It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sirric
Originally posted by dawnprince
I'm sorry , but I'm really not buying all this new age bull .
I wager I can stand on a stage and channel Elvis Presley and it would be no more believible than what I have witnessed so far .
Faith is not scientific proof . You have faith becuase you have been duped .
Duped by WHAT?
He's been channeling for over 20 years and many thing he had spoken about in the past have now been proven possible through Quantum Physics.
So an actor is able to come up with Quantum theorems before actual physicist can? Get real and quite being such a pessimistic person.
And no I will not do your homework for you if you don't believe me, you will have to find out on your own.
Sirric
edit on 13/1/12 by sirric because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Huggiesunrise
Bashar is one of the few air tight sources of information I've come across. Over time and practice Darryl has brought plethora's of information that has turned out to be true and provable.
Anyone nay saying will have decades of material to rebut before ill take them seriously.
Originally posted by The GUT
Originally posted by Huggiesunrise
Bashar is one of the few air tight sources of information I've come across. Over time and practice Darryl has brought plethora's of information that has turned out to be true and provable.
Anyone nay saying will have decades of material to rebut before ill take them seriously.
I'll bite. What info has Bashar/Anka provided--one or two samples will do for now--that you consider new and "air tight"?
Originally posted by Huggiesunrise
Anyone nay saying will have decades of material to rebut before ill take them seriously.
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
Originally posted by Huggiesunrise
Anyone nay saying will have decades of material to rebut before ill take them seriously.
Hmmmm... would 4 decades of experience with non-corporeal intelligences qualify One to speak? It should, it covers the entire spectrum of communication.
Or, how about a lifetime (65 years) as a telepath? And, on that, I can tell you it takes decades of practice to get it right.
Bashar, and ALL the others are frauds! All they give you is their own thinking, their own thoughts, which may, or may not have anything to do with reality.
The reality is; you know nothing about ET, and all that has been told to you is false.
Etharzi od Oma
Originally posted by kauskau
lol that is what u learned after all that time? So you dont trust yourself ? Sad
Originally posted by kauskau
do me a favour: tell me-> what is the exact difference between telepathy and channeling ..and try to differentiate it in a non judgmental way
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
Originally posted by kauskau
do me a favour: tell me-> what is the exact difference between telepathy and channeling ..and try to differentiate it in a non judgmental way
The differences can be difficult to quantify, and many of them must be experienced.
However, there are some differences I can give you.
*Chaneling is the opening up of the mind to any and all influences.
*Channeling employed NO FILTERS.
*Any thought may manifest in the channeler, usually his own, but, sometime thughts from another. The source of these "other" thoughts is frequently unknown, and any identification given by the channeled is frequently a lie.
Contrast to telepathy
*Telepathy is the openig of the mind to a specific "other"
*All other influences are filtered.
*Any thoughts by either particiant is known to the other. This actually extends to emotional states, and feelings. Very advanced telepaths can even access the senses of the other (touch, sight, hearing, etc.)
Channelers tend to say what they "think" they heard, but, make no attempt at verifying the thought, or the sender.
In telepathy, One has a very intimate connection with the sender.
Etharzi od Oma
Originally posted by kauskau
how can you state in that arrogance that channeling is not also a valid form of communicating the thoughts of another being. There is no real difference between channeling and telepathy in a physical way. Both is tuning in "other" frequencies. Telepathy involves the ego of the "reader"" and channeling is more like making space for another energy.
Originally posted by kauskau
reply to post by AnthraAndromda
Thats true. Thats why you need to trust in yourself and learn how to meditate because in certain moods you can not attract lower beings.
So now you seem to understand that a good channeler is not communicating his own thoughts but his own language and concepts to translate other thoughts.