It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“This is free play,” he said. “The OPFOR has the ability to win here.”
“Not so,” Van Riper told Army Times. “Instead of a free-play, two-sided game as the Joint Forces commander advertised it was going to be, it simply became a scripted exercise. They had a predetermined end, and they scripted the exercise to that end.”
Besides a scripted, outdated war game?
Originally posted by Fitch303
The US Navy has 11 carriers which means 11 battle groups. Only one group is in that location so I doubt the US Navy will be destroyed.
The US army does not serve freeloading traitors like you.
You really think Russia or China would go to war over Iran? Especially if Iran closed the strait?
If the US loses its carriers it would be unable to destroy iran.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
If the US loses its carriers it would be unable to destroy iran.
Originally posted by Cosmic4life
..logic dictates that a Carrier group is no match for a whole national armory.
A Carrier group against a nation like Iran...no contest, Iran wins.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Wouldn't surprise me if they were willing to ``sacrifice`` those soldiers. Wouldn't be the first time a government does this.
Originally posted by IsraeliGuy
Originally posted by Cosmic4life
..logic dictates that a Carrier group is no match for a whole national armory.
It really depends who you are up against. Not just any nation can sustain an American super carrier fleet.
A Carrier group against a nation like Iran...no contest, Iran wins.
What does "a nation like Iran" suppose to mean? Is Iran a superpower or a global military hardcore force and we didn't know about it?