Gravity engine?

Well do you know what is the real problem.
the problem is the dangerous cancerous virus called "Perpetual". Real Gravity engines are not perpetual and PMM do not exists.

People falsely stupidly relate Perpetual motion machines with "Gravity engines" without understanding about PMM and how gravitational energy can be used to run a gravity engine.

The problem with most people is they do not think properly about the fundamental Principle involved in any Gravity engine which needs little Electrical energy supplied initially.

There are 95 percent chances that working Gravity engines should work on the principle that the Gravity engine/Gravity wheel systems are innovatively designed to take in (consume) much more Gravitational energy than what energy needed to lift heavy ball upward.

Offcoarse this needs Innovative and detailing thinking power to design such a engine.

If you substract total Gravitational energy input from the energy needed to lift heavy balls up in a gravity wheel,you get some net gravitational energy which is the net energy input to the system(input after subtraction) which can be converted to electrical energy.This is the scientific basis for any real Gravity engine.And hence real Gravity engines are not perpetual and do not violate Laws of energy conservation.

Idiot People who do not believe in Gravity engines say that since you get more energy than supplied it violates physics and hence Gravity engines are impossible.

But the most worst thing is they do not consider the freely available hidden energy source in nature itself :The amplified larger quantity of gravitational energy used in innovative way than that of energy needed to lift heavy object up.

And the problem lies in cheaters claiming to invent/people attempting engines violating Laws of thermodynamics.
The Internet is full of around 100000 nonsense claims of Perpetual Motion Machines which are actually misguiding most people to believe that either gravity engines are not possible or are perpetual.

The words "gravity engines" themselves reveal that these engines use gravitational energy as input to engine.So there is no question of violating Energy conservation law.That is why I say Everytime that about 60 percet of world is going towards intelluctual drain.

The reasion why real Gravity engines are not perpetual is because,they use net gravitational energy input (input energy after subtraction as mentioned in my last comment) and can attain balanced energy equation without violating law of conservation.

Defination of perpetual Motion Machine from Wikipedia:

Perpetual motion describes hypothetical machines that produce more work or energy than they consume, whether they might operate indefinitely or not.

Just because you say it isn't perpetual and keep repeating does not mean the concept is not perpetual. Many of us still fail to see how exactly you plan to shield whatever matter you are shifting upwards from gravity while doing the shifting, since that is the only way a gravity engine could work without outside force input.

Your argument seems to rely heavily on semantics and wordplay. While this may allow you to convince people in a webforum that you may just be able to pull it off it's not going to fool mother nature. And at the heart of it that's really who you need to put one over on is mother nature not your fellow man.

The sad thing is I"m even a believer in overunity type research who thinks if it's done just right we can trick a fundamental force into powering a device for us in one way or another. A good example of this would be Thane Heins paradoxical regenerative acceleration phenomena. Now whether or not the system is overunity is not really the question... the true question is whether or not we can build a device that powers itself off of energy we don't have to provide for it in some way. LIke I said tricking mother nature...

I just fail to see where you are tricking mother nature. From everything you are explaining it sounds like you seem to think there is a way to beat the gravitational constant somehow, but you can't or won't disclose how. By the very nature of your claim, which is extraordinary, you ought to understand that people will demand extraordinary evidence to back it up. What you have given us is not that extraordinary proof.

As an aside to this subject though I'd also like to point out that a true OU device or gravity engine would fall under the aegis of a national security item if you tried to patent it. So by going the patent route you are guaranteeing that if you do succeed all that will happen is you will have your invention taken from you. Why not go the open source route and make the world a better place?

I am working on an alternate energy project myself right now that is way more efficient than current methods, and i will be open sourcing anything and everything I learn from this project for anyone who wants to use it. It shocks and saddens me how many people get carried away in the cycle of greed as soon as they come up with a workable idea.