It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11: A Boeing 757 Struck the Pentagon

page: 282
102
<< 279  280  281    283  284  285 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2008 @ 05:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Kidfinger
 
I want to believe this and it is very well done, But where are the Body parts? I am for real. This was a Airliner. I saw nothing. ATS, I really want to believe you. I just can not as yet. Samuel D. Danner



posted on Dec, 22 2008 @ 03:51 PM
link   
jump in the boat, sam! theres lots of us that cant grasp it all. youre not alone!



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 09:04 AM
link   
Of course a plane didn't hit the building. No one could keep the plane a few meters from the ground. The hole in the wall doesn't have any wing or stabilizer damage. Are we to believe the wings didn't even damage the limestone? Most of the plane and all the unverified passengers were disinegrated which is absolute nonsense. The plane and passengers didn't simply disappear. Shame on all those involved!!! Maybe in 10 or 20 years when some people (who are in the know) are on death's bed suddenly grow a conscious and tell the truth. Truth, now that's an interesting word. Money and power, the two things that have ruined our world.



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 12:28 PM
link   
So far, after seven whole years, every attempt to refute the overwhelming evidence that AA77 hit the Pentagon has failed. There is a whole list of questions that 9/11 Truthers who claim no jet hit the Pentagon have been asked all those years about their claims and the implications of those claims that have never been answered. Many, like CIT, refuse to answer those questions point blank.



posted on Jan, 6 2009 @ 09:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Skibum
 
where is all the surveillance around this building??? i find it odd that this is the only DoD video we have of the crash...



posted on Jan, 11 2009 @ 05:36 AM
link   
ok look.... we all know how goverments always hide their stupidity , and their mistakes , and things they do to gain power and money... there is enough technology to create all this images ... but the us gov. knew that the airstrike was coming up, like in pearl harbor they just needed to create an excuse to atack middle east to access their oil resources... thats the real thing and everybody in the world knows that. SO STOP ARGUING ABOUT THIS... THE DAMAGE IS DONE!!! AS ALWAYS THE REAL PERPETRATORS WILL WALK FREE... IN GOD WE THRUST ..... U.S SHOULD'NT USE THAT FRASE ON NOTHING!!!! THOUSANDS OF DEATHS JUST FOR MONEY AND POWER .. WHAT A SHAME.



posted on Jan, 16 2009 @ 12:37 PM
link   
Here are the facts from a former military personal. If a 757 struck the side of the pentagon then where are the passengers, where are the seats, where the wings and the engine that supposedly hit the fence and the generator. If a plane impacts something it will leave a trail of debris. The black boxes we were told that they were unable to either be found or unable to retrieve any information off of them not that they didn't want to bring hurt to any one else. The pentagon is considered the most secure building in the WORLD but yet no cameras were able to confirm that a plane ever hit the building. The eyewitness accounts are also false. The news media who I happen to work for said the all eyewitness accounts were not creditable because no one actually saw the object up close. You said that in-fact a 757 did hit the building I ask where is the entire tail section in your photos. The pictures don't even show any seats or luggage in- fact it doesn't really show nothing of any evidence that a plane was to blame for the impact. The pentagon also has a defense system to shoot down any in coming aircraft or missile why was it not activated. I would like to see hard evidence to make me believe that in- fact a 757 hit this building without photo shopping any images.



posted on Jan, 22 2009 @ 10:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Jedi_Master
 
Yeah tires and wheels are different tho,,,



posted on Jan, 22 2009 @ 11:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by jthomas So far, after seven whole years, every attempt to refute the overwhelming evidence that AA77 hit the Pentagon has failed. There is a whole list of questions that 9/11 Truthers who claim no jet hit the Pentagon have been asked all those years about their claims and the implications of those claims that have never been answered. Many, like CIT, refuse to answer those questions point blank.
As a great bird once said: "Deny, deny, deny, deny." - Thomas Jay, the African Grey Parrot of the debunker movement. [edit on 22-1-2009 by ipsedixit]



posted on Jan, 22 2009 @ 09:04 PM
link   
reply to post by Kidfinger
 
As a former Navy fighter pilot and now retired airline pilot I can tell you that it would be easier to land that US Air jet into the river than to fly that high speed approach into the Pentagon. And we are supposed to believe a "simulator" trained pilot descended from altitude, located that postage stamp target, and controlled that rapidly accelerating machine with constant trim to override the viciously increasing control forces? Then we are supposed to believe two huge jet engines merely liquified into a 16' hole? I would wager that the guy who put together this report was well compensated by the same government who is holding back the black boxes and countless videos that were taken that day. KJM



posted on Jan, 22 2009 @ 09:09 PM
link   
I am glad someone is defeeding all the rumors we(americans) spreading about our own country. It doesnt matter what hit the building or if there is no evidence of plane, like many of people say, but if we are together in one boat lets have faith in our capitan, our goverment because whatever they do they try for our own good. Just say Good Bless Amerika and pray ones in the while for your country instead of talking nonsence, it will get you nowhere. Aleksandr From Russia with Love.



posted on Jan, 24 2009 @ 07:48 PM
link   
How does one explain a near cylindrical hole punched through 4 or 5 steel reinforced concrete walls in the pentagon from an aluminum air plane of which only one engine (not from a 757) was recovered?



posted on Jan, 25 2009 @ 01:08 PM
link   
I just watched , video Loose Change, and that is very convincing. I am not accepting your information...even though I am not really a conspiracy type. Bush, Cheney, & Rumsfeld truly were Anti-Americans...so I do not know to what extent they would go to force their Ideology on all us Americans.



posted on Jan, 25 2009 @ 01:26 PM
link   
i have not gone through all the posts but something that stood out for me was the pictures that were posted. why is there a NO PARKING sign there on the one picture it seems out of place as it seems there a marked parking bays on another side of the Pentagon and as that is on the grassy side i dont think people would have parked there anyway. why are there no windows on the picture where it shows the small hole in the wall. i cannot figure where this picture was taken as the penatgon shows many windows at the crash site. 64 dead people from that plane surely not on such a size plane? [edit on 25-1-2009 by waynedg]



posted on Jan, 25 2009 @ 05:01 PM
link   
reply to post by waynedg
 
that's not the exterior of the building. it's between "rings"



posted on Jan, 25 2009 @ 05:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Anonymous ATS
 
catherder has the hole size wrong. the hole is more of a slash, like at the wtc. this slash is hidden by the foam spray in her first post. it's really around 90' wide.



posted on Jan, 26 2009 @ 08:40 AM
link   
so there is a NO PARKING ALLOWED WITHIN THE RINGS THEN?



posted on Jan, 26 2009 @ 03:31 PM
link   
Good job putting all that together TS. However. In my mind it doesn't really matter what hit the pentagon. The fact that of the near 90 cameras, there is not one (clear) picture of a plane anywhere near hitting the pentagon is huge. Also the fact that it was ALLOWED to fly a huge circle in the most restricted airspace in the world, for what 20 some odd minutes, is just utter garbage. The plane should have been taken out. Payne stewart the golfer, flew his little cessena just barely over that airspace and had jets on his arse within 10 minutes. On 9/11 they even had forewarning that the US was under attack, the response time should have been better. So if anything your original post proves LIHOP that the gov. (Let IT Happen on purpose). And contrary to popular belief, and what our gov tells us. There are AA missile batteries all over D.C. [edit on 26-1-2009 by Nola213]



posted on Jan, 27 2009 @ 09:28 AM
link   
reply to post by CatHerder
 



posted on Jan, 29 2009 @ 01:16 AM
link   
reply to post by Skibum
 
We are talking about the PENTAGON here pal...not some kwicky mart closed circuit black and white camera. This is one of the most secure sites on THE PLANET, and if you look, you will find in pictures of the pentagon pre-crash, that there are many MANY cameras ALL OVER the building hanging over the rooftops. So, what the government release are five lousy frames from the gate cam so so far away when there are cameras everywhere. Yes, let's all trust the government....they NEVER lie!







 
102
<< 279  280  281    283  284  285 >>

log in

join