It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SurrealisticPillow
reply to post by Littikani
See, your post is a great example of why Paul supporters don't take you seriously.
Your intent is really not to learn his platform or what he believes, is it?
If you want someone to hold your hand and throw flowers your way...pretty easy to find. I am sure Gingrich and Romney love those that are that easy to please.
Getting "off topic" means you are discussing issues that don't pertain to the OP, that is what I tried to point out to you. I am not against it, however. Just be real.
As for Paul's numbers, the link showed how they are rising. Did you read it? I am quite aware that the DNC doesn't listen to their voters either, as Obama's numbers in the primary are far above his actual support within the Democratic Party.
Originally posted by Ben81
why did she say its like the Israeli Arab conflict
zionist at CNN always bring that up
she is a proud zionist thats for sure
Originally posted by Sek82
She deserved it. She has directly demonstrated her bias against Ron Paul on live TV, therefore she has no business reporting on him while claiming to be fair or balanced...
For everyone's sake, CNN should swap her out with someone that actually is unbiased towards him. She appeared to be a hair away from losing it there, with all those polite and honest questions being directed at her from Paul's supporters. How unfair.
In other news, you know anti-Paul ATS members are grasping for straws to display their distaste for Ron Paul when they fall back on the "cult members" gabfest.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
I am worried about corporate elitism and the government utilizing illegitimate authority to steamroll over me and destroy my family over utter bs.
Originally posted by redrose123
reply to post by Littikani
The difference is a news broadcasting service is not just a personal business.
They are there saying and people relying on them giving the facts of events.
If they are another tabloid then they need to quit telling everyone that they are news service.
The actual MSM is now what use to be alternative news. In my opinion they should all be treated the way Canada just treated Fox (Faux) news.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
She said it was a little scary... You guys should listen. Sometimes Paul supporters come across as a cult. It's scary to people who are not aware of what's going on in this country.
Your avarice for getting Ron Paul elected is scaring people away. People like these supporters TURN ME OFF of Ron Paul. Every time I see something like this, I wonder if you know how you're appearing to people who AREN'T head over heels in love with Paul.
If you want to continue to get what you're getting (news media ignoring Paul and saying he's 'unelectable', calling him 'out there' and his supporters 'crazed and forceful') keep doing what you're doing.
:shk:
Originally posted by Maluhia
Fox News noticed Dana's bias -
Judge Napolitano Reports on Super PAC's Call for Dana Bash Reassignment
Anyone who's taken one journalism class knows - no personal opinions allowed!edit on 13-1-2012 by Maluhia because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Littikani
CNN is a private company and Ron Paul supporters here are protesting the fact that CNN does not want to do business with them.
Oh god the irony.
Any Ron Paul supporter out there even get that?
What was wrong with the CRA according to Ron Paul?
It took away your freedom to decide who you do business with (Not in reality) but that is his answer.
Keep protesting CNN choosing not to do business with you.
#ing hilarious!
Originally posted by CaptainIraq
Not at all. They were protesting CNN for providing a fraudulent service, that service being journalism.
The reporter claimed multiple times that her reporting was 'objective', when it is clearly not.
Providing fraudulent services (i.e., the entire MSM) has no place in a free market.
Originally posted by Maluhia
reply to post by Littikani
Michelle - you need to calm down. A little bored now that the kids are back in school? Barry's preoccupied with his wars and executive orders. Taking over the world is a hard job. Ron Paul is his biggest threat, I know, but you really want to go back to Chicago anyway, don't you?
edit on 14-1-2012 by Maluhia because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Littikani
Originally posted by muzzleflash
I am worried about corporate elitism and the government utilizing illegitimate authority to steamroll over me and destroy my family over utter bs.
See right here. As far as I cant tell, much of what Ron Paul stands for equates to giving corporations even more power. I have tried to address this and all I ever get in response is called names.
So either I am wrong and I should be corrected so that I might change my mind
or
I am wrong and I am bad person for not just being right already and should stay wrong
or
I am right.
I feel safe I will get an answer soon.
Originally posted by Littikani
How many posts in this thread attacked me on a personal level and made me want to hate Ron Paul supporters?
How many posts in this thread addressed my concerns and got me to plan to vote for Ron Paul?
Also known as a continuing misrepresentation, a lie by omission occurs when an important fact is left out in order to foster a misconception. Lying by omission includes failures to correct pre-existing misconceptions. When the seller of a car declares it has been serviced regularly but does not tell that a fault was reported at the last service, the seller lies by omission.
Cronyism is partiality to long-standing friends, especially by appointing them to positions of authority, regardless of their qualifications.
Cronyism exists when the appointer and the beneficiary are in social contact; often, the appointer is inadequate to hold his or her own job or position of authority, and for this reason the appointer appoints individuals who will not try to weaken him or her, or express views contrary to those of the appointer.