It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So basically by your logic if Iran withdraw from the NPT then they have the right to build nukes, correct?
things that would make a Billy Goat Puke.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by brill
Hey genius, you’re trying to compare the accidental shooting of an airliner with the intentional terrorist bombing of protected embassies.
Apples and oranges….
But, you think it furthers your agenda so it’s OK, right?
We shouldn't do business with any country that killed hundreds of American citizens when we were not even at war with them
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
If the persian clothed headgear leader truly cares for the impoverised Africans, they would had offered religion, cash or oil, food and resource management education to them instead of nuclear energy to the African despots.
It speaks volume of how truly 'enlightened' and religious that persian infidel leader truly is. It seems that it is not enough for him to expose his ill-educated citizens to the dangers of nuke energy/weapons, now he wants the African masses to experience such misery.....when will this evil be stopped?.....
Sharon Squassoni Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division
The IAEA carries out regular inspections of Iranian nuclear sites but has not sent a senior official for talks since August, before it released its latest report containing what was described as intelligence showing Iran's nuclear military aims. Western countries seized on the IAEA report last month to ratchet up economic sanctions.
Western countries seized on the IAEA report last month to ratchet up economic sanctions.
Enriched uranium is a critical component for both civil nuclear power generation and military nuclear weapons. The International Atomic Energy Agency attempts to monitor and control enriched uranium supplies and processes in its efforts to ensure nuclear power generation safety and curb nuclear weapons proliferation.
Originally posted by xuenchen
The original article seems to be redirected to a newer story.
here is an article from Haaretz:
Iran offers nuclear technology to friendly African nations
Originally posted by dubiousone
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by seabag
I do think this is a pretty ballsy move on Iran's behalf considering the current situation.
One would figure they would keep this announcement on the down low if they knew what's good for them, which leaves me to think that they announced this on purpose. I can think of a few possible reasons, but none of them are as good as them just shushing about it.
Did they announce something evil or ill-willed? If not, then why do you criticize them for making this announcement?
Originally posted by PURIFIER
reply to post by seabag
I am getting really tired of this nonsense... Please, just answer the following question: who licensed USA and Israel with the power to decide who may and who may not have nuclear power???? Do they have registered patent, care to tell me its number? What if one of the countries decided to monopolize electricity and dictate which country may have it and which may not? No, electricity is not a weapon but you cannot produce modern weapons without electricity. And how would you feel if your country would get on the blacklist? I know the example is a little bit exaggerated but you feel me, right?
Iran signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. As they were not advanced enough to develop their own reactors they purchased the tech from Russia. If you sign this treaty...you must abide by it...Iran has not.
It is that simple. Countries that do not sign are within their right to develop Nuclear Weapons...Iran is not allowed and if they do....the U.S. will stop this and capture all Nuke facilities in Iran. Israel wanted to bomb these sites a year ago...the U.S. prevented this because of the potential of Radiation killing a population that is majority pro-democracy.
Originally posted by Thundersmurf
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
If the persian clothed headgear leader truly cares for the impoverised Africans, they would had offered religion, cash or oil, food and resource management education to them instead of nuclear energy to the African despots.
It speaks volume of how truly 'enlightened' and religious that persian infidel leader truly is. It seems that it is not enough for him to expose his ill-educated citizens to the dangers of nuke energy/weapons, now he wants the African masses to experience such misery.....when will this evil be stopped?.....
That is such an odd comment, both in substance and style. Perhaps trying speaking within your means and understanding.
If all international laws and regulations are followed why shouldn't they share their technology with other nations? Those very regulations are put in place to ensure that these things are shared and developed safely. Every developed/advanced nation on the planet got most of their technology, or understanding of, by sharing with others. It's how we've developed for hundreds of thousands of years.
Peace
Originally posted by Kram09
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Wiped off the Map - Rumour of the Century
Another link for you.
Originally posted by Ek Bharatiya
Originally posted by xuenchen
The original article seems to be redirected to a newer story.
here is an article from Haaretz:
Iran offers nuclear technology to friendly African nations
I would like to remind the mods about this. Please change the link. The original link does not show the story reported.