It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Should we blame Bush again?
Originally posted by CaticusMaximus
Lol, of course they are up. All those supposed new workers in sept - dec where all SEASONAL employees. Im betting the numbers are padded here, like usual, too, because almost all seasonal positions are terminated after new years. The select few get permanent positions, but 90% or more are just dropped, as per the agreement of seasonal employance, but the numbers of course dont want to show that... that would be to much truthedit on 1/12/2012 by CaticusMaximus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by monkofmimir
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Should we blame Bush again?
why not hes still in office, he's just had a heck load of cosmetic surgery and changed his name.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by monkofmimir
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Should we blame Bush again?
why not hes still in office, he's just had a heck load of cosmetic surgery and changed his name.
And Romney isn't much different. Romney - meet the white Obama
I never thought I'd miss Bill Clinton, but after what we've had to deal with for the past 12 years (and what we are facing in 2012 - Obama or Romney) I'm starting to look back on the Clinton years with almost a homesickness ....
(for Bill ?? really?? Someone cyberslap me!! )
Originally posted by usernameconspiracy
Why do people always blame a President for the unemployment rate? What the hell did any President have to do with employment? A business makes a decision to hire or not hire. A business makes the decision to lay off or not lay off. They do not call the President to see what the recommendation is.
Funny how everyone yells for "less government" but demands to know FROM THE PRESIDENT where the jobs are. Stupid, really.
Originally posted by usernameconspiracy
Why do people always blame a President for the unemployment rate? What the hell did any President have to do with employment? A business makes a decision to hire or not hire. A business makes the decision to lay off or not lay off. They do not call the President to see what the recommendation is.
Funny how everyone yells for "less government" but demands to know FROM THE PRESIDENT where the jobs are. Stupid, really.
Originally posted by haarvik
reply to post by usernameconspiracy
Probably because his job is to pass/veto bills that kill/grow jobs.
His job is also to oversee the budget and any necessary cuts.
When you push for legislation that impacts the private sector, you are directly responsible for that fallout.
Universal healthcare is one. There are others, but that one is the biggie. Most companies health care costs have tripled since that little piece of trash was shoved down our throats. I know, I work for a health insurance broker!
When you triple the costs of employee benefits, the money has to come from somewhere. And either you get rid of people, or you cut their benefits. Companies will cut the workforce first.edit on 1/12/2012 by haarvik because: (no reason given)
The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is signed into law by President Bill Clinton. Clinton said he hoped the agreement would encourage other nations to work toward a broader world-trade pact.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by ldyserenity
Clinton gave us 4 years of budget SURPLUSES! Remember?
Of course, he got some help from Newt and the invention of the World Wide Web.
Originally posted by haarvik
reply to post by Eurisko2012
WOW!
Read between the lines.
Michelle Obama just called the American people stupid!
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Should we blame Bush again?
Originally posted by ldyserenity
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by ldyserenity
Clinton gave us 4 years of budget SURPLUSES! Remember?
Of course, he got some help from Newt and the invention of the World Wide Web.
This pertains to NAFTA specifically.and there also is the fact that we knew the repercussions that NAFTA would create wouldn't be felt for many years and now we are seeing that come to fruition, not that Reagan didn't pass laws that screwed us, too...actually every president in the last forty years has not helped the situation, but that's besides the point, the lobbyests are really where the blame should lie and their corporate puppet masters, but let's go ahead and blame President XYZ...etc.
Originally posted by Open_Minded Skeptic
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Should we blame Bush again?
And the Republican party in general, yes.
The damage done to this country economically and politically during the Bush regime is of such magnitude that it can't be undone in a short period of time. Especially with the rest of the GOP doing everything they can to "make Obama a one-term President" and to hell with the country in the meantime.
Obama has not been as effective as he should have been, or could have been, but yes, the fundamental problem is due to the policies implemented during the Bush regime.
Painful to hear, but true.