It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
It turns out Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, the author of the controversial Stop Online Piracy Act, has been caught red-handed infringing copyright himself with an image used on his personal Web site.
An investigative report by Vice found a photo on Smith's campaign site had infringed the copyright and never credited the source.
Here's how it went down.
Vice checked out an archived version of Smith's Web site using the Wayback Machine and found it once used a background image of a stock photo of a colorful woodland scene created by a photographer named D.J. Schulte.
"I do not see anywhere on the screen capture that you have provided that the image was attributed to the source (me)," Schulte wrote on Flickr.
If SOPA, which would give the government power to shut down any Web site in violation of online piracy rules, passes, Schulte said he would be entitled to file a suit against its creator, Lamar Smith.
"So my conclusion would be that Lamar Smith's organization did improperly use my image. So according to the SOPA bill, should it pass, maybe I could petition the court to take action against texansforlamarsmith.com."
6
Originally posted by Believer101
Well isn't that just hilarious.
Mr. Smith is a definite hypocrite.
Also, just my thoughts on the matter, but if movie and music companies don't want their stuff on the internet, why don't they make their CD's and DVD's with a safe-guard for that stuff? I know it's possible as I had a DVD with one of those anti-piracy safe-guards on it.
And to add to that statement, if movie companies don't want their movies to be pirated, why do they GIVE you, yes they literally GIVE you, a digital copy to upload onto your computer?? They're basically saying "We don't want anyone pirating our movies, but here! Have a digital copy to upload onto the internet!"edit on 12/1/2012 by Believer101 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SpaceJockey1
Pretty much a similar scenario to those morons that abused the copyright on that annoying Anti-piracy message & music that starts before most DVD's or movies play!
The trouble with all these fools wanting to mess with everything, is that once they get a piece of legislation passed, they get bored and have to find something else to MEDDLE with...basically there's no friggin end to all!
Originally posted by Rafe_
6
Originally posted by Believer101
Well isn't that just hilarious.
Mr. Smith is a definite hypocrite.
Also, just my thoughts on the matter, but if movie and music companies don't want their stuff on the internet, why don't they make their CD's and DVD's with a safe-guard for that stuff? I know it's possible as I had a DVD with one of those anti-piracy safe-guards on it.
And to add to that statement, if movie companies don't want their movies to be pirated, why do they GIVE you, yes they literally GIVE you, a digital copy to upload onto your computer?? They're basically saying "We don't want anyone pirating our movies, but here! Have a digital copy to upload onto the internet!"edit on 12/1/2012 by Believer101 because: (no reason given)
The DVD encryption 'CCS' was hacked the day the first one was commercially released. Those safeguards you talk of were root-kits which they stopped using because A.They got hacked anyway and B.They kept losing court cases over them every time the end users sued them over it since the root-kits were not inline with your rights and wrecked your system.
The additional downloads are protected by DRM which still does not prevend them from being hacked but the regular joe smoe has to google through at least a link or 2 to find out how to bypass it.
the simple fact of it all is that nothing can be protected by a system since every system needs a key so the legitimate end-user can acces the product. It is the fundamental flaw to any protective system like this but the biggest problem is the distribution of these products which is easily spread by use of the internet.
By creating something like the SOPA you basicly get a dictatorship over the net and as a bonus it will give TPTB potentially almost absolute control over what you say and do on the net.China for instance has handled the internet like that since day one but never to combat piracy,they also never hid the fact that it is to control content delivered and spread amongst their people.
all in all piracy is their excuse to make the pesky internet as it exists today go away.
"The criticism of this bill is completely hypothetical; none of it is based in reality," Smith said in a statement to Roll Call. "Not one of the critics was able to point to any language in the bill that would in any way harm the Internet. Their accusations are simply not supported by any facts."~Rep. Lamar Smith
"It’s a vocal minority, he said. "Because they’re strident doesn’t mean they’re either legitimate or large in number. One, they need to read the language. Show me the language. There’s nothing they can point to that does what they say it does do. I think their fears are unfounded."
Hundreds of thousands of letters sent? Nearly 90,000 calls in a single day? This is not a "vocal minority." This is a large and growing segment of the population who is very, very concerned. And, they have shown him the language, contrary to his blatantly false claims. Dismissing the concerns of pretty much the entire tech sector and their users (not to mention the folks over at Reddit...) doesn't seem wise. It seems like someone who doesn't understand the internet, not just in trying to regulate it, but in how the internet can be used to rally support against those who seek to damage it.