It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by SmoKeyHaZe
No we are a different breed to those Glory hunters, I have been to the swamp a few times over the years and the amount of different accents you get is funny.
Iam from the old school you support your local team (where you were born) unless all your family support the team, not support a team because they win.
We are not used to winning stuff and I still find it odd, but heck we deserve it more than the reds
Btw watch this for a laugh
www.youtube.com...
Take it, take it, take it, take it Bobby Charlton ....classic lol
Notice the Red is a southerner lol
Back to the OP you can bet if there is trouble it is because one team wins and a copper who supports the other team gets angry and goes overboard.edit on 5-1-2012 by boymonkey74 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by dragonsrreal
reply to post by JessopJessopJessop
Personaly I havnt got a problem with it being called soccer. Just dont go saying that American football players are tougher than Rugby Players
Originally posted by dragonsrreal
Thought I would jump back onto this. Glad to see that its not descending into a my teams better than yours thread, which is the last thing I would have wanted to see.
Heres a question though. When all the so called fans are away from the ground and causing havoc in manchester city centre will all the police be in riot control gear there?
Im yet to be convinced that there is a definate need for ALL police offcers that will be at the match to be in riot ger. someone posted that as soon as the riiot gear goes on the attitude of the police changes. Got to say I agree with that.
If riot gear is needed at an event like this then like i said why not have them wearing vests or tabards over the Riot Gear to look less intimidating and less
robo cops. I think barbie Pink would be the ideal non confrontational colour.
Originally posted by dragonsrreal
reply to post by JessopJessopJessop
No disrespect here from me for american football, and believe me I am not a football fan in the slightest. Ive got the looks and injuries that go hand in hand with having played rugby union since 8 years old, retired from playing at 42 but miss being on the pitch
I would agree with you that maybe 10 to 15 years ago american football was a more physically demading sport with the fitter atheletes, but the speed that rugby is played these days and the size and speed of makes it e toughter sport. Either way all are good and at least the ball is the right shape
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by detachedindividual
1. The PTB are increasingly inching their way forward in dealing with the civil unrest we're going to be seeing. We've had riots, they've started the discussion about militarizing the Police across the country and considering the use of live ammo.
They're not "considering" it in the slightest, it was just touted as an option in very specific cases where life is put at risk when a report into the riots was completed. All Police forces and the Government quickly rounded on this and shot down the notion that people could be shot for rioting.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
There are a few groups in the UK (mostly the EDL/BNP Neo Nazi's) who plan and organize riots at these games.
When was the last riot at an English football game exactly? You speak as if it is a common thing.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
3. England has an impressive record of football violence. It's all very well crying about how it's unfair to label, but some stereotypes are true.
A record that ended in the 1990's, some 20 years ago. It's like saying Germans have a penchant for gassing Jews, just because they used to back in the past. What was once true shouldn't always be true. English football has worked exceedingly hard to stamp this nonsense out and, by and large, they have succeeded. Is it not right then that we're recognised for that? Like I said, other nations have far worse violence and yet no-one stereotypes them.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
In the UK, there are a hell of a lot of drunk, violent, racist thugs who enjoy football not for the sport but for the violence associated with it.
And if they are caught doing this during a game or even near one they will find themselves being banned for life and facing charges, hence why hardly anyone gets done for it anymore.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Yes there are plenty of people who wouldn't hurt a fly who go to matches, but that doesn't seem to make any difference to the fact that a lot of matches get violent every year.
Alot of matches get violent? Do point out which, as I must have missed this. Even Millwall fans are well behaved these days.............
After some 20 years of relatively good behaviour among English football fans in general, extreme scenes of rioting and hooliganism made a comeback at Upton Park on 25 August 2009, during a Football League Cup second round tie between London rivals West Ham United and Millwall. The pitch was invaded several times during the game and rioting in the streets came afterwards, with one incident resulting in a man suffering stab wounds.
On 1 December 2010, supporters of rival West Midlands clubs Aston Villa and Birmingham City clashed at St Andrew's stadium after a Football League Cup tie, which resulted in 14 people being injured - less than 24 hours before England's bid to host the 2018 World Cup failed
Cass Pennant, a former football hooligan, said that the rise in football hooliganism was the result of rising unemployment, poverty, and social discontent in the aftermath of the recent recession.