It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
First of all, which studies? He just said there are studies. I didn't see them. I could also have said that studies show that they have emotional scarring for the rest of their lives without providing them. But then you probably would've asked me for links and stuff, which you don't for him. Confirmation bias much. But if you want to believe non-provided so-called research over my so-called unqualified (whatever that means) unreasearched (baseless assertion on your part) opinion, then go ahead..
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by vasaga
reply to post by eletheia
I said this before, but, there's a difference between a child using its own imagination, and imposing a false belief on that child. However, this whole fairy thing could as well be imposed by some stuff she watched on TV or whatever. So.. How far would you go as a parent to refrain your child from being brainwashed by whatever means? Aside from that question, if they come to a conclusion of their own about something, like fairies in the garden, it's something they themselves came up with, and if you try telling them that it's not the case (you should not force them to not believe in this case either), they will realize eventually that you were trying to tell them the truth. With Santa it's the exact opposite. They will realize that you were trying to keep them in a deceiving state.
Yeah.. So? Like the fairy example above, that eletheia posted, they themselves will come up with tons of such situations. Santa is not needed for that. And of course they will eventually find out Santa is fake. That will still not change anything, especially regarding the trust between parent and child. It's still something that YOU imposed on the child while knowing it's not true. You think the child will not wonder why you didn't tell him/her the truth?
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by kosmicjack
The more I think about it, it does seem that, at some fundamental level, it could act to degrade a child's trust in their parents and thus their overall emotional well-being and sense of security.. Sure it's fun, but at what cost?
I know for sure my eight, about to be nine, year old is going to be uber ticked off. He takes things to heart.
Studies show that a child understands the difference between a myth and a lie if they're given the chance to discover truth for themself meaning you'll devastate a 5 year old if you cruely tell them that Santa isn't real but through their own power of observation they start to figure it out as they get older. A child views the learning of the truth about Santa as a right of passage especially if it has younger siblings as the child then takes on the responsibility of knowing the truth. meaning that it's actually an important part of theirr development regardless of what the armchair experts say.edit on 25-12-2011 by steveknows because: (no reason given)
So you get people like yourself basically saying that the concept of Santa is a bad thing. But then it gets pointed out that studies show that it's not. And then regardless of anything else anti Santa you said your main point of reponse is "Yeah so?"
Oh what you mean is that it's not worth anything unless it agrees with your unqualified unresearched opinion? Sorry fella I'll go with the studies.edit on 26-12-2011 by steveknows because: (no reason given)
reply to post by eletheia
When my daughter was young she was convinced we had 'faries' at the bottom of the garden there was no way she would believe otherwise, and she would put small quantities of food out for them on a table out of a doll's house.When the food disappeared (birds cats fieldmice?) her beliefs were confirmed. So what should i have done? well i just went along with it didn't make too much of it and eventually the situation absolved itself.
The Santa Myth: Should we perpetuate the lie to children?
Originally posted by vasaga
First of all, which studies? He just said there are studies. I didn't see them. I could also have said that studies show that they have emotional scarring for the rest of their lives without providing them. But then you probably would've asked me for links and stuff, which you don't for him. Confirmation bias much. But if you want to believe non-provided so-called research over my so-called unqualified (whatever that means) unreasearched (baseless assertion on your part) opinion, then go ahead..
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by vasaga
reply to post by eletheia
I said this before, but, there's a difference between a child using its own imagination, and imposing a false belief on that child. However, this whole fairy thing could as well be imposed by some stuff she watched on TV or whatever. So.. How far would you go as a parent to refrain your child from being brainwashed by whatever means? Aside from that question, if they come to a conclusion of their own about something, like fairies in the garden, it's something they themselves came up with, and if you try telling them that it's not the case (you should not force them to not believe in this case either), they will realize eventually that you were trying to tell them the truth. With Santa it's the exact opposite. They will realize that you were trying to keep them in a deceiving state.
Yeah.. So? Like the fairy example above, that eletheia posted, they themselves will come up with tons of such situations. Santa is not needed for that. And of course they will eventually find out Santa is fake. That will still not change anything, especially regarding the trust between parent and child. It's still something that YOU imposed on the child while knowing it's not true. You think the child will not wonder why you didn't tell him/her the truth?
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by kosmicjack
The more I think about it, it does seem that, at some fundamental level, it could act to degrade a child's trust in their parents and thus their overall emotional well-being and sense of security.. Sure it's fun, but at what cost?
I know for sure my eight, about to be nine, year old is going to be uber ticked off. He takes things to heart.
Studies show that a child understands the difference between a myth and a lie if they're given the chance to discover truth for themself meaning you'll devastate a 5 year old if you cruely tell them that Santa isn't real but through their own power of observation they start to figure it out as they get older. A child views the learning of the truth about Santa as a right of passage especially if it has younger siblings as the child then takes on the responsibility of knowing the truth. meaning that it's actually an important part of theirr development regardless of what the armchair experts say.edit on 25-12-2011 by steveknows because: (no reason given)
So you get people like yourself basically saying that the concept of Santa is a bad thing. But then it gets pointed out that studies show that it's not. And then regardless of anything else anti Santa you said your main point of reponse is "Yeah so?"
Oh what you mean is that it's not worth anything unless it agrees with your unqualified unresearched opinion? Sorry fella I'll go with the studies.edit on 26-12-2011 by steveknows because: (no reason given)
Second, telling your child that Santa is real, is a lie. That's a simple fact. You can try to spin it all you want and try putting it in the box of a myth, but it is still a lie. You are telling the child that something is real while it is not. That is the exact definition of a lie. And they will find out that it is a lie. And if children know the difference between myths and lies, it's actually an argument against telling your children that Santa exist, not for it. You're not telling your child that Santa is a story where people celebrate and get gifts from parents but act as if it's Santa, you tell them it is Santa. You see it as a myth because you already know. The child sees it as reality, then as a false belief, and then notices that you told them something that was not true.
Third, you completely ignore the point regarding the relationship between parent and child.
And you can't link to the post or anything because it's such a hard and difficult task.. If you expect me to go look through 23 pages, while you can't even provide something that you already know is there, then you're not worth debating and you're probably afraid. You say there are studies, I say I haven't seen them here. The burden of proof is on you to show that there are studies.
Originally posted by steveknows
A link to the studies have been posted on this thread. You find it. And the experts say you're wrong. I'll stick with he experts which agree with what most of us parents already know thanks.
Originally posted by vasaga
And you can't link to the post or anything because it's such a hard and difficult task.. If you expect me to go look through 23 pages, while you can't even provide something that you already know is there, then you're not worth debating and you're probably afraid. You say there are studies, I say I haven't seen them here. The burden of proof is on you to show that there are studies.
Originally posted by steveknows
A link to the studies have been posted on this thread. You find it. And the experts say you're wrong. I'll stick with he experts which agree with what most of us parents already know thanks.
Plus, if the study says that children know the difference between myth and reality or whatever, and says that they know Santa is a myth, that's just WRONG. It would be a wrong assumption because like I said before, children see Santa as a real person who brings them candy and gifts, not as a myth, unless parents teach them from the start that it's a myth, and that, I wouldn't have a problem with. It's the deceiving of children to make them think he's real that I have a problem with. This so-called "study" would only be valid in a case where parents told the truth from the beginning, or after a child has found out for themselves that Santa is a myth, not before.
But hey, if you wanna use appeal to authority to confirm your already present beliefs, go ahead.. You basically follow so-called "experts", instead of trying to think logically or for yourself. But.. I think somewhere inside you, you dislike that there is no Santa, and thus will propagate the so-called myth as much as possible to make up for cognitive dissonance.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. He exists as certainly as love and generosity and devotion exist, and you know that they abound and give to your life its highest beauty and joy. Alas! how dreary would be the world if there were no Santa Claus. It would be as dreary as if there were no Virginias. There would be no childlike faith then, no poetry, no romance to make tolerable this existence. We should have no enjoyment, except in sense and sight. The eternal light with which childhood fills the world would be extinguished.
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by kosmicjack
The more I think about it, it does seem that, at some fundamental level, it could act to degrade a child's trust in their parents and thus their overall emotional well-being and sense of security.. Sure it's fun, but at what cost?
I know for sure my eight, about to be nine, year old is going to be uber ticked off. He takes things to heart.
Studies show that a child understands the difference between a myth and a lie if they're given the chance to discover truth for themself meaning you'll devastate a 5 year old if you cruely tell them that Santa isn't real but through their own power of observation they start to figure it out as they get older. A child views the learning of the truth about Santa as a right of passage especially if it has younger siblings as the child then takes on the responsibility of knowing the truth. meaning that it's actually an important part of theirr development regardless of what the armchair experts say.edit on 25-12-2011 by steveknows because: (no reason given)