Romney = Obama, Visual proof in the Donations

Source: NY Times Data







Who is your president working for? Look at the distribution of donations. A lot of Obama and Romney donations come from California and NYC/NY area, bought and paid for. Now compare with Ron Paul. He did not get a single billionaire donor. Please share this on social media if you so choose to

reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL


GREAT chart!!!

is it yours?? may i borrow and spread??

S & F

Obama is another head of the million-head-establishment-monster we're trying to fight.

They're all the same, we gotta put Ron in the oval office and start the process of cleaning SHOP!

reply to post by darrman


Please do spread I gathered it from various sources like NY times and put it in a concise format for everyone here. Please I encourage the spread of this Thank you

reply to post by darrman


and BY the way....WHO gave Obama All that money??

something fishy..

and he spent HOW much?? Where????? to who????

more fish-E-ness.

Most, if not all of Ron Paul's donations come from everyday people of the working class, and the military. Twelve Million does not seem like a drop compared to One Hundred Million.

It doesn't really matter though. He is spreading a message of truth which is priceless, and it will continue to spread regardless of his funds by his supporter's word of mouth.

I tell everyone I know about him.

Be well.

It's too early to make this sort of comparison.

Obama is the only Democratic candidate so he will receive ALL the democratic/liberal and left-leaning independent donors.

The right-leaning donors are still spread out among several candidates - not knowing who will be the horse to bet on.
If Romney is the final candidate after the primaries he will have ALL those billionaire donors in his side, not the 42 he shows now but the total number of 85, versus Obama's 30.

But, even that can't be stated as a final number because Obama, being the only Dem in the race, most of his billionaire donors have yet to donate or make their move (why should they, the race for the general election hasn't started yet).

It will end up like it does every election year, both Dems and Repubs will spend about a billion dollars each on the election and will have the same number of billionaire donors.

It's a nice graph, but meaningless when one compares the sole incumbent candidate to the several challengers still vying with one another before their primaries.

reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL


When I pass out superbrochures, one of the main things I always try to bring up is that Ron Pauls campaign donations come primarily from individuals rather than big banks and corporations like with all of the other politicians. Despite how stupid I think the general population is, that always seems to be attractive to them.