WTF??? Vote count rigged!!!

A few years back we had in our country also a up coming politician and the establishment was pulling every string to get him to go away.

Same happened, at an "important" speech in Parliament, the STATE broadcast went away... Only when he addressed the Parliament, all other before and after were fine.. Explanation: Technical difficulties. Sure...

( They would rather just killed him, but they did that already to his predecessor ...)

It's not I endorse the ideas , but I want fair media input.. Well we all do here at ATS.. So actually nothing new.

I don't understand why they go through lengths like that to rig an election.....The electoral collage can screw the popular vote already. Why all the sneaky when they can just put who they want in there anyway.

Originally posted by phishyblankwaters
reply to post by antonia

 

You do realize FF was a Bush man and never believed those were rigged? Wasting your time.

Wasting my time? Seems that's all I do on this site now, talk to brick walls and get point reductions from my favorite mod.

ATS has become very GOP lately. It's because there is a Democrat sitting in office. Once they get their Republican most of them will become anti-GOP again and they will get off your back.

I read a very interesting article from a book of essays (disinformation series) that was titled "Vote Scam". It was a very well researched and sourced article, and in a nut shell, it outlined how there has not been even close to a legitimate election since Kennedy (and who knows before that...).

The company was (at the time) called NES (News Election Services) and their job was to fix the problems that were happening with the elections. With the onset of television, different stations were reporting different winners and there was a lot of confusion. Solution? - privatize the elections so that there is consistency in the reporting. News Elections Services was a company that was owned and operated by all the major News organizations.

The article gives excellent examples and evidence of vote tampering, misreporting and outright voter fraud. This was back in the 1960's and I can imagine how they have fine tuned this procedure. I think it's obvious to any critical thinker that the elections this year is more like a hockey game going back and forth (why else would each of the candidates have their place on top regardless of how irrational they are?)

Ron Paul won the vote in Iowa. I'm pretty convinced of that. The sad part is that the diabold style voting system in the U.S. will never allow Ron Paul to win. He's never been to Bohemian Grove...

Maybe this will be the beginning of the awakening, when Americans realize they are big-brothered and the votes are rigged. 2012 is the dawning of the age of aquarius... the new beginning.

I recommend looking up "News Elections Services" because that was back in the 1960's and I know it has been even more deregulated / privatized and outsourced. They must have a new name(s) and people need to understand who they are and what their role is.

reply to post by daaskapital


Unfortunately the fix has been in for sometime now Folks !

If any of you recall...Mitt Romney was an attendee of the last Bilderberger's meeting....and we all pretty much know what that means as far as the Elite are concerned....

This doesn't surprise me at all. ...they'll do anything to get their candidate in the running AND to squeeze Ron Paul out....

We need to get vocal about this fraud early on because we are fairly certain that this will not be the only instance of it occurring.

Peace

election fraud in Iowa....

Originally posted by kawika


I never watch CNN or listen to NPR,

for that reason.

I predict if Ron does well people used to the MSM will suspect cheating.

edit on 3-1-2012 by kawika because: corectolated spel'n err

Why? If Ron Paul would have won, then he would have won. I don't recall any MSM cheating cries in 2008 when Huckabee won. I thought it was a bad decision on the part of the people of Iowa, but cheating? Come on. We in the real world tend to leave all the conspiracy stuff to the experts.

Originally posted by daaskapital
I have been watching the CNN live broadcast of the vote counting for Iowa, and i just seen a woman counting votes for Romney. She was counting, then once she reached 39, she skipped to 50! Did anyone else notice this?

It's bullpoo!

edit on 1/3/2012 by Mirthful Me because: Removed Profanity.

I was watching some of the counting last night too....and I thought to myself...what if people were paid off to vote for certain candidates...and what if the counters slipped in some (supposed) votes...that were written ahead of time. I'm just saying.

Moving the vote count to a secret location smells bad to me... Doesn't sound very democratic.

I wonder if the result would have been the same if the tabulation wasn't moved...? Can't say I'm sure about that.

www.youtube.com...

We need independent randomly-selected citizen oversight committees, like juries, to check on the state. I'm tired of having 100% trust in the fox guarding the hen house. Who's with me on this?

reply to post by Jim Scott


And normal people don't have agendas?