It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by maddog99
Santorum's rise to the top will be the most laughable and short lived out of all the "Anyone But Ron Paul" flavors the GOP throws at us.
He's too arrogant to even realize they used him like a rented mule.
They MSM says RP is running the most negative campaign but IMO, it's not really an attack if you are pointing out the truth with facts based on past political moves?
Originally posted by maddog99
Santorum's rise to the top will be the most laughable and short lived out of all the "Anyone But Ron Paul" flavors the GOP throws at us.
He's too arrogant to even realize they used him like a rented mule.
Originally posted by Tesclo
Originally posted by maddog99
Santorum's rise to the top will be the most laughable and short lived out of all the "Anyone But Ron Paul" flavors the GOP throws at us.
He's too arrogant to even realize they used him like a rented mule.
He's already almost entirely broke. He doesn't have enough to even make a dent in NH which is why this was targeted at SC. Santorum is and has already been the biggest joke.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by CALGARIAN
They MSM says RP is running the most negative campaign but IMO, it's not really an attack if you are pointing out the truth with facts based on past political moves?
The definition of a "negative campaign" is that you air ads and talk about your opponents faults instead of airing ads and talking about reasons why you are a good candidate.
The ads can be 100% factual, but it is still a negative campaign because you are trying to tell people why not to vote for someone instead of why they should be voting for you.
So the MSM is right in that respect.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by CALGARIAN
They MSM says RP is running the most negative campaign but IMO, it's not really an attack if you are pointing out the truth with facts based on past political moves?
The definition of a "negative campaign" is that you air ads and talk about your opponents faults instead of airing ads and talking about reasons why you are a good candidate.
The ads can be 100% factual, but it is still a negative campaign because you are trying to tell people why not to vote for someone instead of why they should be voting for you.
So the MSM is right in that respect.
Originally posted by NeoVain
After seeing this AD i realize, i have seen negative ads on every candidate, except on Ron Paul.
The other candidates have trouble diggin up dirt on him? Or are they just letting the MSM do that with the newsletter issue, trusting they will handle it so they don´t have to spend the money?
I don´t know, if there is one, please link it, cause i would really like to see if there is one.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Originally posted by maddog99
Santorum's rise to the top will be the most laughable and short lived out of all the "Anyone But Ron Paul" flavors the GOP throws at us.
He's too arrogant to even realize they used him like a rented mule.
I think you meant "anyone but Romney".
Ron Paul even played that roll in December...and I believe his was the most short lived out of all of them. If Santorum stays on his rise for a few more days, he would have lasted longer than Ron Paul.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by maddog99
No...the "not Romney" is being decided by the voters that don't want to vote for a Mormon, or someone who thinks Romneycare is just like Obamacare, or thinks he is a flip flopper.
I think the GOP is fine with Romney...they know he is their best chance to beat Obama.
I think it is funny that you think this is all being done because of Ron Paul.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by maddog99
I think it is funny that you think this is all being done because of Ron Paul.