It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GLontra
The Iranian president, Ahmedinajab, is not in Iran now. He is in official travel to Venezuela.
I hope they don't take it as an "opportunity" to attack Iran while its leader is outside the country.
Originally posted by GLontra
I don't think that Israel has the courage to attack Iran alone, without the "all clear" sign from the US.
Israel is just posturing.
This is total bull. Iran has been doing this for YEARS.
Israel has proven they are mature enough to have nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
reply to post by popsmayhem
Sorry but Mao had nukes. Stalin had nukes. Kim Jong Il had nukes. Pakistan has nukes.
People in power have one thing in common, they want to keep their power. Iran wouldn't use nukes even if they got one because they would be wiped off the map.
If Israel wants to go to war with Iran, they can at it alone. If you personally want to go to war with Iran, move to Israel and join their army.
Enough with fighting wars for the elite.edit on 9-1-2012 by Vitchilo because: (no reason given)
Iran would covertly make a dirty bomb in a suitcase and give it to one
of there terrorist to use against Israel the US. who ever. Iran would just deny
having anything to do with it.
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by popsmayhem
Israel has proven they are mature enough to have nuclear weapons.
So you have to show maturity to have Nuclear weapons? How about having no Nuclear weapons period wouldn't that be a mature move? What's immature is the U.S. Government crying about others having nuclear weapons yet we have many, and we have actually used them on people whether it be Hiroshima, or during the 1950's in the Nevada desert when they were testing them on U.S. Troops... Just think of it as Iran is protecting their own rear ends.
I'm honored you fought for your country in ww2. Thats right is wasn't your neck on the line, so you forget about pearl harbor
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to
Besides Pearl Harbor was a clean attack, that didn't involve the killings of innocent civilians. Their main objective was to take out NAVY ships, and any air assets they had on the Island.
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by popsmayhem
I'm honored you fought for your country in ww2. Thats right is wasn't your neck on the line, so you forget about pearl harbor
I was in Iraq not WW2. I am sorry if my knowledge base is higher then yours concerning this issue. Besides Pearl Harbor was a clean attack, that didn't involve the killings of innocent civilians. Their main objective was to take out NAVY ships, and any air assets they had on the Island.