It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Johannmon
Valid or not who cares if Bush was Awol for a month or two 30 years or so ago. What difference does that make today. NONE!! Think about it people. What if every thing you did 30 years ago was held under a microscope. Would any little indiscretions appear? For the vast majority of people they would. Do they really affect your character today? NO, except that they are lessons learned. President Bush has not made an issue out of his service back then and therefore it should not be a campaign issue, unless you are simply looking for muck to rake.
Kerry on the other hand has listed his questionable service as one of the reasons we should elect him and it is therefore fair game to go after. The president has actually come in on Kerry's side on this issue by saying that his service in nam was honorable. What more can you ask for.
Can we please get beyond these kind of irrelevant issues and on to the real and pressing issues of this campaign. This is such a waste of time.
Originally posted by Indy
I could be wrong but I believe that going AWOL is a crime. Is it a felony? If it were then that would mean Bush cannot run for president. But then again he would have to be prosecuted. And that will NEVER happen. Yeah it was 30 years ago but do you want a man that went AWOL to lead your military?
Originally posted by koji_K
While Kerry did make the decision to play up his Vietnam service, it must be remembered that Bush first made the decision to declare a "war" on terror and call himself a "war president." Accordingly, his "real" war record is an important one in determining his fitness for the task he has defined.
-koji K.
Originally posted by Johannmon
Originally posted by Indy
I could be wrong but I believe that going AWOL is a crime. Is it a felony? If it were then that would mean Bush cannot run for president. But then again he would have to be prosecuted. And that will NEVER happen. Yeah it was 30 years ago but do you want a man that went AWOL to lead your military?
Give me a break. If he was Awol it was for a very short time, if it happened at all. He was a kid.
The Selectric II had a lever (above the right platen knob) that would allow the platen to be turned freely but return to the same vertical line (for inserting such symbols as subscripts and superscripts), whereas the Selectric I did not.
Originally posted by Indy
Thanks Trick for posting that. I change my mind about it not being a typewriter. It must be a typewriter. I did a test in Word to see how the superscript would look. Word doesn't raise the superscript that high. Only a typewriter would. But if the most advanced typewriter of the age didn't have superscript then what did? Could it have been an old manual typewriter instead of a modern electric?
Originally posted by Jamuhn
Indy, Selectric II:
www.fact-index.com...
The Selectric II had a lever (above the right platen knob) that would allow the platen to be turned freely but return to the same vertical line (for inserting such symbols as subscripts and superscripts), whereas the Selectric I did not.
Originally posted by Johannmon
Originally posted by koji_K
While Kerry did make the decision to play up his Vietnam service, it must be remembered that Bush first made the decision to declare a "war" on terror and call himself a "war president." Accordingly, his "real" war record is an important one in determining his fitness for the task he has defined.
-koji K.
that is just a bunch of BS. A real war record is how you handle yourself as leader during war time. It has nothing to do with what you did 30 years before as a wet behind the ears spoiled rich kid.
But previously unseen documents from Killian's PERSONAL (emphasis added) file obtained by 60 Minutes include a memorandum from May 1972, where Killian writes that Lt. Bush called him to talk about "how he can get out of coming to drill from now through November."
Originally posted by Bleys
Koji - I am posting my question and clarification in both threads.
The CBS site notes that they sent these 4 memos to the WH - who released them to the public without comment. What does this mean?
Originally posted by Mynaeris
I am not American. I must say that politics in America is about as low as anyone can sink. The media and people break down the candidates to the point where it is rather difficult to understand how anybody can have any respect for the President (whether Bush or Clinton). Whats more amazing is how clean everybody's closet must be that they are willing to throw the first stone.
Don't get me wrong I think America is an amazing place but the way politics is fought is petty in the extreme.