WTF??? Vote count rigged!!!

I have been watching the CNN live broadcast of the vote counting for Iowa, and i just seen a woman counting votes for Romney. She was counting, then once she reached 39, she skipped to 50! Did anyone else notice this?

It's bullpoo!

Dont worry if it's rigged either way you look at it

reply to post by daaskapital


I'm sure someone has it recorded and it will show on YouTube, I too thought i heard her skip. If she did we all know Romney payed her off probably(or one of his friends from the Elite).
If so say bye bye to Romney

damnit!! does anybody have tivo or w/e that can prove this?

reply to post by jheated5


Yeah i know man, but it sucks lol.

Do yourself a favor and watch MSNBC or use the internet for election results of any type
www.google.com...
elections.nytimes.com...

I've got a dvr and am on cnn, I'll go back and check.
brb

reply to post by daaskapital


Yeah? So why not get out there and find us a link to prove it?Then I'll be more then happy to make my feelings known...

reply to post by SunnyDee


Yeah mate, you will here the reporter talk over her, but you can hear her count in the 30's. then skips to 50!

reply to post by daaskapital


It has ALWAYS been rigged.

And it always will be.

Now CNN is saying the Paul won't be the nominee, but Romney will be

50 does not come after 39?

Wait, let me take off my shoes.

Intentional fraud vs. someone who has been counting too long.

I hope there isn't any voting fraud, but people are flawed so there are going to be "mistakes"
Of course there are countless concerned individuals watching this like a hawk, so I seriously doubt this will be the last report.

Heh, if Romney is cheating, then it isn't working... at least not for the moment with Paul in the (slim) lead

reply to post by daaskapital


I didn't see it, but is it possible that she made an honest mistake? People are not above error. If you check CNN right now Paul is #1 but only by a few hundred votes. It pretty much tied:

Live results Iowa Updated 9:10 p.m. EST, Jan 3, 2012
Republicans » Votes Vote%
Paul 3,821 24%
Romney 3,650 23%
Santorum 3,636 23%
Gingrich 2,058 13%
Perry 1,571 10%
Bachmann 978 6%
Huntsman 106 1%

The bars show Perry, Santorum, Romney, Gingrich, and Paul all tied. Nice one CNN.

reply to post by rogerstigers


by about 150 votes

Originally posted by daaskapital
Now CNN is saying the Paul won't be the nominee, but Romney will be

Well CNN can say Romney will be the nominee all they want, Iowa does not decide the nominee. There are still primaries in many other States to go before a Nominee is decided.

I would not get into an uproar just yet. If she skipped from 39-50 someone, some where, has got it on video and it will come out.

Originally posted by DestroyDestroyDestroy
reply to post by daaskapital

 

I didn't see it, but is it possible that she made an honest mistake? People are not above error. If you check CNN right now Paul is #1 but only by a few hundred votes. It pretty much tied:

Live results Iowa Updated 9:10 p.m. EST, Jan 3, 2012
Republicans » Votes Vote%
Paul 3,821 24%
Romney 3,650 23%
Santorum 3,636 23%
Gingrich 2,058 13%
Perry 1,571 10%
Bachmann 978 6%
Huntsman 106 1%

The bars show Perry, Santorum, Romney, Gingrich, and Paul all tied. Nice one CNN.

Yeah, I saw that.. I also love how Fox has Romney's campaign quarters on live stream.

reply to post by nightstalker78


It just happened, I doubt anyone posted any sort of video yet. Superman isn't real you know.....

Sounds like she is using the 1-2-skip-a-few-100 method.

Recount anyone?