his sources just like in his book so don't believe all the fools who want you to stay ignorant of the TRUTH.

THIS ARTICLE HAS THE TRUTH again THIS ARTICLE HAS THE TRUTH.

I warn you there is NO CENSORSHIP i repeat NO CENSORSHIP.

I Love You All

sailormon

+3 more
posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 07:38 AM

link

reply to post by GlobalControl

Ok, due to the shills on here as well as on ufo posts, I look at this and other reports as being more legitimate. Thanks for the negative comments, it usually shows the actual validity of a subject. Well on to the reading of Davids report with an open mind.

St Udio

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 07:52 AM

link

Originally posted by NeoVain
reply to post by The Sword

Maybe you should look at the article before you speak. This is no old news.

Written by David Wilcock Friday, 13 January 2012 13:13

now, we know the Friday the 13th (publication date) has a stigma attached to it...

perhaps the UN-Lucky part is contained in the info, or perhaps in the updated material itself--- or perhaps the unluckyness will fall upon the authors

or

is the Friday the 13th publication date just a tricky, catchy hook.... to snare the Conspiracy Theorists on the social media Web-Net...

as in "Publicity Stunt" !

thanks for the time[./i]

GlobalControl

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 09:30 AM
link

just read it jeeeeeeeez

Ikema

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 10:22 AM
link

How do we know these negative replies are just not the results of those “Chinese boys”? I read part 1, there is a boatload of reference available. It's a lot of work and a lot of reading, but I recommend it to anyone whose mind can deal. I can see a lot of people, shutting down over this.

At the same time, “the truth is out there” and “we can make a difference” so please do not despair.

“… Fill in name/thing” I love you, please forgive me, I'm sorry, and thank you.”

The above is one of the most powerful mantras available. Say it while meditating on “wrongs” you may have committed towards others. Start your own tsunami of positive thinking.

Love, Ikema

wildtimes

+20 more
posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 10:50 AM
link

This report seems absolutely legitimate to me. And I have to wonder if some of gainsayers
(for example, "TheSword," a "Humble Janitor", living in the "Republic of Virginia") really are paid shills.
Just the choice of screen-name, sub-title, and location are pretty revealing, really.

Anyone with a brain can see that this article is well-researched, with provable facts. How on Earth could someone deny it, unless they had a death-threat over their own heads (or a paycheck) to do so?

here's part extracted of the math, folks, and the most important question:

The full figure of 26 trillion adds up to nearly a quarter million dollars per household – $226,430.68 to be exact.

When you put it in those terms, the full weight of the theft becomes nothing short of staggering.

Imagine if your family had a quarter million dollars saved -- and then someone robbed you. What if the thief then told everyone what he did – but no one cared enough to do anything?

That’s what just happened to every single family in the United States of America.

Every single adult in the United States who was unemployed or on public assistance could have been given a job – so they can lead a happy, fulfilling and prosperous life – with plenty of money to spare.

A vast public works program could easily have been created to stimulate the economy – so that the money would become an investment, not a one-time gift.

WHAT COULD WE HAVE DONE?

Think What we Could Have Done, people!

These points, made above, and absolutely what we SHOULD have done, and what we SHOULD be doing, for our OWN countryment. We need to BUTT. OUT. of the rest of the world's houses until our own is in order. And that is NOT Socialism, or Communism, no matter what you Capitalist Oligarchs want to call it.

Shameful. Our country's leaders and its financial racketeers and criminal ponzi schemers are a DISGRACE to our nation.

It bring tears to my eyes, really.

WHAT COULD WE HAVE DONE?
*We could have built high-speed bullet trains ..
*We could have restored our archaic, battered fleet of passenger airliners...
*We could have restored our crumbling roads and bridges...
*We could have transformed the inner cities...
*We could have massively upgraded the nation’s fiber-optic capabilities
*We could have completely modernized public schools with enough computers for every kid.
*We could have trained or hired teachers to educate our children in the skills and software needed to be competitive in today’s evolving workforce
*We could have [encouraged kids interest in music] an incentive for good grades.
*We could have boldly invested in clean energy technologies

And, as Foster Gamble revealed in his groundbreaking independent film Thrive, we could have ended poverty and environmental destruction for as little as 200 billion dollars a year.

Instead of doing any of this, the "one percent" continued to live the lifestyles of the rich and famous -- while the poor sank ever deeper into the Next Great Depression, as economist Paul Krugman recently called it.

But, no. "We" didn't.
edit on 14-1-2012 by wildtimes because: (no reason given)

Ear-Responsible

posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 11:02 AM
link

Lol @ trusting David Wilcock about anything he says. You'd think he'd get some things right here and there being the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce and all..

angeldoll

+15 more
posted on Jan, 14 2012 @ 12:00 PM
link

I spent the better part of the morning reading the article in it's entirety, and found it excellent reading. (I kept trying to "star" much of it,lol) Some of the claims are dubious, but are nonetheless NOT based on BS, as some people are posting. It's easy to come in and criticize a massive research and work of another, with no real argument to prove he is wrong on all fronts, because clearly, he isn't.

Anyone interested in finding the group that really runs the world would do well to begin here. Why not add to a work, or use research to disprove it? Help to establish the "122 countries" yourself", as opposed to those coming in with a cheap one-liner.

It's really quite a simple thing, and takes somewhat of a simple, parroted intelligence to come in and say this is all rubbish. Some of it, quite a few of us have known for sometime, but the historical data for those who don't simply makes it a more interesting and comprehensive document. Plus, it's not all old. There are a range of insights given.

I'm just asking that you stop the useless one-liners. Back it up. If you know so much more, and can prove more, then so much the better. Please do.